Archive for June, 2006

FLDS Hostile to Strangers?

Tuesday, June 27th, 2006

My husband paid his first visit to Colorado City, home of the FLDS, on Saturday….As he filled his truck with gas, none of the people who’d stopped to fill their vehicles would meet his glance. Inside the store, he held a door open for two young women. They didn’t look at him or offer a word of thanks.

He was hungry, so he checked the shelves for a snack. At the counter, he tried to make small talk with an older woman working the cash register.

Silence.

“The feeling I got is I don’t exist,” he told me later. “I am not a human. I’d rather they call me names. At least they’d be acknowledging I am alive.”

He couldn’t get over it. “That is the weirdest thing I’ve ever seen. It’s like the Twilight Zone. I can’t believe people will be like that. Poor souls.” -Brooke Adams, “Fearing the different

One of the defining characteristics of a godless people is hostility toward outsiders. It was one of Sodom’s main sins. Strangers are one of God’s three protected classes: widows, orphans, and strangers. I don’t know anything about Hilldale or Colorado City. I’ve never been there, and I’ve never met anyone from there. I can’t vouch for the accuracy of Adams’ comments (although she seems fair from what I’ve read). However if that attitude is standard among the FLDS group, she is right that it is unquestionably “un-Christ like behavior.”

Adult != Pacifist

Tuesday, June 27th, 2006

The WordNet definition for “pacifist” includes “adult” in the See Also section. (See http://hyperdictionary.com/dictionary/pacifist and http://www.hyperdic.net/dic/pacifist.htm.) That connection is obviously misplaced and is even a little absurd. The ubiquitous state of war around the world was created solely by adults without consulting a single child. It seems that whoever submitted that connection deliberately compromised the accuracy of the WordNet dictionary for the sake of making an ignorant political statement.

06/28/2006 Update:

Guido Demoor, a father of two, intervened when six [Muslim] “youths” got on bus 23 in Antwerp and began to intimidate passengers. There were some forty people on the bus. Demoor asked the “youths” to calm down, whereupon they turned on him, savagely beating and kicking the man. At the next stop thirty passengers fled the bus. The thugs kept beating Demoor. They then pulled the emergency brake and jumped from the bus leaving their victim to die. -The Brussels Journal

There was only one adult on that bus, and he was murdered by 40 pacifists.

“Thus saith the LORD, Keep ye judgment, and do justice: for my salvation is near to come, and my righteousness to be revealed.”

“How long will ye judge unjustly, and accept the persons of the wicked? …Arise, O God, judge the earth: for thou shalt inherit all nations.”

http://voxday.blogspot.com/2006/06/those-cowardly-belgians.html

Pride in Achievement

Monday, June 26th, 2006

I took my son out bike riding yesterday. It has been really hard getting him to learn to ride. He just doesn’t have any desire. I know he’ll love it once he gets better at it, but until then all he wants to do is watch television and play video games. He complained and moaned about it and did the usual number of feigning fatigue and imbalance, and then he said he forgot how to ride, but eventually he got on the bike and started pedaling. He fell once and scraped the inside of his leg on the pedal, and wanted to use that as an excuse to quit. I still wouldn’t let him, though, and I think he finally realized that I wasn’t going to back down. He got on the bike again, and this time he managed to stay on. After fifty yards or so, his body seemed to remember what it was supposed to do, and he started picking up speed. He didn’t fall again (I ran alongside him almost the whole way just to make sure), and he rode for close to a mile before I let him quit for the day. I felt like a real bully for making him ride, and especially after the one spill. For a minute, I wondered if I was pushing too hard, if he might learn to hate bike riding because of me. But when he really got going, and he was riding on his own, the look on his face told me everything I needed to know. The pain in his leg, the video game he left off, and the cartoons he could be watching were all forgotten in favor of the wind on his face, the pavement racing past his feet, and the sheer exhilaration of accomplishment.

