 |
 |
CHAPTER XVII Principal Causes Maintaining The Democratic
Republic
Principal Causes Which Tend To Maintain The Democratic
Republic In The United States
A democratic republic subsists in the United States, and the
principal object of this book has been to account for the fact of its
existence. Several of the causes which contribute to maintain the institutions
of America have been involuntarily passed by or only hinted at as I was borne
along by my subject. Others I have been unable to discuss, and those on which I
have dwelt most are, as it were, buried in the details of the former parts of
this work. I think, therefore, that before I proceed to speak of the future, I
cannot do better than collect within a small compass the reasons which best
explain the present. In this retrospective chapter I shall be succinct, for I
shall take care to remind the reader very summarily of what he already knows;
and I shall only select the most prominent of those facts which I have not yet
pointed out.
All the causes which contribute to the maintenance of the
democratic republic in the United States are reducible to three heads: -
- The peculiar and accidental situation in which Providence has
placed the Americans.
- The laws.
- The manners and customs of the people.
Accidental Or Providential Causes Which Contribute To The
Maintenance Of The Democratic Republic In The United States
The Union has no neighbors - No metropolis - The Americans have
had the chances of birth in their favor - America an empty country - How this
circumstance contributes powerfully to the maintenance of the democratic
republic in America - How the American wilds are peopled - Avidity of the
Anglo-Americans in taking possession of the solitudes of the New World
-Influence of physical prosperity upon the political opinions of the Americans.
A thousand circumstances, independent of the will of man,
concur to facilitate the maintenance of a democratic republic in the United
States. Some of these peculiarities are known, the others may easily be pointed
out; but I shall confine myself to the most prominent amongst them.
The Americans have no neighbors, and consequently they have no
great wars, or financial crises, or inroads, or conquest to dread; they require
neither great taxes, nor great armies, nor great generals; and they have
nothing to fear from a scourge which is more formidable to republics than all
these evils combined, namely, military glory. It is impossible to deny the
inconceivable influence which military glory exercises upon the spirit of a
nation. General Jackson, whom the Americans have twice elected to the head of
their Government, is a man of a violent temper and mediocre talents; no one
circumstance in the whole course of his career ever proved that he is qualified
to govern a free people, and indeed the majority of the enlightened classes of
the Union has always been opposed to him. But he was raised to the Presidency,
and has been maintained in that lofty station, solely by the recollection of a
victory which he gained twenty years ago under the walls of New Orleans, a
victory which was, however, a very ordinary achievement, and which could only
be remembered in a country where battles are rare. Now the people which is thus
carried away by the illusions of glory is unquestionably the most cold and
calculating, the most unmilitary (if I may use the expression), and the most
prosaic of all the peoples of the earth.
America has no great capitala city,
whose influence is directly or indirectly felt over the whole extent of the
country, which I hold to be one of the first causes of the maintenance of
republican institutions in the United States. In cities men cannot be prevented
from concerting together, and from awakening a mutual excitement which prompts
sudden and passionate resolutions. Cities may be looked upon as large
assemblies, of which all the inhabitants are members; their populace exercises
a prodigious influence upon the magistrates, and frequently executes its own
wishes without their intervention.
To subject the provinces to the metropolis is therefore not
only to place the destiny of the empire in the hands of a portion of the
community, which may be reprobated as unjust, but to place it in the hands of a
populace acting under its own impulses, which must be avoided as dangerous. The
preponderance of capital cities is therefore a serious blow upon the
representative system, and it exposes modern republics to the same defect as
the republics of antiquity, which all perished from not having been acquainted
with that form of government.
It would be easy for me to adduce a great number of secondary
causes which have contributed to establish, and which concur to maintain, the
democratic republic of the United States. But I discern two principal
circumstances amongst these favorable elements, which I hasten to point out. I
have already observed that the origin of the American settlements may be looked
upon as the first and most efficacious cause to which the present prosperity of
the United States may be attributed. The Americans had the chances of birth in
their favor, and their forefathers imported that equality of conditions into
the country whence the democratic republic has very naturally taken its rise.
Nor was this all they did; for besides this republican condition of society,
the early settler bequeathed to their descendants those customs, manners, and
opinions which contribute most to the success of a republican form of
government. When I reflect upon the consequences of this primary circumstance,
methinks I see the destiny of America embodied in the first Puritan who landed
on those shores, just as the human race was represented by the first man.
The chief circumstance which has favored the establishment and
the maintenance of a democratic republic in the United States is the nature of
the territory which the American inhabit. Their ancestors gave them the love of
equality and of freedom, but God himself gave them the means of remaining equal
and free, by placing them upon a boundless continent, which is open to their
exertions. General prosperity is favorable to the stability of all governments,
but more particularly of a democratic constitution, which depends upon the
dispositions of the majority, and more particularly of that portion of the
community which is most exposed to feel the pressure of want. When the people
rules, it must be rendered happy, or it will overturn the State, and misery is
apt to stimulate it to those excesses to which ambition rouses kings. The
physical causes, independent of the laws, which contribute to promote general
prosperity, are more numerous in America than they have ever been in any other
country in the world, at any other period of history. In the United States not
only is legislation democratic, but nature herself favors the cause of the
people.
In what part of human tradition can be found anything at all
similar to that which is occurring under our eyes in North America? The
celebrated communities of antiquity were all founded in the midst of hostile
nations, which they were obliged to subjugate before they could flourish in
their place. Even the moderns have found, in some parts of South America, vast
regions inhabited by a people of inferior civilization, but which occupied and
cultivated the soil. To found their new states it was necessary to extirpate or
to subdue a numerous population, until civilization has been made to blush for
their success. But North America was only inhabited by wandering tribes, who
took no thought of the natural riches of the soil, and that vast country was
still, properly speaking, an empty continent, a desert land awaiting its
inhabitants.
Everything is extraordinary in America, the social condition of
the inhabitants, as well as the laws; but the soil upon which these
institutions are founded is more extraordinary than all the rest. When man was
first placed upon the earth by the Creator, the earth was inexhaustible in its
youth, but man was weak and ignorant; and when he had learned to explore the
treasures which it contained, hosts of his fellow creatures covered its
surface, and he was obliged to earn an asylum for repose and for freedom by the
sword. At that same period North America was discovered, as if it had been kept
in reserve by the Deity, and had just risen from beneath the waters of the
deluge.
That continent still presents, as it did in the primeval time,
rivers which rise from never-failing sources, green and moist solitudes, and
fields which the ploughshare of the husbandman has never turned. In this state
it is offered to man, not in the barbarous and isolated condition of the early
ages, but to a being who is already in possession of the most potent secrets of
the natural world, who is united to his fellow-men, and instructed by the
experience of fifty centuries. At this very time thirteen millions of civilized
Europeans are peaceably spreading over those fertile plains, with whose
resources and whose extent they are not yet themselves accurately acquainted.
Three or four thousand soldiers drive the wandering races of the aborigines
before them; these are followed by the pioneers, who pierce the woods, scare
off the beasts of prey, explore the courses of the inland streams, and make
ready the triumphal procession of civilization across the waste.
The favorable influence of the temporal prosperity of America
upon the institutions of that country has been so often described by others,
and adverted to by myself, that I shall not enlarge upon it beyond the addition
of a few facts. An erroneous notion is generally entertained that the deserts
of America are peopled by European emigrants, who annually disembark upon the
coasts of the New World, whilst the American population increases and
multiplies upon the soil which its forefathers tilled. The European settler,
however, usually arrives in the United States without friends, and sometimes
without resources; in order to subsist he is obliged to work for hire, and he
rarely proceeds beyond that belt of industrious population which adjoins the
ocean. The desert cannot be explored without capital or credit; and the body
must be accustomed to the rigors of a new climate before it can be exposed to
the chances of forest life. It is the Americans themselves who daily quit the
spots which gave them birth to acquire extensive domains in a remote country.
Thus the European leaves his cottage for the trans-Atlantic shores; and the
American, who is born on that very coast, plunges in his turn into the wilds of
Central America. This double emigration is incessant; it begins in the remotest
parts of Europe, it crosses the Atlantic Ocean, and it advances over the
solitudes of the New World. Millions of men are marching at once towards the
same horizon; their language, their religion, their manners differ, their
object is the same. The gifts of fortune are promised in the West, and to the
West they bend their course.b
No event can be compared with this continuous removal of the
human race, except perhaps those irruptions which preceded the fall of the
Roman Empire. Then, as well as now, generations of men were impelled forwards
in the same direction to meet and struggle on the same spot; but the designs of
Providence were not the same; then, every newcomer was the harbinger of
destruction and of death; now, every adventurer brings with him the elements of
prosperity and of life. The future still conceals from us the ulterior
consequences of this emigration of the Americans towards the West; but we can
readily apprehend its more immediate results. As a portion of the inhabitants
annually leave the States in which they were born, the population of these
States increases very slowly, although they have long been established: thus in
Connecticut, which only contains fifty-nine inhabitants to the square mile, the
population has not increased by more than one-quarter in forty years, whilst
that of England has been augmented by one-third in the lapse of the same
period. The European emigrant always lands, therefore, in a country which is
but half full, and where hands are in request: he becomes a workman in easy
circumstances; his son goes to seek his fortune in unpeopled regions, and he
becomes a rich landowner. The former amasses the capital which the latter
invests, and the stranger as well as the native is unacquainted with want.
The laws of the United States are extremely favorable to the
division of property; but a cause which is more powerful than the laws prevents
property from being divided to excess.c This is
very perceptible in the States which are beginning to be thickly peopled;
Massachusetts is the most populous part of the Union, but it contains only
eighty inhabitants to the square mile, which is must less than in France, where
162 are reckoned to the same extent of country. But in Massachusetts estates
are very rarely divided; the eldest son takes the land, and the others go to
seek their fortune in the desert. The law has abolished the rights of
primogeniture, but circumstances have concurred to re-establish it under a form
of which none can complain, and by which no just rights are impaired.
