Archive for August, 2006

God’s Law of Righteousness

Sunday, August 20th, 2006

Peter, addressing Jews exiled outside of Israel, wrote,

1 Peter 1:8-9 Believing in Yeshua the Messiah, though you cannot see him, you have a joy unspeakable and glorious, receiving the end of your faith, which is the salvation of your souls.

When you receive salvation, your faith does not end. Salvation is not the termination of faith, but its goal. Your faith will not only continue, but it will grow with time.

Romans 10:3-4 The [Jews], being ignorant of God’s righteousness and attempting to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves to the righteousness of God. For the Messiah is the end of the law of righteousness for everyone who believes.

He went on to quote the Torah, calling it “the law for [or 'of'] righteousness” and “the righteousness of faith.” He wrote that obedience to the law that Moses wrote down allows a man to live.

If Peter did not mean that salvation is the termination of faith, how then can we say that Paul meant that the Messiah is the termination of the law? Obedience to God’s laws of righteousness does not bring death, but rather obedience to man’s laws of righteousness does. God’s laws bring life. Both Peter and Paul warned against the man-made traditions and oral Torah of the Jews in favor of the written Torah of Moses.
Peter continued his letter in much the same vein:

Don’t attempt to establish your own righteousness according to your own desires in your ignorance [that is, the oral Torah], but according to the Holy One who has called you, you also become holy in all conduct, because it is written [in the written Torah], “Be holy, for I am holy.”

If you understand that the Messiah is our salvation, and you see that Paul referred to the written Torah as “the righteousness of faith,” then there is no confusion. Salvation brought by the Messiah is the goal of the righteousness of faith, and our faith will increase as we continue in obedience to that righteousness.

(All scripture is paraphrased from the Modern King James Version.)

Update, September 28, 2007: I’ve heard some say that the Greek word Paul used for “end” in Romans 10:4 could not be used to mean “aim” or “goal.” They’ll have to take that up with Paul, who also wrote, “The end of the commandment is love out of a pure heart, and a good conscience, and faith unfeigned…”

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Public Schools, Public Disgrace

Thursday, August 17th, 2006

A public school teacher has confessed to the murder of JonBenet Ramsey.

It seems that every day brings another story of a public school teacher mollesting her (sometimes his) students. And these people are supposed to be better teachers than parents?

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

The Power of True Love

Monday, August 14th, 2006

In a previous post I contrasted three kinds of love, only one of which was worth anything to anyone. In this post, I will contrast two more kinds of love: being in love and loving someone.

I was singing along with Huey Lewis on the radio recently (suitably mumbling inappropriate lines, of course), when my eleven year old son piped up, “Believe what about love?”

Believe what, indeed? I had to think about that for a minute, before I finally answered, “I don’t know. I don’t think the singer knows either.” He kept singing, “Do you believe in love?” But never really specified what we’re supposed to believe about love. I started thinking about Lewis’ other songs and realized that he really might not know what he’s supposed to believe. He might not have a clue what love is, let alone what it can do. Here are the lyrics to another of his songs:

The Power of Love

by Huey Lewis and the News

The power of love
Is a curious thing.
Make one man weep.
Make another man sing.
Change your heart
To a little white dove.
More than a feeling.
That’s the power of love.

Tougher than diamonds
Rich like cream.
Stronger and harder
Than a bad girl’s dream.
Make a bad one good.
Make a wrong one right.
The power of love will
Keep you home at night.

You don’t need money,
It don’t take fame,
You don’t need no credit card
To ride this train.
It’s strong and it’s sudden
And it’s cruel sometimes,
But it might just save your life.
That’s the power of love.
That’s the power of love.

The first time you feel it
It might make you sad.
Next time you feel it
It might make you mad.
You’ll be glad baby
when you found
That’s the power of love.
It makes the world go round.

It don’t take money
It don’t take fame.
Don’t need no credit card
To ride this train.
It’s strong and it’s sudden,
And it’s cruel sometimes.
But it might just save your life.

They say that only love is fair
Yeah, but you don’t care.
But you’ll know what to do
When it gets hold of you,
And with a little help from above
You’ll feel the power of love.
You’ll feel the power of love.

Can you feel it?

Don’t take money.
Don’t take fame.
Don’t need no credit card
To ride this train.

Tougher than diamonds,
Stronger than steel.
You won’t feel nothing
‘Til you feel
Feel the power of love
Just feel the power of love.

That’s the power of love.
You feel the power of love
You feel the power of love
You feel the power of love

He says that love is powerful and strong and sudden, that you can’t buy it, and you can’t get it by being famous. You just feel it.