Update: I hadn’t thought about this before, but it would have saved me a huge amount of trouble: Remove the pedals and let him coast around to learn balance. Hat tip to Marlene the Home Maker at http://oikourgos.blogspot.com/2006/05/teaching-your-child-to-ride-bike.html.

Hypocrites

Sunday, June 25th, 2006

Some people are so caught up in their own self-righteousness. They wink at homosexuality, witchcraft, and idolatry (all capital offenses in God’s law); turn a blind eye to lying, godless politicians; and despise the destitute, widows, and fatherless. They preach openness and tollerance all day long, but don’t you dare disagree with them about any of their sacred moral cows! They are religionists who will tell a destitute single mother to take a hike so they can recarpet the sanctuary. They think it’s cute to dress a little girl like a prostitute, but revile a man who tells his wife to wear a head-covering to church. They’ll accept a woman who moves from man to man like a prostitute paid in alimony and diamond rings, but they’ll hate a man who remains faithful to two wives simultaneously. Hypocrites. Pit-bulls bred and trained to do violence to God’s laws and God’s Name.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Discrimination Against Caucasian Men

Friday, June 23rd, 2006

Interesting article in June 19th’s ComputerWorld: “100 Best Places to Work in IT 2006″. Here are some of the statistics cited as justifications for three of their top five picks:

-#2 University of Miami: “74% of IT staffers are minorities.”
-#3 Capital Group: “52% of the IT staffers are minorities.”
-#5 Grant Thornton LLP: “43% of its IT managers are women. 29% of IT staffers are women.”

I don’t have anything against minorities or women. I think that if one person is more qualified to do a job, then that person should get the job. It doesn’t matter to me if the person is a black woman from Atlanta or a hermaphrodite from Sacramento. If he/she/it can do the job, then great! The problem is when people start discriminating against one group in order to make up for a perceived injustice to another group.

Do minorities really make up 74% of the IT professionals in the Miami area? Or 52% in all of the Capital Group locations? I’m having trouble believing that. I think you’d have to work hard to hire that many minorities in technical fields–or you have to hire them all from India–because most IT people in the United States are white men. Even in Miami.

I work in an IT department with eight men and one woman. This department isn’t unique. I’ve been in IT departments with ratios of 12 to 0 and 15 to 1. These companies weren’t discriminating against women. It’s just that there aren’t many women interested in these jobs, and many of those who do apply aren’t qualified. Grant Thornton must be discriminating against men from the very beginning by giving a preference to women regardless of technical ability. If the numbers of men and women who apply for positions at Grant Thornton are roughly the same as at other companies, then men competing against women for the same jobs are at greater than a 50% handicap just because they are men. They continue to discriminate against men who seek promotion. If you are competing against a woman for a management promotion, your chances of getting the promotion drop by one-third solely because of your gender.

The article should have been called “100 Best Places for Minorities and Women to Work in IT,” because they don’t look so great for white men.

Update 07/10/2006: Read-worthy post at http://lndavout.blogspot.com/2006/07/response-to-lee.html .

Happy Fathers Day. You’re worthless.

Sunday, June 18th, 2006

I just watched Animal Planets’ Most Extreme: Dads. By the end of the show, I was really feeling how great it is to be a man. Maybe their list of top ten animal dads will explain why:

10. Lion – Defends his children.
9. Antechinus Mouse – Mates nonstop.
8. Golden Jackal – Gives his food to his children.
7. Giant waterbug – Cares for the eggs.
6. Rhea – Cares for the eggs.
5. Stickleback Fish – Cares for the eggs.
4. Jacana Bird – Polyandrous and lets female kill his young.
3. Bull Frog – Cares for the young.
2. Penguin – Makes milk for the young.
1. Seahorse – Gestates and gives birth to young.

Number 10 is a pretty good pick. The lion is strong and fierce. He’s number ten because he defends his family and territory from predators and intruders. So far so good.

Number 9 is OK. Hyper-potency is something to be proud of. I guess. It’s not bad at least. Well, sometimes anyway.