A single fact will suffice to show the prodigious number of
individuals who leave New England, in this manner, to settle themselves in the
wilds. We were assured in 1830 that thirty-six of the members of Congress were
born in the little State of Connecticut. The population of Connecticut, which
constitutes only one forty-third part of that of the United States, thus
furnished one-eighth of the whole body of representatives. The States of
Connecticut, however, only sends five delegates to Congress; and the thirty-one
others sit for the new Western States. If these thirty-one individuals had
remained in Connecticut, it is probable that instead of becoming rich
landowners they would have remained humble laborers, that they would have lived
in obscurity without being able to rise into public life, and that, far from
becoming useful members of the legislature, they might have been unruly
citizens.
These reflections do not escape the observation of the
Americans any more than of ourselves. "It cannot be doubted," says Chancellor
Kent in his "Treatise on American Law," "that the division of landed estates
must produce great evils when it is carried to such excess as that each parcel
of land is insufficient to support a family; but these disadvantages have never
been felt in the United States, and many generations must elapse before they
can be felt. The extent of our inhabited territory, the abundance of adjacent
land, and the continual stream of emigration flowing from the shores of the
Atlantic towards the interior of the country, suffice as yet, and will long
suffice, to prevent the parcelling out of estates."
It is difficult to describe the rapacity with which the
American rushes forward to secure the immense booty which fortune proffers to
him. In the pursuit he fearlessly braves the arrow of the Indian and the
distempers of the forest; he is unimpressed by the silence of the woods; the
approach of beasts of prey does not disturb him; for he is goaded onwards by a
passion more intense than the love of life. Before him lies a boundless
continent, and he urges onwards as if time pressed, and he was afraid of
finding no room for his exertions. I have spoken of the emigration from the
older States, but how shall I describe that which takes place from the more
recent ones? Fifty years have scarcely elapsed since that of Ohio was founded;
the greater part of its inhabitants were not born within its confines; its
capital has only been built thirty years, and its territory is still covered by
an immense extent of uncultivated fields; nevertheless the population of Ohio
is already proceeding westward, and most of the settlers who descend to the
fertile savannahs of Illinois are citizens of Ohio. These men left their first
country to improve their condition; they quit their resting-place to ameliorate
it still more; fortune awaits them everywhere, but happiness they cannot
attain. The desire of prosperity is become an ardent and restless passion in
their minds which grows by what it gains. They early broke the ties which bound
them to their natal earth, and they have contracted no fresh ones on their way.
Emigration was at first necessary to them as a means of subsistence; and it
soon becomes a sort of game of chance, which they pursue for the emotions it
excites as much as for the gain it procures.
Sometimes the progress of man is so rapid that the desert
reappears behind him. The woods stoop to give him a passage, and spring up
again when he has passed. It is not uncommon in crossing the new States of the
West to meet with deserted dwellings in the midst of the wilds; the traveller
frequently discovers the vestiges of a log house in the most solitary retreats,
which bear witness to the power, and no less to the inconstancy of man. In
these abandoned fields, and over these ruins of a day, the primeval forest soon
scatters a fresh vegetation, the beasts resume the haunts which were once their
own, and Nature covers the traces of man's path with branches and with flowers,
which obliterate his evanescent track.
I remember that, in crossing one of the woodland districts
which still cover the State of New York, I reached the shores of a lake
embosomed in forests coeval with the world. A small island, covered with woods
whose thick foliage concealed its banks, rose from the centre of the waters.
Upon the shores of the lake no object attested the presence of man except a
column of smoke which might be seen on the horizon rising from the tops of the
trees to the clouds, and seeming to hang from heaven rather than to be mounting
to the sky. An Indian shallop was hauled up on the sand, which tempted me to
visit the islet that had first attracted my attention, and in a few minutes I
set foot upon its banks. The whole island formed one of those delicious
solitudes of the New World which almost lead civilized man to regret the haunts
of the savage. A luxuriant vegetation bore witness to the incomparable
fruitfulness of the soil. The deep silence which is common to the wilds of
North America was only broken by the hoarse cooing of the wood-pigeon, and the
tapping of the woodpecker upon the bark of trees. I was far from supposing that
this spot had ever been inhabited, so completely did Nature seem to be left to
her own caprices; but when I reached the centre of the isle I thought that I
discovered some traces of man. I then proceeded to examine the surrounding
objects with care, and I soon perceived that a European had undoubtedly been
led to seek a refuge in this retreat. Yet what changes had taken place in the
scene of his labors! The logs which he had hastily hewn to build himself a shed
had sprouted afresh; the very props were intertwined with living verdure, and
his cabin was transformed into a bower. In the midst of these shrubs a few
stones were to be seen, blackened with fire and sprinkled with thin ashes; here
the hearth had no doubt been, and the chimney in falling had covered it with
rubbish. I stood for some time in silent admiration of the exuberance of Nature
and the littleness of man: and when I was obliged to leave that enchanting
solitude, I exclaimed with melancholy, "Are ruins, then, already here?"
In Europe we are wont to look upon a restless disposition, an
unbounded desire of riches, and an excessive love of independence, as
propensities very formidable to society. Yet these are the very elements which
ensure a long and peaceful duration to the republics of America. Without these
unquiet passions the population would collect in certain spots, and would soon
be subject to wants like those of the Old World, which it is difficult to
satisfy; for such is the present good fortune of the New World, that the vices
of its inhabitants are scarcely less favorable to society than their virtues.
These circumstances exercise a great influence on the estimation in which human
actions are held in the two hemispheres. The Americans frequently term what we
should call cupidity a laudable industry; and they blame as faint-heartedness
what we consider to be the virtue of moderate desires.
In France, simple tastes, orderly manners, domestic affections,
and the attachments which men feel to the place of their birth, are looked upon
as great guarantees of the tranquillity and happiness of the State. But in
America nothing seems to be more prejudicial to society than these virtues. The
French Canadians, who have faithfully preserved the traditions of their
pristine manners, are already embarrassed for room upon their small territory;
and this little community, which has so recently begun to exist, will shortly
be a prey to the calamities incident to old nations. In Canada, the most
enlightened, patriotic, and humane inhabitants make extraordinary efforts to
render the people dissatisfied with those simple enjoyments which still content
it. There, the seductions of wealth are vaunted with as much zeal as the charms
of an honest but limited income in the Old World, and more exertions are made
to excite the passions of the citizens there than to calm them elsewhere. If we
listen to their eulogies, we shall hear that nothing is more praiseworthy than
to exchange the pure and homely pleasures which even the poor man tastes in his
own country for the dull delights of prosperity under a foreign sky; to leave
the patrimonial hearth and the turf beneath which his forefathers sleep; in
short, to abandon the living and the dead in quest of fortune.
At the present time America presents a field for human effort
far more extensive than any sum of labor which can be applied to work it. In
America too much knowledge cannot be diffused; for all knowledge, whilst it may
serve him who possesses it, turns also to the advantage of those who are
without it. New wants are not to be feared, since they can be satisfied without
difficulty; the growth of human passions need not be dreaded, since all
passions may find an easy and a legitimate object; nor can men be put in
possession of too much freedom, since they are scarcely ever tempted to misuse
their liberties.
The American republics of the present day are like companies of
adventurers formed to explore in common the waste lands of the New World, and
busied in a flourishing trade. The passions which agitate the Americans most
deeply are not their political but their commercial passions; or, to speak more
correctly, they introduce the habits they contract in business into their
political life. They love order, without which affairs do not prosper; and they
set an especial value upon a regular conduct, which is the foundation of a
solid business; they prefer the good sense which amasses large fortunes to that
enterprising spirit which frequently dissipates them; general ideas alarm their
minds, which are accustomed to positive calculations, and they hold practice in
more honor than theory.
It is in America that one learns to understand the influence
which physical prosperity exercises over political actions, and even over
opinions which ought to acknowledge no sway but that of reason; and it is more
especially amongst strangers that this truth is perceptible. Most of the
European emigrants to the New World carry with them that wild love of
independence and of change which our calamities are so apt to engender. I
sometimes met with Europeans in the United States who had been obliged to leave
their own country on account of their political opinions. They all astonished
me by the language they held, but one of them surprised me more than all the
rest. As I was crossing one of the most remote districts of Pennsylvania I was
benighted, and obliged to beg for hospitality at the gate of a wealthy planter,
who was a Frenchman by birth. He bade me sit down beside his fire, and we began
to talk with that freedom which befits persons who meet in the backwoods, two
thousand leagues from their native country. I was aware that my host had been a
great leveller and an ardent demagogue forty years ago, and that his name was
not unknown to fame. I was, therefore, not a little surprised to hear him
discuss the rights of property as an economist or a landowner might have done:
he spoke of the necessary gradations which fortune establishes among men, of
obedience to established laws, of the influence of good morals in
commonwealths, and of the support which religious opinions give to order and to
freedom; he even went to far as to quote an evangelical authority in
corroboration of one of his political tenets.
I listened, and marvelled at the feebleness of human reason. A
proposition is true or false, but no art can prove it to be one or the other,
in the midst of the uncertainties of science and the conflicting lessons of
experience, until a new incident disperses the clouds of doubt; I was poor, I
become rich, and I am not to expect that prosperity will act upon my conduct,
and leave my judgment free; my opinions change with my fortune, and the happy
circumstances which I turn to my advantage furnish me with that decisive
argument which was before wanting. The influence of prosperity acts still more
freely upon the American than upon strangers. The American has always seen the
connection of public order and public prosperity, intimately united as they
are, go on before his eyes; he does not conceive that one can subsist without
the other; he has therefore nothing to forget; nor has he, like so many
Europeans, to unlearn the lessons of his early education.
a The United States
have no metropolis, but they already contain several very large cities.
Philadelphia reckoned 161,000 inhabitants and New York 202,000 in the year
1830. The lower orders which inhabit these cities constitute a rabble even more
formidable than the populace of European towns. They consist of freed blacks in
the first place, who are condemned by the laws and by public opinion to a
hereditary state of misery and degradation. They also contain a multitude of
Europeans who have been driven to the shores of the New World by their
misfortunes or their misconduct; and these men inoculate the United States with
all our vices, without bringing with them any of those interests which
counteract their baneful influence. As inhabitants of a country where they have
no civil rights, they are ready to turn all the passions which agitate the
community to their own advantage; thus, within the last few months serious
riots have broken out in Philadelphia and in New York. Disturbances of this
kind are unknown in the rest of the country, which is nowise alarmed by them,
because the population of the cities has hitherto exercised neither power nor
influence over the rural districts. Nevertheless, I look upon the size of
certain American cities, and especially on the nature of their population, as a
real danger which threatens the future security of the democratic republics of
the New World; and I venture to predict that they will perish from this
circumstance unless the government succeeds in creating an armed force, which,
whilst it remains under the control of the majority of the nation, will be
independent of the town population, and able to repress its
excesses.
