Archive for December, 2006

Messianic Christians and Jews

Friday, December 29th, 2006

Messianic believers are Christians–at least by the biblical definition–whether they like that label or not. Of course, the modern Western usage of the term “Christian” carries a lot of baggage that doesn’t apply to Messianics. I understand a certain amount of resistance to the term (I prefer “believer” myself.), but to flat out deny that a Messianic believer is a Christian is very nearly a denial of Christ.

  • Messianic Jews held the “Christian” title before any gentile did.
  • “Christian” means “little Christ,” which is what we are supposed to be. We are to live as the Messiah lived, therefore we are to be like little Messiahs.
  • Although many people think of Catholic Mass, televangelists, or religious tyranny when they hear the word “Christian,” so do many people think of pornography, lesbians, and feminazis when they hear the word “woman.” Does that mean women should disclaim that label in favor of “double-x person,” or “non-man?”

It all strikes me as a little silly and a lot of choking over gnats. If you don’t like the term, don’t use it, but don’t insist that Messianic believers in Yeshua are absolutely not Christians.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Rebuke a Wise Man and He Will Love You

Tuesday, December 26th, 2006

Correct a mocker and he will hate you; correct a wise man and he will love you. -King Solomon

One way to learn something of the character of a man is to correct him on some serious matter and observe his response. If he responds respectfully, considerately, then you have learned something good. If he responds angrily, resentfully, mockingly, then you have learned something not so good.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Two Books

Tuesday, December 26th, 2006

Co-Parenting After Divorce by Diana Schulman

Good book. Very easy to read and without a lot of psychobabble. Just very straightforward, point-by-point, practical information.

What Should I Tell the Kids? by Ava L. Siegler

Complete trash. Ms. Siegler, a columnist for Child magazine, takes Kinsey way too seriously. But then birds of a feather… She spent a substantial amount of time pushing the idea that parents should help their very young children masturbate. In the section on divorce, every single “real world” example (even the ones in which Mommy has another lover) assumed that dad was a loser and everything was really his fault. Of course, she didn’t say it like that, but she paints a pretty clear picture by the end of the chapter. I found her views on parent-child attachments and relationships so offensive that I could not continue to read it. If I had bought this book instead of borrowing it from the library, I would destroy it.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Power to Bind and Loose

Tuesday, December 26th, 2006

In the Torah, if one story follows another, you can be sure that there is a good reason. God is not random. The two stories are connected somehow. Matthew followed this same practice. There appear to be four separate teachings within Matthew 16:13-28, but they are all intimately connected.

Flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father who is in Heaven.

The source of all revelation is God. Through his Son and Spirit, he reveals himself to us. Yeshua reminded Peter that it is not through his own power or that of any other man that he was able to recognize the Son of God, but through the direct action of God.

Whatever you bind on Earth will be bound in Heaven, and whatever you loose on Earth will be loosed in Heaven.

All authority and power is delegated to man from God. We have power to command spirits to come and go, yet that power is not inherent in us. It has been given to us. It is the power of God’s Spirit moving through us. When we command a spirit here on Earth, it is God’s power from Heaven that binds it to do as it is told or releases it to do as it will.

You are an offense to me, for you are not thinking of the things of God, but the things of men.

The power that we have been given is subject to the will of God. We cannot command demons to attack God’s prophets, and we cannot command God’s prophecies to fail. Peter had power, but he was commanding what he wanted, in opposition to what he already knew God had ordained.

If anyone desires to come after me let him deny himself, and follow me.

In order to be a productive member of God’s kingdom, it is vital for a man to place God’s will above his own. Has God called you to abandon a lucrative career in favor of street ministry? Do you know that hard times will come before you can prepare for them? What of it? If you know God’s will, he has not given you authority to deny it. The authority and power of God is only given to us to further his kingdom, not to make our lives any easier.

God will hear you. Demons will obey you. Know God’s will first, and be sure of your motives.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Nanny-Future

Monday, December 25th, 2006

From J Storrs Hall’s Nanofuture:

Molecular synthesis will be able to make foods that are considerably closer to natural ones than current processed products. You can eat meats no animals were killed to obtain and crops no wildlife habitat was displaced to grow. No release of genetically modified organisms into the environment will be necessary to include as much of whatever vitamins and nutrients you need into whatever you like to eat. And the foods will be synthesized fresh just before being cooked or eaten, with no need even for a refrigerator. Indeed they could simply be synthesized cooked, with no need for a stove.

The dishes could be synthesized along with the food, and then simply dropped dirty into the recycler. Of course, with nanotechnology, you could mkae solid diamond plates that would come clean with the merest wave under the faucet, but the long-term trends are clear: manufactured items get cheaper, and space gets more exppensive (on Earth, anyway). So the typical domestic arrangements will tend toward making things when and where they are needed, and recycling rather than storage.

Some of my own predictions (not prophecies):

-Some people will still insist on eating naturally grown food. Real meat will probably be outlawed in California first. New York second.
-”Naturalism” will either become something of a popular religion or else people will become even more lazy and sedate than they are already. Why bother planning or saving when anything can be had at the moment you need it? The latter seems much more likely, but what use will the machines have for their eloi? Almost certainly not battery power.
-The distinguishing characteristic of the wealthy will no longer be the possession of more, bigger, or better-made stuff, (at least not so much as today) but more beautifully or more naturally made stuff. Food as an art form will no longer be the near-exclusive domain of expensive restaurants, but of digital artists and their patrons.
-Can you imagine the insanity of a fashion industry driven by the imagination and whim of the minute-to-minute consumer? You would be able to wear virtually anything that you could describe in sufficient detail.

What else can we look forward to as true nanotechnology becomes a reality over the next century?

