<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Dangers of First Mention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historycarper.com/wordpress/2005/the-dangers-of-first-mention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historycarper.com/wordpress/2005/the-dangers-of-first-mention/</link>
	<description>Jay&#039;s thoughts on stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 04:59:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay c</title>
		<link>http://www.historycarper.com/wordpress/2005/the-dangers-of-first-mention/comment-page-1/#comment-10743</link>
		<dc:creator>jay c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 04:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historycarper.com/wordpress/?p=22#comment-10743</guid>
		<description>That would be interesting. It&#039;s a fitting name: loveliness or pleasantness. Any woman who could stick with Noah for hundreds of years while her social status plummeted into the red and then allow herself to be locked into a great ship full of all kinds of animals is a woman of truly beautiful character.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be interesting. It&#8217;s a fitting name: loveliness or pleasantness. Any woman who could stick with Noah for hundreds of years while her social status plummeted into the red and then allow herself to be locked into a great ship full of all kinds of animals is a woman of truly beautiful character.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh McBryde</title>
		<link>http://www.historycarper.com/wordpress/2005/the-dangers-of-first-mention/comment-page-1/#comment-10742</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh McBryde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 04:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historycarper.com/wordpress/?p=22#comment-10742</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s my conclusion that the reason Lamech&#039;s family is mentioned, is that Naamah is probably Mrs. Noah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s my conclusion that the reason Lamech&#8217;s family is mentioned, is that Naamah is probably Mrs. Noah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Aardvark</title>
		<link>http://www.historycarper.com/wordpress/2005/the-dangers-of-first-mention/comment-page-1/#comment-10741</link>
		<dc:creator>The Aardvark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historycarper.com/wordpress/?p=22#comment-10741</guid>
		<description>Heh. Another fave is the &quot;double reference&quot; concept used to convert prophetic presuppositions into Doctrine.
Yes  I came all the way back here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh. Another fave is the &#8220;double reference&#8221; concept used to convert prophetic presuppositions into Doctrine.<br />
Yes  I came all the way back here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay&#8217;s Thoughts on Stuff &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Lamech&#8217;s Two Wives</title>
		<link>http://www.historycarper.com/wordpress/2005/the-dangers-of-first-mention/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay&#8217;s Thoughts on Stuff &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Lamech&#8217;s Two Wives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 20:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historycarper.com/wordpress/?p=22#comment-120</guid>
		<description>[...] As a descendant of Cain and a probably murderer, Lamech is often used to demonstrate how God does not approve of polygamy. &#8220;See? The first recorded polygamist was also a murderer and of the line of Cain. It must be wrong!&#8221; Too great a dependence on the Law of First Mention is a theological land mine all on its own, but apart from that, they are ignoring some important details in the story. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As a descendant of Cain and a probably murderer, Lamech is often used to demonstrate how God does not approve of polygamy. &#8220;See? The first recorded polygamist was also a murderer and of the line of Cain. It must be wrong!&#8221; Too great a dependence on the Law of First Mention is a theological land mine all on its own, but apart from that, they are ignoring some important details in the story. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