[The population of the city of New York had
risen, in 1870, to 942,292, and that of Philadelphia to 674,022. Brooklyn,
which may be said to form part of New York city, has a population of 396,099,
in addition to that of New York. The frequent disturbances in the great cities
of America, and the excessive corruption of their local governments - over
which there is no effectual control - are amongst the greatest evils and
dangers of the country.]
b The number of
foreign immigrants into the United States in the last fifty years (from 1820 to
1871) is stated to be 7,556,007. Of these, 4,104,553 spoke English - that is,
they came from Great Britain, Ireland, or the British colonies; 2,643,069 came
from Germany or northern Europe; and about half a million from the south of
Europe.
c In New England the
estates are exceedingly small, but they are rarely subjected to further
division.
Influence Of The Laws Upon The Maintenance Of The Democratic
Republic In The United States
Three principal causes of the maintenance of the democratic
republic - Federal Constitutions - Municipal institutions - Judicial power.
The principal aim of this book has been to make known the laws
of the United States; if this purpose has been accomplished, the reader is
already enabled to judge for himself which are the laws that really tend to
maintain the democratic republic, and which endanger its existence. If I have
not succeeded in explaining this in the whole course of my work, I cannot hope
to do so within the limits of a single chapter. It is not my intention to
retrace the path I have already pursued, and a very few lines will suffice to
recapitulate what I have previously explained.
Three circumstances seem to me to contribute most powerfully to
the maintenance of the democratic republic in the United States.
The first is that Federal form of Government which the
Americans have adopted, and which enables the Union to combine the power of a
great empire with the security of a small State.
The second consists in those municipal institutions which limit
the despotism of the majority, and at the same time impart a taste for freedom
and a knowledge of the art of being free to the people.
The third is to be met with in the constitution of the judicial
power. I have shown in what manner the courts of justice serve to repress the
excesses of democracy, and how they check and direct the impulses of the
majority without stopping its activity.
Influence Of Manners Upon The Maintenance Of The Democratic
Republic In The United States
I have previously remarked that the manners of the people may
be considered as one of the general causes to which the maintenance of a
democratic republic in the United States is attributable. I here used the word
manners with the meaning which the ancients attached to the word mores, for I
apply it not only to manners in their proper sense of what constitutes the
character of social intercourse, but I extend it to the various notions and
opinions current among men, and to the mass of those ideas which constitute
their character of mind. I comprise, therefore, under this term the whole moral
and intellectual condition of a people. My intention is not to draw a picture
of American manners, but simply to point out such features of them as are
favorable to the maintenance of political institutions.
Religion Considered As A Political Institution, Which
Powerfully Contributes To The Maintenance Of The Democratic Republic Amongst
The Americans
North America peopled by men who professed a democratic and
republican Christianity - Arrival of the Catholics - For what reason the
Catholics form the most democratic and the most republican class at the present
time.
Every religion is to be found in juxtaposition to a political
opinion which is connected with it by affinity. If the human mind be left to
follow its own bent, it will regulate the temporal and spiritual institutions
of society upon one uniform principle; and man will endeavor, if I may use the
expression, to harmonize the state in which he lives upon earth with the state
which he believes to await him in heaven. The greatest part of British America
was peopled by men who, after having shaken off the authority of the Pope,
acknowledged no other religious supremacy; they brought with them into the New
World a form of Christianity which I cannot better describe than by styling it
a democratic and republican religion. This sect contributed powerfully to the
establishment of a democracy and a republic, and from the earliest settlement
of the emigrants politics and religion contracted an alliance which has never
been dissolved.
About fifty years ago Ireland began to pour a Catholic
population into the United States; on the other hand, the Catholics of America
made proselytes, and at the present moment more than a million of Christians
professing the truths of the Church of Rome are to be met with in the Union.d The Catholics are faithful to the observances of
their religion; they are fervent and zealous in the support and belief of their
doctrines. Nevertheless they constitute the most republican and the most
democratic class of citizens which exists in the United States; and although
this fact may surprise the observer at first, the causes by which it is
occasioned may easily be discovered upon reflection.
I think that the Catholic religion has erroneously been looked
upon as the natural enemy of democracy. Amongst the various sects of
Christians, Catholicism seems to me, on the contrary, to be one of those which
are most favorable to the equality of conditions. In the Catholic Church, the
religious community is composed of only two elements, the priest and the
people. The priest alone rises above the rank of his flock, and all below him
are equal.
On doctrinal points the Catholic faith places all human
capacities upon the same level; it subjects the wise and ignorant, the man of
genius and the vulgar crowd, to the details of the same creed; it imposes the
same observances upon the rich and needy, it inflicts the same austerities upon
the strong and the weak, it listens to no compromise with mortal man, but,
reducing all the human race to the same standard, it confounds all the
distinctions of society at the foot of the same altar, even as they are
confounded in the sight of God. If Catholicism predisposes the faithful to
obedience, it certainly does not prepare them for inequality; but the contrary
may be said of Protestantism, which generally tends to make men independent,
more than to render them equal.
Catholicism is like an absolute monarchy; if the sovereign be
removed, all the other classes of society are more equal than they are in
republics. It has not unfrequently occurred that the Catholic priest has left
the service of the altar to mix with the governing powers of society, and to
take his place amongst the civil gradations of men. This religious influence
has sometimes been used to secure the interests of that political state of
things to which he belonged. At other times Catholics have taken the side of
aristocracy from a spirit of religion.
But no sooner is the priesthood entirely separated from the
government, as is the case in the United States, than is found that no class of
men are more naturally disposed than the Catholics to transfuse the doctrine of
the equality of conditions into the political world. If, then, the Catholic
citizens of the United States are not forcibly led by the nature of their
tenets to adopt democratic and republican principles, at least they are not
necessarily opposed to them; and their social position, as well as their
limited number, obliges them to adopt these opinions. Most of the Catholics are
poor, and they have no chance of taking a part in the government unless it be
open to all the citizens. They constitute a minority, and all rights must be
respected in order to insure to them the free exercise of their own privileges.
These two causes induce them, unconsciously, to adopt political doctrines,
which they would perhaps support with less zeal if they were rich and
preponderant.
The Catholic clergy of the United States has never attempted to
oppose this political tendency, but it seeks rather to justify its results. The
priests in America have divided the intellectual world into two parts: in the
one they place the doctrines of revealed religion, which command their assent;
in the other they leave those truths which they believe to have been freely
left open to the researches of political inquiry. Thus the Catholics of the
United States are at the same time the most faithful believers and the most
zealous citizens.
It may be asserted that in the United States no religious
doctrine displays the slightest hostility to democratic and republican
institutions. The clergy of all the different sects hold the same language,
their opinions are consonant to the laws, and the human intellect flows onwards
in one sole current.
I happened to be staying in one of the largest towns in the
Union, when I was invited to attend a public meeting which had been called for
the purpose of assisting the Poles, and of sending them supplies of arms and
money. I found two or three thousand persons collected in a vast hall which had
been prepared to receive them. In a short time a priest in his ecclesiastical
robes advanced to the front of the hustings: the spectators rose, and stood
uncovered, whilst he spoke in the following terms: -
"Almighty God! the God of Armies! Thou who didst strengthen
the hearts and guide the arms of our fathers when they were fighting for the
sacred rights of national independence; Thou who didst make them triumph over a
hateful oppression, and hast granted to our people the benefits of liberty and
peace; Turn, O Lord, a favorable eye upon the other hemisphere; pitifully look
down upon that heroic nation which is even now struggling as we did in the
former time, and for the same rights which we defended with our blood. Thou,
who didst create Man in the likeness of the same image, let not tyranny mar Thy
work, and establish inequality upon the earth. Almighty God! do Thou watch over
the destiny of the Poles, and render them worthy to be free. May Thy wisdom
direct their councils, and may Thy strength sustain their arms! Shed forth Thy
terror over their enemies, scatter the powers which take counsel against them;
and vouchsafe that the injustice which the world has witnessed for fifty years,
be not consummated in our time. O Lord, who holdest alike the hearts of nations
and of men in Thy powerful hand; raise up allies to the sacred cause of right;
arouse the French nation from the apathy in which its rulers retain it, that it
go forth again to fight for the liberties of the world.
"Lord, turn not Thou Thy face from us, and grant that we may
always be the most religious as well as the freest people of the earth.
Almighty God, hear our supplications this day. Save the Poles, we beseech Thee,
in the name of Thy well-beloved Son, our Lord Jesus Christ, who died upon the
cross for the salvation of men. Amen."
The whole meeting responded "Amen!" with devotion.
Indirect Influence Of Religious Opinions Upon Political
Society In The United States
Christian morality common to all sects - Influence of religion
upon the manners of the Americans - Respect for the marriage tie - In what
manner religion confines the imagination of the Americans within certain
limits, and checks the passion of innovation - Opinion of the Americans on the
political utility of religion - Their exertions to extend and secure its
predominance.
I have just shown what the direct influence of religion upon
politics is in the United States, but its indirect influence appears to me to
be still more considerable, and it never instructs the Americans more fully in
the art of being free than when it says nothing of freedom.
The sects which exist in the United States are innumerable.
They all differ in respect to the worship which is due from man to his Creator,
but they all agree in respect to the duties which are due from man to man. Each
sect adores the Deity in its own peculiar manner, but all the sects preach the
same moral law in the name of God. If it be of the highest importance to man,
as an individual, that his religion should be true, the case of society is not
the same. Society has no future life to hope for or to fear; and provided the
citizens profess a religion, the peculiar tenets of that religion are of very
little importance to its interests. Moreover, almost all the sects of the
United States are comprised within the great unity of Christianity, and
Christian morality is everywhere the same.
It may be believed without unfairness that a certain number of
Americans pursue a peculiar form of worship, from habit more than from
conviction. In the United States the sovereign authority is religious, and
consequently hypocrisy must be common; but there is no country in the whole
world in which the Christian religion retains a greater influence over the
souls of men than in America; and there can be no greater proof of its utility,
and of its conformity to human nature, than that its influence is most
powerfully felt over the most enlightened and free nation of the earth.