But feel what?

Well, the power, of course.

Oh, right. Of course.

Talk to the bones of Troy about the power of that kind of love.

In pop culture, love is only important because of how it makes you feel. “Being in love” means that you get warm fuzzy feelings. The whole aim of existence is to feel the power of love.

What a rotten, parasitic way to live.

Compare Lewis’ emoting to this song from the Seventy Sevens:

This Is the Way Love Is
by The Seventy Sevens

When I gave up,
You held up.
When I ran out,
You filled me up.
When I kept runnin’,
You kept up.
When I let you down,
You lifted me up.
This is the way love is.

When I couldn’t find the words,
You understood.
When I didn’t find the time,
You were in no hurry.
When I wouldn’t make ends meet,
You tacked them together.
When I cheated,
You kept to the rules.

This is the way love is.
This is the way love is.
Well, it’s a one-sided, double-minded
Mirror with no reflection.

When I was keepin’ it in,
You were givin’ out.
When I was losin’ out,
You’d let me come back.
When I was holdin’ back,
You were holdin’ on.
When I was losin’ my cool,
You were keepin’ your love warm.

This is the way love is.
This is the way love is.
Well, it’s a one-sided, double-minded
Mirror with no reflection.
2x

I kept it all to myself
Just like a miser
Holds onto his last dime.
When I closed up myself
Like a deperate man on a life line,
Well, I was bled dry
Wrapped up in my pride.

This is the way it is
When you’re on the wrong side.

This is the way love is.
This is the way love is.
Well, it’s a one-sided, double-minded
Mirror with no reflection.
3x

This is the way love is.
4x

In this vision, love is all about giving without getting, supporting without being supported. It’s about Yeshua and Mother Theresa and the woman who spends her free time at the nursing home and the man who spends every weekend ministering at the state prison.

Like I wrote before, there’s nothing wrong with being in love, with all the intensity of emotion that comes with infatuation. It’s great! I love it! But it’s not enough to make true love.

True love takes selflessness. I wish I had more of that kind of love to give.

The Seventy Sevens sing about the so-called “Power of Love” too: “I kept it all to myself just like a miser holds on to his last dime. When I closed up myself like a desperate man on a lifeline, well, I was bled dry, wrapped up in my pride.”

That’s the way it is when you’re on the wrong side, when you’re asking, “What can love do for me?”

Active Directory Group Nesting

Thursday, August 10th, 2006

Group membership and nesting in Windows 2000 and 2003 Active Directory domains used to confuse the heck out of me. I still have to keep a reference chart around to figure it out sometimes. For example, if a Global Group is so global, why can’t I add global users to it? Why does it only accept local users?

My biggest problem was that I was thinking of groups in terms of members, when I should have been thinking in terms of resources. A global group is global because it can access global resources, not because it contains global users. It is the global face of local users. Likewise, a Domain Local Group can access local resources. It’s the local face of global users. See diagram 1 for a graphical representation of what kinds of groups can be nested in other groups.

In order to simplify administration of resources, you should use Global Groups to represent groups of users and Domain Local Groups to represent resources. Look at diagram 2 to see what I mean.

For groups of users who need to access resources across multiple domains in a more complex Active Directory Forest, you might want to substitute Universal Groups for Global Groups.

Diagram 1: Group Nesting
Diagram 1: Group Nesting

Diagram 2: Users to Global Groups to Domain Local Groups to Resources
Diagram 2: Users to Resources

Please leave me a note letting me know if this article was helpful. Username: Guest. Password: Guest.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Real Love

Wednesday, August 9th, 2006

Love is like a manager with three employees. The manager told the employees of a new company program that would bring more paperwork and more hassle of all kinds. The first employee said, “You know that this program won’t accomplish its stated goals. It will only hurt productivity, and I refuse to be part of a program that will only cost you your job.” Then he returned to his office and pushed all of the new paperwork into his garbage can. The second employee said, “This is such a great idea! I’ve been looking for an opportunity just like it. You can count on me.” Then he returned to his office, stacked the new paperwork on the corner of his desk, and put it out of his mind. The third employee said, “This is such a load of crap! My job was hard enough already, and now you pile this on me too? I can’t do this.” Then he returned to his office and began working on the new paperwork.

