Jay's Thoughts on Stuff

Exodus 35:5-7  Take from among you an offering to YHWH. Whoever is of a willing heart, let him bring it, an offering of YHWH: gold, and silver, and bronze,  (6)  and blue, and purple, and scarlet, and bleached linen, and goats’ hair,  (7)  and rams’ skins dyed red, and badgers’ skins…

You’ll forgive me, I hope, if I engage in more speculative theology. I’d like to focus on the three coverings of the Tabernacle. They were each made of a different material: goats hair, red rams skin, and some other skin of uncertain translation. Examining the uses of these materials throughout scripture yields an interesting, albeit tenuous, pattern.

Goats hair
Goats are used for sin and burnt offerings. Jacob and Rebecca used a goat to deceive Isaac into giving Esau’s blessing to Jacob. When David’s life was threatened by Saul, his wife (and Saul’s daughter) Michal made a mock-up of his body, with a goat-hair pillow as his head, to deceive Saul’s assassins. Alexander the Great was portrayed in Daniel’s prophecy as a goat. Finally, goats were cooked as gifts for angels and for King Saul.

Red rams skins
The word for “red” in red ram skins is the same word as Adam. It is used to describe the first man, mankind as a whole, and a common man as opposed to a man of the aristocracy. It is the color of earthiness and mortality. The word for ram is elsewhere used for posts, the upright branches of a tree, the lintel of a doorway, a mighty man, and a great oak. The juxtaposition of one word that can refer to a “commoner” and another word that can refer to a “mighty man” is curious.

Badger skin?
Badger is an uncertain translation at best. It could be the skin of manatees or of some other animal. Some commentators believe it refers to a blue ram skin, as opposed to the red ram skin in the previous layer of the tabernacle covering. Whatever this material is, it was also used to make shoes, as the first covering on the Ark and the second covering on the Table, the incense altar, the various articles for the tabernacle, and the altar for burnt offerings. It’s association with the feet implies something mean and humble, and it was probably the most weatherproof of the three layers.

The tenuous pattern that I see here is a dual progression of common to uncommon. From one perspective, looking from the outside in, you will pass through the meanest element, the badger skin. Although it was probably not from a badger, other guesses are usually also unclean animals such as the manatee. This material was used to make footwear, but not much else. The next layer is ram skin dyed red. Not shani (scarlet or crimson) used elsewhere in the Tabernacle, but adam, the same word used in Isaiah 31:8 and Psalm 49:2 to describe a commoner. Shani is paired, however, with ayil (ram), which more literally refers to strength. The ram skin almost seems like a compromise between peasant and ruler, a middle class so to speak. The third layer is woven goats hair, furthest removed of the three materials from its natural state. It is associated with misdirection, sin offerings (another form of misdirection in that they cover over a sinful state), and with gifts given to those of the highest rank. It was probably decorated in some way. As the three coverings move closer to God’s presence in the Holy of Holies, they each seem to represent a higher rank or authority.

Considered from the opposite perspective, however, one sees not a descending order of glory or power, but yet another progression from common to rare. Goats hair, for example, was readily obtainable. One need not kill the animal to get its wool, but only to shave it. Next is the ram skin. Although the ram must be killed to obtain its skin, it was a fairly common animal. Easy to find, but not so easy to use. The third level, however, was difficult to gather in sufficient quantities to make such a large covering. Whatever its source, it was so uncommon that the word itself is now of uncertain meaning. Even so, this does not indicate a gain in glory as one moves further from God’s presence. To the contrary, God did not so much dwell in the Tabernacle as use it as a focus. It allowed him to dwell among his people, but it seems absurd to believe that God could be so small as to confine his person to a tent. The Ark of the Covenant is a symbol of his throne and not the thing itself. God’s actual throne, if it can be defined as an actual object, is in heaven and not on earth at all, so that the progression from goats skin to badger skin moves from common to rare materials as it approaches God’s actual throne.

The progression inward toward the Holy of Holies might correlate with authority and position, while the progression outward toward God’s true abode in heaven might correlate with more inherent qualities of character.

Please note that I am not prophesying. I am speculating. It is an interesting exercise, but whether there are deeper truths to be gained from it is only another speculation. Feel free to do with this what you will.

Update 2010-03-09. Significant edits.