I have remarked that the members of the American clergy in
general, without even excepting those who do not admit religious liberty, are
all in favor of civil freedom; but they do not support any particular political
system. They keep aloof from parties and from public affairs. In the United
States religion exercises but little influence upon the laws and upon the
details of public opinion, but it directs the manners of the community, and by
regulating domestic life it regulates the State.
I do not question that the great austerity of manners which is
observable in the United States, arises, in the first instance, from religious
faith. Religion is often unable to restrain man from the numberless temptations
of fortune; nor can it check that passion for gain which every incident of his
life contributes to arouse, but its influence over the mind of woman is
supreme, and women are the protectors of morals. There is certainly no country
in the world where the tie of marriage is so much respected as in America, or
where conjugal happiness is more highly or worthily appreciated. In Europe
almost all the disturbances of society arise from the irregularities of
domestic life. To despise the natural bonds and legitimate pleasures of home,
is to contract a taste for excesses, a restlessness of heart, and the evil of
fluctuating desires. Agitated by the tumultuous passions which frequently
disturb his dwelling, the European is galled by the obedience which the
legislative powers of the State exact. But when the American retires from the
turmoil of public life to the bosom of his family, he finds in it the image of
order and of peace. There his pleasures are simple and natural, his joys are
innocent and calm; and as he finds that an orderly life is the surest path to
happiness, he accustoms himself without difficulty to moderate his opinions as
well as his tastes. Whilst the European endeavors to forget his domestic
troubles by agitating society, the American derives from his own home that love
of order which he afterwards carries with him into public affairs.
In the United States the influence of religion is not confined
to the manners, but it extends to the intelligence of the people. Amongst the
Anglo-Americans, there are some who profess the doctrines of Christianity from
a sincere belief in them, and others who do the same because they are afraid to
be suspected of unbelief. Christianity, therefore, reigns without any obstacle,
by universal consent; the consequence is, as I have before observed, that every
principle of the moral world is fixed and determinate, although the political
world is abandoned to the debates and the experiments of men. Thus the human
mind is never left to wander across a boundless field; and, whatever may be its
pretensions, it is checked from time to time by barriers which it cannot
surmount. Before it can perpetrate innovation, certain primal and immutable
principles are laid down, and the boldest conceptions of human device are
subjected to certain forms which retard and stop their completion.
The imagination of the Americans, even in its greatest flights,
is circumspect and undecided; its impulses are checked, and its works
unfinished. These habits of restraint recur in political society, and are
singularly favorable both to the tranquillity of the people and to the
durability of the institutions it has established. Nature and circumstances
concurred to make the inhabitants of the United States bold men, as is
sufficiently attested by the enterprising spirit with which they seek for
fortune. If the mind of the Americans were free from all trammels, they would
very shortly become the most daring innovators and the most implacable
disputants in the world. But the revolutionists of America are obliged to
profess an ostensible respect for Christian morality and equity, which does not
easily permit them to violate the laws that oppose their designs; nor would
they find it easy to surmount the scruples of their partisans, even if they
were able to get over their own. Hitherto no one in the United States has dared
to advance the maxim, that everything is permissible with a view to the
interests of society; an impious adage which seems to have been invented in an
age of freedom to shelter all the tyrants of future ages. Thus whilst the law
permits the Americans to do what they please, religion prevents them from
conceiving, and forbids them to commit, what is rash or unjust.
Religion in America takes no direct part in the government of
society, but it must nevertheless be regarded as the foremost of the political
institutions of that country; for if it does not impart a taste for freedom, it
facilitates the use of free institutions. Indeed, it is in this same point of
view that the inhabitants of the United States themselves look upon religious
belief. I do not know whether all the Americans have a sincere faith in their
religion, for who can search the human heart? but I am certain that they hold
it to be indispensable to the maintenance of republican institutions. This
opinion is not peculiar to a class of citizens or to a party, but it belongs to
the whole nation, and to every rank of society.
In the United States, if a political character attacks a sect,
this may not prevent even the partisans of that very sect from supporting him;
but if he attacks all the sects together, everyone abandons him, and he remains
alone.
Whilst I was in America, a witness, who happened to be called
at the assizes of the county of Chester (State of New York), declared that he
did not believe in the existence of God, or in the immortality of the soul. The
judge refused to admit his evidence, on the ground that the witness had
destroyed beforehand all the confidence of the Court in what he was about to
say.e The newspapers related the fact without any
further comment.
The Americans combine the notions of Christianity and of
liberty so intimately in their minds, that it is impossible to make them
conceive the one without the other; and with them this conviction does not
spring from that barren traditionary faith which seems to vegetate in the soul
rather than to live.
I have known of societies formed by the Americans to send out
ministers of the Gospel into the new Western States to found schools and
churches there, lest religion should be suffered to die away in those remote
settlements, and the rising States be less fitted to enjoy free institutions
than the people from which they emanated. I met with wealthy New Englanders who
abandoned the country in which they were born in order to lay the foundations
of Christianity and of freedom on the banks of the Missouri, or in the prairies
of Illinois. Thus religious zeal is perpetually stimulated in the United States
by the duties of patriotism. These men do not act from an exclusive
consideration of the promises of a future life; eternity is only one motive of
their devotion to the cause; and if you converse with these missionaries of
Christian civilization, you will be surprised to find how much value they set
upon the goods of this world, and that you meet with a politician where you
expected to find a priest. They will tell you that "all the American republics
are collectively involved with each other; if the republics of the West were to
fall into anarchy, or to be mastered by a despot, the republican institutions
which now flourish upon the shores of the Atlantic Ocean would be in great
peril. It is, therefore, our interest that the new States should be religious,
in order to maintain our liberties."
Such are the opinions of the Americans, and if any hold that
the religious spirit which I admire is the very thing most amiss in America,
and that the only element wanting to the freedom and happiness of the human
race is to believe in some blind cosmogony, or to assert with Cabanis the
secretion of thought by the brain, I can only reply that those who hold this
language have never been in America, and that they have never seen a religious
or a free nation. When they return from their expedition, we shall hear what
they have to say.
There are persons in France who look upon republican
institutions as a temporary means of power, of wealth, and distinction; men who
are the condottieri of liberty, and who fight for their own advantage, whatever
be the colors they wear: it is not to these that I address myself. But there
are others who look forward to the republican form of government as a tranquil
and lasting state, towards which modern society is daily impelled by the ideas
and manners of the time, and who sincerely desire to prepare men to be free.
When these men attack religious opinions, they obey the dictates of their
passions to the prejudice of their interests. Despotism may govern without
faith, but liberty cannot. Religion is much more necessary in the republic
which they set forth in glowing colors than in the monarchy which they attack;
and it is more needed in democratic republics than in any others. How is it
possible that society should escape destruction if the moral tie be not
strengthened in proportion as the political tie is relaxed? and what can be
done with a people which is its own master, if it be not submissive to the
Divinity?
d It is difficult
to ascertain with accuracy the amount of the Roman Catholic population of the
United States, but in 1868 an able writer in the "Edinburgh Review" (vol.
cxxvii. p. 521) affirmed that the whole Catholic population of the United
States was then about 4,000,000, divided into 43 dioceses, with 3,795 churches,
under the care of 45 bishops and 2,317 clergymen. But this rapid increase is
mainly supported by immigration from the Catholic countries of
Europe.
e The New York
"Spectator" of August 23, 1831, relates the fact in the following terms: - "The
Court of Common Pleas of Chester county (New York) a few days since rejected a
witness who declared his disbelief in the existence of God. The presiding judge
remarked that he had not before been aware that there was a man living who did
not believe in the existence of God; that this belief constituted the sanction
of all testimony in a court of justice, and that he knew of no cause in a
Christian country where a witness had been permitted to testify without such
belief."
Principal Causes Which Render Religion Powerful In
America
Care taken by the Americans to separate the Church from the
State - The laws, public opinion, and even the exertions of the clergy concur
to promote this end - Influence of religion upon the mind in the United States
attributable to this cause - Reason of this - What is the natural state of men
with regard to religion at the present time - What are the peculiar and
incidental causes which prevent men, in certain countries, from arriving at
this state.
The philosophers of the eighteenth century explained the
gradual decay of religious faith in a very simple manner. Religious zeal, said
they, must necessarily fail, the more generally liberty is established and
knowledge diffused. Unfortunately, facts are by no means in accordance with
their theory. There are certain populations in Europe whose unbelief is only
equalled by their ignorance and their debasement, whilst in America one of the
freest and most enlightened nations in the world fulfils all the outward duties
of religious fervor.
Upon my arrival in the United States, the religious aspect of
the country was the first thing that struck my attention; and the longer I
stayed there the more did I perceive the great political consequences resulting
from this state of things, to which I was unaccustomed. In France I had almost
always seen the spirit of religion and the spirit of freedom pursuing courses
diametrically opposed to each other; but in America I found that they were
intimately united, and that they reigned in common over the same country. My
desire to discover the causes of this phenomenon increased from day to day. In
order to satisfy it I questioned the members of all the different sects; and I
more especially sought the society of the clergy, who are the depositaries of
the different persuasions, and who are more especially interested in their
duration. As a member of the Roman Catholic Church I was more particularly
brought into contact with several of its priests, with whom I became intimately
acquainted. To each of these men I expressed my astonishment and I explained my
doubts; I found that they differed upon matters of detail alone; and that they
mainly attributed the peaceful dominion of religion in their country to the
separation of Church and State. I do not hesitate to affirm that during my stay
in America I did not meet with a single individual, of the clergy or of the
laity, who was not of the same opinion upon this point.
This led me to examine more attentively than I had hitherto
done, the station which the American clergy occupy in political society. I
learned with surprise that they filled no public appointments;f not one of them is to be met with in the
administration, and they are not even represented in the legislative
assemblies. In several Statesg the law excludes
them from political life, public opinion in all. And when I came to inquire
into the prevailing spirit of the clergy I found that most of its members
seemed to retire of their own accord from the exercise of power, and that they
made it the pride of their profession to abstain from politics.