Each of these men displayed an element of love. The first man showed some concern for his superior, and that’s admirable. Unfortunately, he didn’t really do anything helpful. In fact, his defiance cost the team the benefit of his knowledge and labor. Lost time and delayed projects probably made the manager look even worse. The second man showed a great attitude. He felt good about his manager and made his manager feel good too. At least for a little while. At least the first employee performed according to expectations. The second employee added lying to insubordination. The third employee didn’t make anyone feel good. He complained and acted as if he wouldn’t contribute to the new program at all. However, he was the only one of the three who actually attempted to do the work. At the end of the week, the third employee was the only one who kept his job. He was the only one who showed any meaningful love for his manager.

Good feelings and good words are great. Everyone loves to be in love, to feel warm and fuzzy and glowing. Those things are important, and all of the best marriages will have them. However, being “in love” is such a minor thing in the whole of real love. All the good feelings in the world don’t help anyone except the one who has them. The object of your affections can’t feel your affection. It won’t keep them warm at night or dress their wounds, or encourage them when they’re down. Love, to mean anything at all, must be expressed. Not just in words, because words, though still important, aren’t much better than feelings. Love must be expressed through action. I can have all the affection in the world for you, but if I don’t do anything for you, what good is it? Being in love without doing the things that love entails is the ultimate expression of selfishness. It denies the object of your affection any benefits, hogging them all to yourself.

The most important part of love is what you do, not how you feel or what you say.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

McBrows

Friday, August 4th, 2006

Here’s a little beauty tip for the ladies: Natural is almost always better.

One of the most god-awful things a woman can do to her face is to pluck out her entire eyebrow and draw in a new one, especially when she draws it in so unnaturally that it looks more like McDonald’s arches than eyebrows. Shape it a bit if you want to, but don’t get carried away.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

The Role of the Poor

Friday, August 4th, 2006

When Yeshua said we will always have the poor with us, he wasn’t necessarily being fatalistic. He wasn’t commenting on greed or hopelessness. He was saying two things (that I can think of off the top of my head):

First, the poor–or rather, the less fortunate, because there is an extreme parsity of real poverty in America–will always be with us, because that’s the way God wants it. Giving to the poor is a command and carries physical and spiritual benefits for the giver. God wants us to have an opportunity to experience those benefits, so he arranges for some people to have more than others. The “War on Poverty” and mass charities are misguided and counter to the way God wants charity to work. They actually create more poverty due to economic processes, which were probably designed by God in part to ensure that there would always be an upper and a lower economic class.

That doesn’t necessarily mean that some people are destined to be poor while others destined to be wealthy, nor that we should never help the poor so much that they aren’t poor anymore. I’m not talking about divine right and I’m not preaching Hinduism. It just means that we shouldn’t worry too much about it. Don’t try to save the world. Help those you can help personally, and let God take care of the rest.

Which leads me to the second point I believe Yeshua was making: keep your priorities straight. If everyone spent all their time helping the poor, then we would all very quickly become the poor. Everyone has their mission, their ministry, and it might change from time to time. You have to keep your eyes open, spiritual and physical, and realize that, no matter how emotionally charged a problem might be, there could be more important things for you to worry about. If every pilot or tanker ditched in order to pull a wounded soldier off the field, the war would soon be lost.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

Deleted Comments

Thursday, August 3rd, 2006

I cleaned out some comments that appeared to be spam. If one of them was yours, re-post it, and I’ll leave it alone.

Mexican Standoff in Lebanon

Thursday, August 3rd, 2006

Hezbollah says they won’t agree to a cease fire until Israel pulls out of Lebanon. Israel says they won’t pull out of Lebanon or agree to a cease fire until the UN sends more peacekeeping troops. The UN says they won’t send peacekeepers until Israel agrees to a cease fire.

Huh. OK. Let’s see….

The Israeli government is as full of politicians as any other government. They can’t seem to figure out which end is the front and which is the back lately. Since they’re politicians, that might actually be a good thing. Competent (but not necessarily sane or honest) politicians are about the scariest and deadliest things on the planet.

There’s no question about trusting Hezbollah to keep their word. You’d have to be completely insane (or an incurable democrat, which might be the same thing) to think they would really stop shooting at Jews as long as a single Jew still breathes.

And the UN? Ha! Ha! LOL! Hoo! ROFLOL! Oh, man! Stop it!

Let me catch my breath…

I think what the situation really needs is a Josiah to clean house inside of Israel and a Gideon to clean everyone else’s house. No more games, no more PR campaigns, only justice.

Will that bring a lasting peace? Not unless that Josiah and Gideon come in the singular person of the returning Messiah Yeshua. Even so, come Adonai Yeshua.

 

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,