Archive for October, 2006

No One Knows

Tuesday, October 31st, 2006

No one knows the troubles I’ve seen. I believe that’s the essense of what Solomon meant by Proverbs 14:10.

The heart knoweth its own bitterness; and a stranger doth not intermeddle with its joy.

Everyone has his own emotional and spiritual pain thresholds. One person endures the loss of his job, his family, and his health, and carries on. Another person loses an illusion and collapses into substance abuse and cycles of self destruction. We can see who is stronger, but who is to say who suffers the most? Only God can really see the heart; only He knows the real depth and cause of our wounds. Thankfully, He also knows what will bring us the greatest joy. No one else does.

In the Interest of Sensitivity

Monday, October 30th, 2006

Over the last twenty years there have been a lot of pushes for name changes in the interest of sensitivity to Native Americans, even when the Native Americans in question hadn’t even realized that they ought to be feeling sensitive. There’s the Redskins, the Seminoles, the Chiefs, etc. If we’re really concerned with doing the right thing here, we can’t stop with sports teams. Naming a team after an Indian tribe or archetype is supposed to be something of a complement. (Why won’t anyone stand up for all those poor North Carolina Renos and Dumonts suffering under the oppression of Duke University and their Blue Devils!?)What about all those names that were derived from such mundane considerations as proximity? What about those horribly insensitive names derived from the conquest of one tribe or another by Europeans? A few names I think we should seriously consider changing:

  • Alabama
  • Mississippi
  • Missouri
  • Illinois
  • Sioux City
  • Iowa
  • North and South Dakota
  • Utah
  • Saskatchewan
  • Minnesota
  • Indiana (!!!)
  • Cheyenne

There are countless more! Think of all those poor people whose names were taken and mutilated so callously. What about the descendants of the Cherokee? How can they go on living, knowing there’s a Cherokee, Alabama, just mocking them from their former homeland?

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Palestine and Palestinians

Sunday, October 29th, 2006

Someone recently asked, “If ‘Palestine’ is such an ancient country why is it not mentioned in ancient history?”

Actually it is. The same word is found all through the Old Testament, so obviously it was mentioned in the histories of at least one ancient people. Palestine is an English corruption of a Latin corruption of Pilishti, which we more commonly know from the Bible as Philistine.

That kind of corruption happens with words all the time. Think of Jesus, which came from Iesus, which came from Yeshua. Or Jay, which came from Jayco, which came from Iago, which came from Yaakov.

The Philistines (not the Palestinians) would have a prior claim to part of the land of Israel, if it weren’t for that inconvenient thing about God taking the land away from the Philistines and Canaanites and giving it to the Israelites. The modern Palestinians are just Arabs who happen to live within a political boundary once bearing that name, and are not actually related to the ancient Philistines at all. There doesn’t appear to be an actual ethnic group of people that anyone can accurately call “Palestinians.” It’s a little like claiming to be of the Pennsylvanian race. There are Pennsylvanians, but they’re only called that because they live in Pennsylvania, not because they’re really a distinctive race of people

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Pride, Fear, and Polygamophobia

Friday, October 27th, 2006

Eloquent as ever, Mizazeez wrote, “i suppose my struggle has never been with polygyny in general. i suppose my struggle was more personal. my husband taking another wife triggered pre-existing insecurities and animosity that would have surfaced at some other time due to some other circumstance had my husband not had polygynous endeavors.”

That is true in almost everything. Our problems are almost always of our own making. Our attitudes–our baggage–are behind almost every human conflict. God created men and women to be married in a particular relationship to one another, and it is not a relationship of equal partners. In Genesis 3:16 God told women (via Eve) that they will be in an eternal struggle against their pride and drive to rule their husbands. That is the true patriarchal curse of Eve, not that she would be ruled by her husband, but that she and all of her descendants would each have to battle and defeat their own Jezebel in order to be content in life as God meant it to be lived. This desire is like (perhaps more than “like”) a living creature, and it must be fought as such.