I heard them inveigh against ambition and deceit, under
whatever political opinions these vices might chance to lurk; but I learned
from their discourses that men are not guilty in the eye of God for any
opinions concerning political government which they may profess with sincerity,
any more than they are for their mistakes in building a house or in driving a
furrow. I perceived that these ministers of the gospel eschewed all parties
with the anxiety attendant upon personal interest. These facts convinced me
that what I had been told was true; and it then became my object to investigate
their causes, and to inquire how it happened that the real authority of
religion was increased by a state of things which diminished its apparent
force: these causes did not long escape my researches.
The short space of threescore years can never content the
imagination of man; nor can the imperfect joys of this world satisfy his heart.
Man alone, of all created beings, displays a natural contempt of existence, and
yet a boundless desire to exist; he scorns life, but he dreads annihilation.
These different feelings incessantly urge his soul to the contemplation of a
future state, and religion directs his musings thither. Religion, then, is
simply another form of hope; and it is no less natural to the human heart than
hope itself. Men cannot abandon their religious faith without a kind of
aberration of intellect, and a sort of violent distortion of their true
natures; but they are invincibly brought back to more pious sentiments; for
unbelief is an accident, and faith is the only permanent state of mankind. If
we only consider religious institutions in a purely human point of view, they
may be said to derive an inexhaustible element of strength from man himself,
since they belong to one of the constituent principles of human nature.
I am aware that at certain times religion may strengthen this
influence, which originates in itself, by the artificial power of the laws, and
by the support of those temporal institutions which direct society. Religions,
intimately united to the governments of the earth, have been known to exercise
a sovereign authority derived from the twofold source of terror and of faith;
but when a religion contracts an alliance of this nature, I do not hesitate to
affirm that it commits the same error as a man who should sacrifice his future
to his present welfare; and in obtaining a power to which it has no claim, it
risks that authority which is rightfully its own. When a religion founds its
empire upon the desire of immortality which lives in every human heart, it may
aspire to universal dominion; but when it connects itself with a government, it
must necessarily adopt maxims which are only applicable to certain nations.
Thus, in forming an alliance with a political power, religion augments its
authority over a few, and forfeits the hope of reigning over all.
As long as a religion rests upon those sentiments which are the
consolation of all affliction, it may attract the affections of mankind. But if
it be mixed up with the bitter passions of the world, it may be constrained to
defend allies whom its interests, and not the principle of love, have given to
it; or to repel as antagonists men who are still attached to its own spirit,
however opposed they may be to the powers to which it is allied. The Church
cannot share the temporal power of the State without being the object of a
portion of that animosity which the latter excites.
The political powers which seem to be most firmly established
have frequently no better guarantee for their duration than the opinions of a
generation, the interests of the time, or the life of an individual. A law may
modify the social condition which seems to be most fixed and determinate; and
with the social condition everything else must change. The powers of society
are more or less fugitive, like the years which we spend upon the earth; they
succeed each other with rapidity, like the fleeting cares of life; and no
government has ever yet been founded upon an invariable disposition of the
human heart, or upon an imperishable interest.
As long as a religion is sustained by those feelings,
propensities, and passions which are found to occur under the same forms, at
all the different periods of history, it may defy the efforts of time; or at
least it can only be destroyed by another religion. But when religion clings to
the interests of the world, it becomes almost as fragile a thing as the powers
of earth. It is the only one of them all which can hope for immortality; but if
it be connected with their ephemeral authority, it shares their fortunes, and
may fall with those transient passions which supported them for a day. The
alliance which religion contracts with political powers must needs be onerous
to itself; since it does not require their assistance to live, and by giving
them its assistance to live, and by giving them its assistance it may be
exposed to decay.
The danger which I have just pointed out always exists, but it
is not always equally visible. In some ages governments seem to be
imperishable; in others, the existence of society appears to be more precarious
than the life of man. Some constitutions plunge the citizens into a lethargic
somnolence, and others rouse them to feverish excitement. When governments
appear to be so strong, and laws so stable, men do not perceive the dangers
which may accrue from a union of Church and State. When governments display so
much weakness, and laws so much inconstancy, the danger is self-evident, but it
is no longer possible to avoid it; to be effectual, measures must be taken to
discover its approach.
In proportion as a nation assumes a democratic condition of
society, and as communities display democratic propensities, it becomes more
and more dangerous to connect religion with political institutions; for the
time is coming when authority will be bandied from hand to hand, when political
theories will succeed each other, and when men, laws, and constitutions will
disappear, or be modified from day to day, and this, not for a season only, but
unceasingly. Agitation and mutability are inherent in the nature of democratic
republics, just as stagnation and inertness are the law of absolute monarchies.
If the Americans, who change the head of the Government once in
four years, who elect new legislators every two years, and renew the provincial
officers every twelvemonth; if the Americans, who have abandoned the political
world to the attempts of innovators, had not placed religion beyond their
reach, where could it abide in the ebb and flow of human opinions? where would
that respect which belongs to it be paid, amidst the struggles of faction? and
what would become of its immortality, in the midst of perpetual decay? The
American clergy were the first to perceive this truth, and to act in conformity
with it. They saw that they must renounce their religious influence, if they
were to strive for political power; and they chose to give up the support of
the State, rather than to share its vicissitudes.
In America, religion is perhaps less powerful than it has been
at certain periods in the history of certain peoples; but its influence is more
lasting. It restricts itself to its own resources, but of those none can
deprive it: its circle is limited to certain principles, but those principles
are entirely its own, and under its undisputed control.
On every side in Europe we hear voices complaining of the
absence of religious faith, and inquiring the means of restoring to religion
some remnant of its pristine authority. It seems to me that we must first
attentively consider what ought to be the natural state of men with regard to
religion at the present time; and when we know what we have to hope and to
fear, we may discern the end to which our efforts ought to be directed.
The two great dangers which threaten the existence of religions
are schism and indifference. In ages of fervent devotion, men sometimes abandon
their religion, but they only shake it off in order to adopt another. Their
faith changes the objects to which it is directed, but it suffers no decline.
The old religion then excites enthusiastic attachment or bitter enmity in
either party; some leave it with anger, others cling to it with increased
devotedness, and although persuasions differ, irreligion is unknown. Such,
however, is not the case when a religious belief is secretly undermined by
doctrines which may be termed negative, since they deny the truth of one
religion without affirming that of any other. Progidious revolutions then take
place in the human mind, without the apparent co-operation of the passions of
man, and almost without his knowledge. Men lose the objects of their fondest
hopes, as if through forgetfulness. They are carried away by an imperceptible
current which they have not the courage to stem, but which they follow with
regret, since it bears them from a faith they love, to a scepticism that
plunges them into despair.
In ages which answer to this description, men desert their
religious opinions from lukewarmness rather than from dislike; they do not
reject them, but the sentiments by which they were once fostered disappear. But
if the unbeliever does not admit religion to be true, he still considers it
useful. Regarding religious institutions in a human point of view, he
acknowledges their influence upon manners and legislation. He admits that they
may serve to make men live in peace with one another, and to prepare them
gently for the hour of death. He regrets the faith which he has lost; and as he
is deprived of a treasure which he has learned to estimate at its full value,
he scruples to take it from those who still possess it.
On the other hand, those who continue to believe are not afraid
openly to avow their faith. They look upon those who do not share their
persuasion as more worthy of pity than of opposition; and they are aware that
to acquire the esteem of the unbelieving, they are not obliged to follow their
example. They are hostile to no one in the world; and as they do not consider
the society in which they live as an arena in which religion is bound to face
its thousand deadly foes, they love their contemporaries, whilst they condemn
their weaknesses and lament their errors.
As those who do not believe, conceal their incredulity; and as
those who believe, display their faith, public opinion pronounces itself in
favor of religion: love, support, and honor are bestowed upon it, and it is
only by searching the human soul that we can detect the wounds which it has
received. The mass of mankind, who are never without the feeling of religion,
do not perceive anything at variance with the established faith. The
instinctive desire of a future life brings the crowd about the altar, and opens
the hearts of men to the precepts and consolations of religion.
But this picture is not applicable to us: for there are men
amongst us who have ceased to believe in Christianity, without adopting any
other religion; others who are in the perplexities of doubt, and who already
affect not to believe; and others, again, who are afraid to avow that Christian
faith which they still cherish in secret.
Amidst these lukewarm partisans and ardent antagonists a small
number of believers exist, who are ready to brave all obstacles and to scorn
all dangers in defence of their faith. They have done violence to human
weakness, in order to rise superior to public opinion. Excited by the effort
they have made, they scarcely knew where to stop; and as they know that the
first use which the French made of independence was to attack religion, they
look upon their contemporaries with dread, and they recoil in alarm from the
liberty which their fellow-citizens are seeking to obtain. As unbelief appears
to them to be a novelty, they comprise all that is new in one indiscriminate
animosity. They are at war with their age and country, and they look upon every
opinion which is put forth there as the necessary enemy of the faith.
Such is not the natural state of men with regard to religion at
the present day; and some extraordinary or incidental cause must be at work in
France to prevent the human mind from following its original propensities and
to drive it beyond the limits at which it ought naturally to stop. I am
intimately convinced that this extraordinary and incidental cause is the close
connection of politics and religion. The unbelievers of Europe attack the
Christians as their political opponents, rather than as their religious
adversaries; they hate the Christian religion as the opinion of a party, much
more than as an error of belief; and they reject the clergy less because they
are the representatives of the Divinity than because they are the allies of
authority.
In Europe, Christianity has been intimately united to the
powers of the earth. Those powers are now in decay, and it is, as it were,
buried under their ruins. The living body of religion has been bound down to
the dead corpse of superannuated polity: cut but the bonds which restrain it,
and that which is alive will rise once more. I know not what could restore the
Christian Church of Europe to the energy of its earlier days; that power
belongs to God alone; but it may be the effect of human policy to leave the
faith in the full exercise of the strength which it still retains.
How The Instruction, The Habits, And The Practical Experience
Of The Americans Promote The Success Of Their Democratic Institutions
What is to be understood by the instruction of the American
people - The human mind more superficially instructed in the United States than
in Europe - No one completely uninstructed - Reason of this - Rapidity with
which opinions are diffused even in the uncultivated States of the West -
Practical experience more serviceable to the Americans than book-learning.