Number 8 is pretty respectable. You have to respect a man who sacrifices for his children. We’re not doing too badly yet.

Number 7 is…well, he’s mom. He made the list because he does things that women traditionally do in a human household. Same with number 6 and 5 and 4. They all hang around the nest and care for the eggs. If that wasn’t bad enough, the Jacana lets any old female come along and kill all his eggs before laying some more in his nest. He has no way of knowing whether this batch shares his genes or not. He’s a polyandrous sex slave. And these traits make them great dads how? I suppose they’re great dads for being bugs, birds, and fish, but Fathers Day is about human fathers, isn’t it?

Number 3 is another homemaker, only he sticks around to care for the tadpoles, too. Yeah! Another Mr. Mom!

Number 2 not only cares for the young, but he makes a milk-like substance for them too. Swap to a human Dad breast-feeding his baby. Isn’t that sweet? Are you sick, yet?

Number 1 has an internal pouch into which the female lays her eggs. They gestate inside of him, they hatch, and he gives birth. Animal Planet says he is number one because he is both mother and father.

Now, dads, don’t you feel special? Now you know that defending your children and sacrificing for them is the least of your good traits. Emasculating yourself and doing everything you can to turn yourself into a woman is your only hope of really measuring up. Fathers are worthless except when they are able to emulate mothers.

The Legend of Zorro–an alternate history

Saturday, June 17th, 2006

The Legend of Zorro was an entertaining movie with some fun fight scenes, but there were definitely some strange things going on:

>The Confederacy existed in 1850.

>Cowboys and illiterate hoodlums carried sabres.

>An ultra-secret order of knights established during the crusades ruled the world until the United States and Allan Pinkerton came to the rescue.

These people have been watching too much History Channel.

The drinking, smoking, visual-wise-cracking horse stole the show.

2006-06-19 Update: I appreciated the pro-father elements in Zorro 2, although it occurs to me now that the makers might have intended to convey a different message than the one I heard. Life’s responsibilities are sometimes much bigger than today. Feelings and ideals about “quality time” and nurturing sometimes have to take a back seat to duty.

Polygamy is more attractive to women than to men.

Thursday, June 15th, 2006

On June 6th, Martin (of polygamynow.blogspot.com) wrote,

Polygamy is more attractive to women than to men. Why? I don’t know. Fear of commitment? Fear of performing sexually on a schedule? Limited income? If a man’s goal isn’t to father a lot of children, I doubt if many men would consider polygamy.” (Emphasis added.)

That’s certainly the first time I recall hearing that particular claim. I’ve heard other people say that women should be more attracted to polygamy than men are, but never that they actually are. Polygamy–polygyny, actually–holds more benefits for good women than it holds for good men, but the arguments are usually pragmatic, dispassionate ones that don’t hold a lot of water for most women. For them, female companionship, extra child-care, division of labor, etc., don’t usually out-weigh more ethereal (and unrealistic) ideals of romance and monogamous devotion.

For men, the responsibilities of massively more complex relationships, community, extended-family PR, and legal repercussions seem almost overwhelming, but are very nearly balanced by the benefits of more children, companionship, and help.

Technorati Tags: polygyny, monogamy, patriarchy, marriage, roles, feminism, relationships

Yankee Test

Thursday, June 15th, 2006

There’s a test at
http://www.alphadictionary.com/articles/yankeetest.html to determine
if you’re a Yankee or a Rebel. I scored “49% Dixie. Barely in
Yankeedom.” That comes from growing up a conservative in heavily
liberal Illinois and then spending four good (if dirt poor) years in
Texas.

Triply Redundant

Tuesday, June 13th, 2006

I watched half of Exit Wounds last night. I forgot that I had already
seen it a few years ago. I wonder why.

Let’s see….Steven Segal, predictable, formulaic. Hmmm. Is there a
word for a triple redundancy? “Forgettable” maybe?