Our culture’s monogamous, polygamophobic dogma relieves wives of a large part of this battle. It tells them that it is OK to surrender to Jezebel in this one area. “It’s OK to rule your husband in this way,” it says, “because you’re equal.” Never mind the inherent contradiction of ruling an equal, and never mind that this one surrender gives the enemy a beachhead by which he can conquer the whole woman. Likewise, it tells men that they are perverts or domineering control freaks if they ever feel the slightest desire for another woman or if they entertain even a thought that the other woman might be a good addition to his family. Wives build a fortress of pride and indignation around this little kingdom and hold it over their husbands’ heads, constantly threatening and manipulating.

There are three evidences that this jealously guarded fortress is actually territory surrendered to fear.

First, godly women are to follow the examples of the Hebrew matriarchs, Sarah, Rebekah, Leah, and Rachel, in their relationships with their husbands. Three of those four women insisted on sharing their husbands with other women. While they were still motivated by fear or jealousy, those motivations led them to surrender more control to their husbands.

Second, most women would sooner tolerate multiple, temporary, and adulterous affairs than share their husband with a second wife. Not only does promiscuity put her husband’s soul at risk, but it puts both of them at risk of disease. Despite recent propaganda to the contrary, polygyny is no more conducive to the spread of disease than is monogamy. Women will tolerate sin and death before considering true submission.

Third, wives who are otherwise submissive and honorable are likely to enter an immediate rage at the prospect of a second wife. They will give in to the urge to hate, lie, and abuse, but will not give in to their husbands.

These are not characteristics of righteousness and love, but of fear and pride. They are only and thoroughly evil.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Check out A Commentary on Marriage in the Bible!

The Blind Leading Themselves

Thursday, October 26th, 2006

Scientists Find Lamprey A ‘Living Fossil’: 360 Million-year-old Fish Hasn’t Evolved Much

Scientists from the University of Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa, and the University of Chicago have uncovered a remarkably well-preserved fossil lamprey from the Devonian period that reveals today’s lampreys as “living fossils” since they have remained largely unaltered for 360 million years.

DNA, red blood cells in T-Rex bones, dozens of “living fossils”, dozens of other low-age indicators…If scientists didn’t already know better, you’d almost think that those fossils couldn’t possibly be 360 million years old. Don’t anyone open your eyes, now! I wouldn’t want you to have to face the fact that your entire life’s work has been a complete waste of time.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

A Perfect Day for Hunting Space Rocks

Wednesday, October 25th, 2006

And speaking of Plan Nine from Outer Space, I watched The Lost Skeleton of Cadavra tonight. It’s a spoof on the campy sci-fi flicks of the forties, fifties, and sixties. There was the three-eyed fish mutant in love with the pretty girl, the skeleton in love with the dingy she-alien, the stupid PhD’d scientist who wasn’t in love with the forest animals he transmographied into a weekend date (who did a mighty fine rock dance, I must admit), the brainy-but-worldly-wise scientist, and the philosophically challenged he-alien. It was hypnotically dull one moment and riotiously funny the next. I don’t know that I would ever buy the dvd, but it was worth the rental fee.

If you like scenery.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Common Searches

Wednesday, October 25th, 2006

The two most common searches that land people at this blog:

1. Styrofoam in the Microwave

2. Active Directory Group Nesting

Now if only I could find a way to combine those two topics….

Girls Will Be Girls

Monday, October 23rd, 2006

In honor of the Glasgow city councilthings, I have searched through all of the articles in my blog and altered as many gender-neutral terms as possible into the appropriate androcentricisms.

Don’t thank me, love. Just doing my part.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Your Own Worst Enemy

Friday, October 20th, 2006

The things that you do to yourself are much worse than what anyone has ever done to you.

Your hate, your anger, your bitterness–none of that can hurt anyone but you. The abuse that you do to yourself you blame on what someone else did to you a long time ago, but it’s only been you since then. The longer you hang onto it, the more damage you will do to yourself and, through you, to those you love.

Girlz Az Boyz

Friday, October 20th, 2006

You know what’s worse than McBrows?

 OK, well, maybe nothing.

But you know what’s about as bad as McBrows? Girls dressing like boys. I don’t just mean tom boys or unfeminine girls. I mean girls who deliberately dress to look like boys. I know of a young woman who always wears a ball cap turned to the side, over-sized pants pulled half-way down to her knees, and an over-sized shirt (or three) usually untucked. She has a pretty face and a nice figure, too.

That is about as tasteless as it gets.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,