I have but little to add to what I have already said concerning
the influence which the instruction and the habits of the Americans exercise
upon the maintenance of their political institutions.
America has hitherto produced very few writers of distinction;
it possesses no great historians, and not a single eminent poet. The
inhabitants of that country look upon what are properly styled literary
pursuits with a kind of disapprobation; and there are towns of very second-rate
importance in Europe in which more literary works are annually published than
in the twenty-four States of the Union put together. The spirit of the
Americans is averse to general ideas; and it does not seek theoretical
discoveries. Neither politics nor manufactures direct them to these
occupations; and although new laws are perpetually enacted in the United
States, no great writers have hitherto inquired into the general principles of
their legislation. The Americans have lawyers and commentators, but no
jurists;h and they furnish examples rather than
lessons to the world. The same observation applies to the mechanical arts. In
America, the inventions of Europe are adopted with sagacity; they are
perfected, and adapted with admirable skill to the wants of the country.
Manufactures exist, but the science of manufacture is not cultivated; and they
have good workmen, but very few inventors. Fulton was obliged to proffer his
services to foreign nations for a long time before he was able to devote them
to his own country.
The observer who is desirous of forming an opinion on the state
of instruction amongst the Anglo-Americans must consider the same object from
two different points of view. If he only singles out the learned, he will be
astonished to find how rare they are; but if he counts the ignorant, the
American people will appear to be the most enlightened community in the world.
The whole population, as I observed in another place, is situated between these
two extremes. In New England, every citizen receives the elementary notions of
human knowledge; he is moreover taught the doctrines and the evidences of his
religion, the history of his country, and the leading features of its
Constitution. In the States of Connecticut and Massachusetts, it is extremely
rare to find a man imperfectly acquainted with all these things, and a person
wholly ignorant of them is a sort of phenomenon.
When I compare the Greek and Roman republics with these
American States; the manuscript libraries of the former, and their rude
population, with the innumerable journals and the enlightened people of the
latter; when I remember all the attempts which are made to judge the modern
republics by the assistance of those of antiquity, and to infer what will
happen in our time from what took place two thousand years ago, I am tempted to
burn my books, in order to apply none but novel ideas to so novel a condition
of society.
What I have said of New England must not, however, be applied
indistinctly to the whole Union; as we advance towards the West or the South,
the instruction of the people diminishes. In the States which are adjacent to
the Gulf of Mexico, a certain number of individuals may be found, as in our own
countries, who are devoid of the rudiments of instruction. But there is not a
single district in the United States sunk in complete ignorance; and for a very
simple reason: the peoples of Europe started from the darkness of a barbarous
condition, to advance toward the light of civilization; their progress has been
unequal; some of them have improved apace, whilst others have loitered in their
course, and some have stopped, and are still sleeping upon the way.i
Such has not been the case in the United States. The Anglo-
Americans settled in a state of civilization, upon that territory which their
descendants occupy; they had not to begin to learn, and it was sufficient for
them not to forget. Now the children of these same Americans are the persons
who, year by year, transport their dwellings into the wilds; and with their
dwellings their acquired information and their esteem for knowledge. Education
has taught them the utility of instruction, and has enabled them to transmit
that instruction to their posterity. In the United States society has no
infancy, but it is born in man's estate.
The Americans never use the word "peasant," because they have
no idea of the peculiar class which that term denotes; the ignorance of more
remote ages, the simplicity of rural life, and the rusticity of the villager
have not been preserved amongst them; and they are alike unacquainted with the
virtues, the vices, the coarse habits, and the simple graces of an early stage
of civilization. At the extreme borders of the Confederate States, upon the
confines of society and of the wilderness, a population of bold adventurers
have taken up their abode, who pierce the solitudes of the American woods, and
seek a country there, in order to escape that poverty which awaited them in
their native provinces. As soon as the pioneer arrives upon the spot which is
to serve him for a retreat, he fells a few trees and builds a loghouse. Nothing
can offer a more miserable aspect than these isolated dwellings. The traveller
who approaches one of them towards nightfall, sees the flicker of the
hearth-flame through the chinks in the walls; and at night, if the wind rises,
he hears the roof of boughs shake to and fro in the midst of the great forest
trees. Who would not suppose that this poor hut is the asylum of rudeness and
ignorance? Yet no sort of comparison can be drawn between the pioneer and the
dwelling which shelters him. Everything about him is primitive and unformed,
but he is himself the result of the labor and the experience of eighteen
centuries. He wears the dress, and he speaks the language of cities; he is
acquainted with the past, curious of the future, and ready for argument upon
the present; he is, in short, a highly civilized being, who consents, for a
time, to inhabit the backwoods, and who penetrates into the wilds of the New
World with the Bible, an axe, and a file of newspapers.
It is difficult to imagine the incredible rapidity with which
public opinion circulates in the midst of these deserts.j I do not think that so much intellectual intercourse
takes place in the most enlightened and populous districts of France.k It cannot be doubted that, in the United States, the
instruction of the people powerfully contributes to the support of a democratic
republic; and such must always be the case, I believe, where instruction which
awakens the understanding is not separated from moral education which amends
the heart. But I by no means exaggerate this benefit, and I am still further
from thinking, as so many people do think in Europe, that men can be
instantaneously made citizens by teaching them to read and write. True
information is mainly derived from experience; and if the Americans had not
been gradually accustomed to govern themselves, their book-learning would not
assist them much at the present day.
I have lived a great deal with the people in the United States,
and I cannot express how much I admire their experience and their good sense.
An American should never be allowed to speak of Europe; for he will then
probably display a vast deal of presumption and very foolish pride. He will
take up with those crude and vague notions which are so useful to the ignorant
all over the world. But if you question him respecting his own country, the
cloud which dimmed his intelligence will immediately disperse; his language
will become as clear and as precise as his thoughts. He will inform you what
his rights are, and by what means he exercises them; he will be able to point
out the customs which obtain in the political world. You will find that he is
well acquainted with the rules of the administration, and that he is familiar
with the mechanism of the laws. The citizen of the United States does not
acquire his practical science and his positive notions from books; the
instruction he has acquired may have prepared him for receiving those ideas,
but it did not furnish them. The American learns to know the laws by
participating in the act of legislation; and he takes a lesson in the forms of
government from governing. The great work of society is ever going on beneath
his eyes, and, as it were, under his hands.
In the United States politics are the end and aim of education;
in Europe its principal object is to fit men for private life. The interference
of the citizens in public affairs is too rare an occurrence for it to be
anticipated beforehand. Upon casting a glance over society in the two
hemispheres, these differences are indicated even by its external aspect.
In Europe we frequently introduce the ideas and the habits of
private life into public affairs; and as we pass at once from the domestic
circle to the government of the State, we may frequently be heard to discuss
the great interests of society in the same manner in which we converse with our
friends. The Americans, on the other hand, transfuse the habits of public life
into their manners in private; and in their country the jury is introduced into
the games of schoolboys, and parliamentary forms are observed in the order of a
feast.
f Unless this term be
applied to the functions which many of them fill in the schools. Almost all
education is entrusted to the clergy.
g See the
Constitution of New York, art. 7, Section 4: -
"And whereas the ministers of the gospel are,
by their profession, dedicated to the service of God and the care of souls, and
ought not to be diverted from the great duties of their functions: therefore no
minister of the gospel, or priest of any denomination whatsoever, shall at any
time hereafter, under any pretence or description whatever, be eligible to, or
capable of holding, any civil or military office or place within this State."
See also the constitutions of North Carolina,
art. 31; Virginia; South Carolina, art. I, Section 23; Kentucky, art. 2,
Section 26; Tennessee, art. 8, Section I; Louisiana, art. 2, Section
22.
h This cannot be
said with truth of the country of Kent, Story, and Wheaton.
i In the Northern
States the number of persons destitute of instruction is inconsiderable, the
largest number being 241,152 in the State of New York (according to Spaulding's
"Handbook of American Statistics" for 1874); but in the South no less than
1,516,339 whites and 2,671,396 colored persons are returned as
"illiterate."
j I travelled along a
portion of the frontier of the United States in a sort of cart which was termed
the mail. We passed, day and night, with great rapidity along the roads which
were scarcely marked out, through immense forests; when the gloom of the woods
became impenetrable the coachman lighted branches of fir, and we journeyed
along by the light they cast. From time to time we came to a hut in the midst
of the forest, which was a post- office. The mail dropped an enormous bundle of
letters at the door of this isolated dwelling, and we pursued our way at full
gallop, leaving the inhabitants of the neighboring log houses to send for their
share of the treasure.
[When the author visited America the
locomotive and the railroad were scarcely invented, and not yet introduced in
the United States. It is superfluous to point out the immense effect of those
inventions in extending civilization and developing the resources of that vast
continent. In 1831 there were 51 miles of railway in the United States; in 1872
there were 60,000 miles of railway.]
k In 1832 each
inhabitant of Michigan paid a sum equivalent to 1 fr. 22 cent. (French money)
to the post-office revenue, and each inhabitant of the Floridas paid 1 fr. 5
cent. (See "National Calendar," 1833, p. 244.) In the same year each inhabitant
of the Departement du Nord paid 1 fr. 4 cent. to the revenue of the French
post-office. (See the "Compte rendu de l'administration des Finances," 1833, p.
623.) Now the State of Michigan only contained at that time 7 inhabitants per
square league and Florida only 5: the public instruction and the commercial
activity of these districts is inferior to that of most of the States in the
Union, whilst the Departement du Nord, which contains 3,400 inhabitants per
square league, is one of the most enlightened and manufacturing parts of
France.
The Laws Contribute More To The Maintenance Of The Democratic
Republic In The United States Than The Physical Circumstances Of The Country,
And The Manners More Than The Laws
All the nations of America have a democratic state of society -
Yet democratic institutions only subsist amongst the Anglo-Americans - The
Spaniards of South America, equally favored by physical causes as the
Anglo-Americans, unable to maintain a democratic republic - Mexico, which has
adopted the Constitution of the United States, in the same predicament - The
Anglo-Americans of the West less able to maintain it than those of the East -
Reason of these different results.
I have remarked that the maintenance of democratic institutions
in the United States is attributable to the circumstances, the laws, and the
manners of that country.l Most Europeans are only
acquainted with the first of these three causes, and they are apt to give it a
preponderating importance which it does not really possess.
It is true that the Anglo-Saxons settled in the New World in a
state of social equality; the low-born and the noble were not to be found
amongst them; and professional prejudices were always as entirely unknown as
the prejudices of birth. Thus, as the condition of society was democratic, the
empire of democracy was established without difficulty. But this circumstance
is by no means peculiar to the United States; almost all the trans-Atlantic
colonies were founded by men equal amongst themselves, or who became so by
inhabiting them. In no one part of the New World have Europeans been able to
create an aristocracy. Nevertheless, democratic institutions prosper nowhere
but in the United States.
The American Union has no enemies to contend with; it stands in
the wilds like an island in the ocean. But the Spaniards of South America were
no less isolated by nature; yet their position has not relieved them from the
charge of standing armies. They make war upon each other when they have no
foreign enemies to oppose; and the Anglo-American democracy is the only one
which has hitherto been able to maintain itself in peace.m
The territory of the Union presents a boundless field to human
activity, and inexhaustible materials for industry and labor. The passion of
wealth takes the place of ambition, and the warmth of faction is mitigated by a
sense of prosperity. But in what portion of the globe shall we meet with more
fertile plains, with mightier rivers, or with more unexplored and inexhaustible
riches than in South America?
Nevertheless, South America has been unable to maintain
democratic institutions. If the welfare of nations depended on their being
placed in a remote position, with an unbounded space of habitable territory
before them, the Spaniards of South America would have no reason to complain of
their fate. And although they might enjoy less prosperity than the inhabitants
of the United States, their lot might still be such as to excite the envy of
some nations in Europe. There are, however, no nations upon the face of the
earth more miserable than those of South America.
Thus, not only are physical causes inadequate to produce
results analogous to those which occur in North America, but they are unable to
raise the population of South America above the level of European States, where
they act in a contrary direction. Physical causes do not, therefore, affect the
destiny of nations so much as has been supposed.
I have met with men in New England who were on the point of
leaving a country, where they might have remained in easy circumstances, to go
to seek their fortune in the wilds. Not far from that district I found a French
population in Canada, which was closely crowded on a narrow territory, although
the same wilds were at hand; and whilst the emigrant from the United States
purchased an extensive estate with the earnings of a short term of labor, the
Canadian paid as much for land as he would have done in France. Nature offers
the solitudes of the New World to Europeans; but they are not always acquainted
with the means of turning her gifts to account. Other peoples of America have
the same physical conditions of prosperity as the Anglo-Americans, but without
their laws and their manners; and these peoples are wretched. The laws and
manners of the Anglo-Americans are therefore that efficient cause of their
greatness which is the object of my inquiry.
I am far from supposing that the American laws are preeminently
good in themselves; I do not hold them to be applicable to all democratic
peoples; and several of them seem to be dangerous, even in the United States.
Nevertheless, it cannot be denied that the American legislation, taken
collectively, is extremely well adapted to the genius of the people and the
nature of the country which it is intended to govern. The American laws are
therefore good, and to them must be attributed a large portion of the success
which attends the government of democracy in America: but I do not believe them
to be the principal cause of that success; and if they seem to me to have more
influence upon the social happiness of the Americans than the nature of the
country, on the other hand there is reason to believe that their effect is
still inferior to that produced by the manners of the people.
The Federal laws undoubtedly constitute the most important part
of the legislation of the United States. Mexico, which is not less fortunately
situated than the Anglo-American Union, has adopted the same laws, but is
unable to accustom itself to the government of democracy. Some other cause is
therefore at work, independently of those physical circumstances and peculiar
laws which enable the democracy to rule in the United States.
Another still more striking proof may be adduced. Almost all
the inhabitants of the territory of the Union are the descendants of a common
stock; they speak the same language, they worship God in the same manner, they
are affected by the same physical causes, and they obey the same laws. Whence,
then, do their characteristic differences arise? Why, in the Eastern States of
the Union, does the republican government display vigor and regularity, and
proceed with mature deliberation? Whence does it derive the wisdom and the
durability which mark its acts, whilst in the Western States, on the contrary,
society seems to be ruled by the powers of chance? There, public business is
conducted with an irregularity and a passionate and feverish excitement, which
does not announce a long or sure duration.
I am no longer comparing the Anglo-American States to foreign
nations; but I am contrasting them with each other, and endeavoring to discover
why they are so unlike. The arguments which are derived from the nature of the
country and the difference of legislation are here all set aside. Recourse must
be had to some other cause; and what other cause can there be except the
manners of the people?
It is in the Eastern States that the Anglo-Americans have been
longest accustomed to the government of democracy, and that they have adopted
the habits and conceived the notions most favorable to its maintenance.
Democracy has gradually penetrated into their customs, their opinions, and the
forms of social intercourse; it is to be found in all the details of daily life
equally as in the laws. In the Eastern States the instruction and practical
education of the people have been most perfected, and religion has been most
thoroughly amalgamated with liberty. Now these habits, opinions, customs, and
convictions are precisely the constituent elements of that which I have
denominated manners.
In the Western States, on the contrary, a portion of the same
advantages is still wanting. Many of the Americans of the West were born in the
woods, and they mix the ideas and the customs of savage life with the
civilization of their parents. Their passions are more intense; their religious
morality less authoritative; and their convictions less secure. The inhabitants
exercise no sort of control over their fellow-citizens, for they are scarcely
acquainted with each other. The nations of the West display, to a certain
extent, the inexperience and the rude habits of a people in its infancy; for
although they are composed of old elements, their assemblage is of recent date.
The manners of the Americans of the United States are, then,
the real cause which renders that people the only one of the American nations
that is able to support a democratic government; and it is the influence of
manners which produces the different degrees of order and of prosperity that
may be distinguished in the several Anglo-American democracies. Thus the effect
which the geographical position of a country may have upon the duration of
democratic institutions is exaggerated in Europe. Too much importance is
attributed to legislation, too little to manners. These three great causes
serve, no doubt, to regulate and direct the American democracy; but if they
were to be classed in their proper order, I should say that the physical
circumstances are less efficient than the laws, and the laws very subordinate
to the manners of the people. I am convinced that the most advantageous
situation and the best possible laws cannot maintain a constitution in spite of
the manners of a country; whilst the latter may turn the most unfavorable
positions and the worst laws to some advantage. The importance of manners is a
common truth to which study and experience incessantly direct our attention. It
may be regarded as a central point in the range of human observation, and the
common termination of all inquiry. So seriously do I insist upon this head,
that if I have hitherto failed in making the reader feel the important
influence which I attribute to the practical experience, the habits, the
opinions, in short, to the manners of the Americans, upon the maintenance of
their institutions, I have failed in the principal object of my work.
Whether Laws And Manners Are Sufficient To Maintain
Democratic Institutions In Other Countries Besides America
The Anglo-Americans, if transported into Europe, would be
obliged to modify their laws - Distinction to be made between democratic
institutions and American institutions - Democratic laws may be conceived
better than, or at least different from, those which the American democracy has
adopted - The example of America only proves that it is possible to regulate
democracy by the assistance of manners and legislation.
I have asserted that the success of democratic institutions in
the United States is more intimately connected with the laws themselves, and
the manners of the people, than with the nature of the country. But does it
follow that the same causes would of themselves produce the same results, if
they were put into operation elsewhere; and if the country is no adequate
substitute for laws and manners, can laws and manners in their turn prove a
substitute for the country? It will readily be understood that the necessary
elements of a reply to this question are wanting: other peoples are to be found
in the New World besides the Anglo- Americans, and as these people are affected
by the same physical circumstances as the latter, they may fairly be compared
together. But there are no nations out of America which have adopted the same
laws and manners, being destitute of the physical advantages peculiar to the
Anglo-Americans. No standard of comparison therefore exists, and we can only
hazard an opinion upon this subject.
It appears to me, in the first place, that a careful
distinction must be made between the institutions of the United States and
democratic institutions in general. When I reflect upon the state of Europe,
its mighty nations, its populous cities, its formidable armies, and the complex
nature of its politics, I cannot suppose that even the Anglo-Americans, if they
were transported to our hemisphere, with their ideas, their religion, and their
manners, could exist without considerably altering their laws. But a democratic
nation may be imagined, organized differently from the American people. It is
not impossible to conceive a government really established upon the will of the
majority; but in which the majority, repressing its natural propensity to
equality, should consent, with a view to the order and the stability of the
State, to invest a family or an individual with all the prerogatives of the
executive. A democratic society might exist, in which the forces of the nation
would be more centralized than they are in the United States; the people would
exercise a less direct and less irresistible influence upon public affairs, and
yet every citizen invested with certain rights would participate, within his
sphere, in the conduct of the government. The observations I made amongst the
Anglo-Americans induce me to believe that democratic institutions of this kind,
prudently introduced into society, so as gradually to mix with the habits and
to be interfused with the opinions of the people, might subsist in other
countries besides America. If the laws of the United States were the only
imaginable democratic laws, or the most perfect which it is possible to
conceive, I should admit that the success of those institutions affords no
proof of the success of democratic institutions in general, in a country less
favored by natural circumstances. But as the laws of America appear to me to be
defective in several respects, and as I can readily imagine others of the same
general nature, the peculiar advantages of that country do not prove that
democratic institutions cannot succeed in a nation less favored by
circumstances, if ruled by better laws.
If human nature were different in America from what it is
elsewhere; or if the social condition of the Americans engendered habits and
opinions amongst them different from those which originate in the same social
condition in the Old World, the American democracies would afford no means of
predicting what may occur in other democracies. If the Americans displayed the
same propensities as all other democratic nations, and if their legislators had
relied upon the nature of the country and the favor of circumstances to
restrain those propensities within due limits, the prosperity of the United
States would be exclusively attributable to physical causes, and it would
afford no encouragement to a people inclined to imitate their example, without
sharing their natural advantages. But neither of these suppositions is borne
out by facts.
In America the same passions are to be met with as in Europe;
some originating in human nature, others in the democratic condition of
society. Thus in the United States I found that restlessness of heart which is
natural to men, when all ranks are nearly equal and the chances of elevation
are the same to all. I found the democratic feeling of envy expressed under a
thousand different forms. I remarked that the people frequently displayed, in
the conduct of affairs, a consummate mixture of ignorance and presumption; and
I inferred that in America, men are liable to the same failings and the same
absurdities as amongst ourselves. But upon examining the state of society more
attentively, I speedily discovered that the Americans had made great and
successful efforts to counteract these imperfections of human nature, and to
correct the natural defects of democracy. Their divers municipal laws appeared
to me to be a means of restraining the ambition of the citizens within a narrow
sphere, and of turning those same passions which might have worked havoc in the
State, to the good of the township or the parish. The American legislators have
succeeded to a certain extent in opposing the notion of rights to the feelings
of envy; the permanence of the religious world to the continual shifting of
politics; the experience of the people to its theoretical ignorance; and its
practical knowledge of business to the impatience of its desires.
The Americans, then, have not relied upon the nature of their
country to counterpoise those dangers which originate in their Constitution and
in their political laws. To evils which are common to all democratic peoples
they have applied remedies which none but themselves had ever thought of
before; and although they were the first to make the experiment, they have
succeeded in it.
The manners and laws of the Americans are not the only ones
which may suit a democratic people; but the Americans have shown that it would
be wrong to despair of regulating democracy by the aid of manners and of laws.
If other nations should borrow this general and pregnant idea from the
Americans, without however intending to imitate them in the peculiar
application which they have made of it; if they should attempt to fit
themselves for that social condition, which it seems to be the will of
Providence to impose upon the generations of this age, and so to escape from
the despotism or the anarchy which threatens them; what reason is there to
suppose that their efforts would not be crowned with success? The organization
and the establishment of democracy in Christendom is the great political
problem of the time. The Americans, unquestionably, have not resolved this
problem, but they furnish useful data to those who undertake the task.
Importance Of What Precedes With Respect To The State Of
Europe
It may readily be discovered with what intention I undertook the
foregoing inquiries. The question here discussed is interesting not only to the
United States, but to the whole world; it concerns, not a nation, but all
mankind. If those nations whose social condition is democratic could only
remain free as long as they are inhabitants of the wilds, we could not but
despair of the future destiny of the human race; for democracy is rapidly
acquiring a more extended sway, and the wilds are gradually peopled with men.
If it were true that laws and manners are insufficient to maintain democratic
institutions, what refuge would remain open to the nations, except the
despotism of a single individual? I am aware that there are many worthy persons
at the present time who are not alarmed at this latter alternative, and who are
so tired of liberty as to be glad of repose, far from those storms by which it
is attended. But these individuals are ill acquainted with the haven towards
which they are bound. They are so deluded by their recollections, as to judge
the tendency of absolute power by what it was formerly, and not by what it
might become at the present time.
If absolute power were re-established amongst the democratic
nations of Europe, I am persuaded that it would assume a new form, and appear
under features unknown to our forefathers. There was a time in Europe when the
laws and the consent of the people had invested princes with almost unlimited
authority; but they scarcely ever availed themselves of it. I do not speak of
the prerogatives of the nobility, of the authority of supreme courts of
justice, of corporations and their chartered rights, or of provincial
privileges, which served to break the blows of the sovereign authority, and to
maintain a spirit of resistance in the nation. Independently of these political
institutions - which, however opposed they might be to personal liberty, served
to keep alive the love of freedom in the mind of the public, and which may be
esteemed to have been useful in this respect - the manners and opinions of the
nation confined the royal authority within barriers which were not less
powerful, although they were less conspicuous. Religion, the affections of the
people, the benevolence of the prince, the sense of honor, family pride,
provincial prejudices, custom, and public opinion limited the power of kings,
and restrained their authority within an invisible circle. The constitution of
nations was despotic at that time, but their manners were free. Princes had the
right, but they had neither the means nor the desire, of doing whatever they
pleased.
But what now remains of those barriers which formerly arrested
the aggressions of tyranny? Since religion has lost its empire over the souls
of men, the most prominent boundary which divided good from evil is overthrown;
the very elements of the moral world are indeterminate; the princes and the
peoples of the earth are guided by chance, and none can define the natural
limits of despotism and the bounds of license. Long revolutions have forever
destroyed the respect which surrounded the rulers of the State; and since they
have been relieved from the burden of public esteem, princes may henceforward
surrender themselves without fear to the seductions of arbitrary power.
When kings find that the hearts of their subjects are turned
towards them, they are clement, because they are conscious of their strength,
and they are chary of the affection of their people, because the affection of
their people is the bulwark of the throne. A mutual interchange of good-will
then takes place between the prince and the people, which resembles the
gracious intercourse of domestic society. The subjects may murmur at the
sovereign's decree, but they are grieved to displease him; and the sovereign
chastises his subjects with the light hand of parental affection.
But when once the spell of royalty is broken in the tumult of
revolution; when successive monarchs have crossed the throne, so as alternately
to display to the people the weakness of their right and the harshness of their
power, the sovereign is no longer regarded by any as the Father of the State,
and he is feared by all as its master. If he be weak, he is despised; if he be
strong, he is detested. He himself is full of animosity and alarm; he finds
that he is as a stranger in his own country, and he treats his subjects like
conquered enemies.
When the provinces and the towns formed so many different
nations in the midst of their common country, each of them had a will of its
own, which was opposed to the general spirit of subjection; but now that all
the parts of the same empire, after having lost their immunities, their
customs, their prejudices, their traditions, and their names, are subjected and
accustomed to the same laws, it is not more difficult to oppress them
collectively than it was formerly to oppress them singly.
Whilst the nobles enjoyed their power, and indeed long after
that power was lost, the honor of aristocracy conferred an extraordinary degree
of force upon their personal opposition. They afford instances of men who,
notwithstanding their weakness, still entertained a high opinion of their
personal value, and dared to cope single-handed with the efforts of the public
authority. But at the present day, when all ranks are more and more confounded,
when the individual disappears in the throng, and is easily lost in the midst
of a common obscurity, when the honor of monarchy has almost lost its empire
without being succeeded by public virtue, and when nothing can enable man to
rise above himself, who shall say at what point the exigencies of power and the
servility of weakness will stop?
As long as family feeling was kept alive, the antagonist of
oppression was never alone; he looked about him, and found his clients, his
hereditary friends, and his kinsfolk. If this support was wanting, he was
sustained by his ancestors and animated by his posterity. But when patrimonial
estates are divided, and when a few years suffice to confound the distinctions
of a race, where can family feeling be found? What force can there be in the
customs of a country which has changed and is still perpetually changing, its
aspect; in which every act of tyranny has a precedent, and every crime an
example; in which there is nothing so old that its antiquity can save it from
destruction, and nothing so unparalleled that its novelty can prevent it from
being done? What resistance can be offered by manners of so pliant a make that
they have already often yielded? What strength can even public opinion have
retained, when no twenty persons are connected by a common tie; when not a man,
nor a family, nor chartered corporation, nor class, nor free institution, has
the power of representing or exerting that opinion; and when every citizen -
being equally weak, equally poor, and equally dependent - has only his personal
impotence to oppose to the organized force of the government?
The annals of France furnish nothing analogous to the condition
in which that country might then be thrown. But it may more aptly be
assimilated to the times of old, and to those hideous eras of Roman oppression,
when the manners of the people were corrupted, their traditions obliterated,
their habits destroyed, their opinions shaken, and freedom, expelled from the
laws, could find no refuge in the land; when nothing protected the citizens,
and the citizens no longer protected themselves; when human nature was the
sport of man, and princes wearied out the clemency of Heaven before they
exhausted the patience of their subjects. Those who hope to revive the monarchy
of Henry IV or of Louis XIV, appear to me to be afflicted with mental
blindness; and when I consider the present condition of several European
nations - a condition to which all the others tend - I am led to believe that
they will soon be left with no other alternative than democratic liberty, or
the tyranny of the Caesars.n
And indeed it is deserving of consideration, whether men are to
be entirely emancipated or entirely enslaved; whether their rights are to be
made equal, or wholly taken away from them. If the rulers of society were
reduced either gradually to raise the crowd to their own level, or to sink the
citizens below that of humanity, would not the doubts of many be resolved, the
consciences of many be healed, and the community prepared to make great
sacrifices with little difficulty? In that case, the gradual growth of
democratic manners and institutions should be regarded, not as the best, but as
the only means of preserving freedom; and without liking the government of
democracy, it might be adopted as the most applicable and the fairest remedy
for the present ills of society.
It is difficult to associate a people in the work of
government; but it is still more difficult to supply it with experience, and to
inspire it with the feelings which it requires in order to govern well. I grant
that the caprices of democracy are perpetual; its instruments are rude; its
laws imperfect. But if it were true that soon no just medium would exist
between the empire of democracy and the dominion of a single arm, should we not
rather incline towards the former than submit voluntarily to the latter? And if
complete equality be our fate, is it not better to be levelled by free
institutions than by despotic power?
Those who, after having read this book, should imagine that my
intention in writing it has been to propose the laws and manners of the
Anglo-Americans for the imitation of all democratic peoples, would commit a
very great mistake; they must have paid more attention to the form than to the
substance of my ideas. My aim has been to show, by the example of America, that
laws, and especially manners, may exist which will allow a democratic people to
remain free. But I am very far from thinking that we ought to follow the
example of the American democracy, and copy the means which it has employed to
attain its ends; for I am well aware of the influence which the nature of a
country and its political precedents exercise upon a constitution; and I should
regard it as a great misfortune for mankind if liberty were to exist all over
the world under the same forms.
But I am of opinion that if we do not succeed in gradually
introducing democratic institutions into France, and if we despair of imparting
to the citizens those ideas and sentiments which first prepare them for
freedom, and afterwards allow them to enjoy it, there will be no independence
at all, either for the middling classes or the nobility, for the poor or for
the rich, but an equal tyranny over all; and I foresee that if the peaceable
empire of the majority be not founded amongst us in time, we shall sooner or
later arrive at the unlimited authority of a single despot.
l I remind the reader
of the general signification which I give to the word "manners," namely, the
moral and intellectual characteristics of social man taken
collectively.
m A remark which,
since the great Civil War of 1861-65, ceases to be applicable.
n This prediction of
the return of France to imperial despotism, and of the true character of that
despotic power, was written in 1832, and realized to the letter in
1852.
 |
 |
 |