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

About Christmas

Sunday, December 24th, 2006

Deuteronomy 12:29-32:

When the LORD your God shall cut off the nations before you, where you go to possess them, and you take their place and dwell in their land, take heed to yourself that you do not become snared by following them, after they are destroyed from before you, and that you do not ask about their gods, saying, How did these nations serve their gods, that I too may do likewise? You shall not do so to the LORD your God. For every abomination to the LORD, which He hates, they have done to their gods; even their sons and their daughters they have burned in the fire to their gods. All the things I command you, be careful to do it. You shall not add to it, nor take away from it.

(See also Deuteronomy 18:9-14.)

Regarding Christmas, there are good things and bad things, but the most important consideration for me is what pleases God. In Deuteronomy 12:29-32, God said not to learn how the former pagans used to worship their gods and then do the same for him. He told us how he is to be worshipped, and we are forbidden from adding to it or taking away from it. Christmas is to holidays as English is to languages. They are cultural borgs, assimilating everything they touch. Some Christmas traditions are clearly biblical, while others are clearly pagan, and some are more difficult to pin down. Google the words “pagan” and “Christmas,” and you are sure to find plethora of sites declaring everything about Christmas to be purely pagan and evil. You will also find sites claiming that everything about Christmas is purely inspired by God with not a speck of yellow to mar the pristine snowy landscape. Who’s right?

I am no expert on the subject. In fact, I haven’t even read a single book on it. I’ve read a lot of articles, listened to speeches, and sat in on debates, though. So, for whatever it’s worth, I’m going to give you my thoughts on it.

December 25th

From what I’ve read, December 25th was decided on as the birthdate of Yeshua relatively early on in Church history. Unfortunately, it was still decided at least a century after the fact, and it was decided by Greeks and Romans who wouldn’t necessarily understand all the nuances of the Jewish Gospel writers. Matthew, Mark, and John were all native Jews, and Luke was a proselyte at a fairly young age.

There are some people seriously believe that Yeshua was actually born on December 25th, but they are a minority. Most believe he was actually born on some other date, either in the late spring or early fall. Competing modern traditions point to the pagan holidays of Saturnalia and the many other winter solstice celebrations to explain how December 25th earned the title.

One tradition says that most of the cultures encompassed by the Roman Empire had some kind of winter solstice celebration, which generally fell very close to December 25th. That tradition is undoubtedly correct on that point, but it goes further. It says that Roman Christians didn’t want to appear to Jewish, so instead of celebrating a new holiday at a different time of year, they melded the new ideas into their existing celebrations. In that way, they would be celebrating Christmas at the same time everyone else was celebrating Saturnalia, and they wouldn’t stand out from the crowd. This sounds like a reasonable explanation, but as far as I can tell, it is only speculation. The solstice celebrations were certainly real, but I have never heard of any solid evidence that this was the motivation for selecting this date for Christmas.

A competing tradition says that the Roman Empire instituted the formal holiday of Saturnalia in order to compete with the growing popularity of the Christian holiday. I have at least heard of some documentary evidence that Saturnalia was not officially recognized by the Emperor until after Christians had already adopted the 25th for Christmas. Of course, that doesn’t mean that Saturnalia had not already been celebrated unofficially, so it doesn’t disprove the previous argument.

Another argument against December 25th is the fact of shepherds tending their flocks in the hills at night. I have heard it argued that no shepherd in Judea would have been tending flocks outdoors at night on December 25th. The shepherds supposedly drove their flocks into barns or warmer climes, I’m not sure which. The counter argument is that it rarely gets below freezing in that region even in December, and that shepherds routinely tend their flocks under those conditions. I have no way of knowing which is right. I know that in modern times the temperature does occasionally fall below freezing, but that it averages something closer to forty degrees Fahrenheit, but climates can change dramatically over two thousand years. Maybe it was ten degrees every night or maybe it was sixty. I have never seen any documentation of either claim.

There is also the faint possibility that December 25th was chosen because it is possible that Yeshua was conceived sometime near Hanukkah, which is celebrated beginning on Kislev 25 and is always within a few weeks of December 25th. Kislev, being a month on a foreign calendar, was changed to December and the day came to be celebrated as a birthdate instead of as a conception date. More speculation.

Absent proof of one hypothesis or the other, I’m not going to raise a stink about it. If everyone wants to celebrate Yeshua’s birth on December 25th, then I’m OK with that.

Christmas Trees

Every report I have heard says that Christmas trees were adopted from a Germanic solstice tradition. One such report said that some Germanic tribes would bring a tree inside their house as some sort of talisman against the symbolic death of the shortest day of the year. The living tree within their home helped preserve their own lives and ensured another prosperous year. I have no clue if that is correct.

Also consider the prophecy of Jeremiah 10:2-5:

So says the LORD, Do not learn the way of the nations, and do not be terrified at the signs of the heavens; for the nations are terrified at them. For the customs of the people are vain; for one cuts a tree out of the forest with the axe, the work of the hands of the workman. They adorn it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and hammers, so that it will not wobble. They are like a rounded post, and they cannot speak. They must surely be lifted, because they cannot walk. Do not be afraid of them; for they cannot do evil nor good, for it is not in them.

I doubt that Jeremiah was thinking of Christmas trees when he copied these words from God, but the parallel is too striking to ignore. The pagans are terrified of the signs of the heavens, signs like the winter solstice, in response to which they cut a tree out of the forest, bring it back to their house, and decorate it. Perhaps Jeremiah had never heard of the German people or their Yuletide traditions. Perhaps he thought he was only writing about carved idols inlaid with gold and silver.

But then again, perhaps God had a wider perspective than Jeremiah.

It seems obvious that, despite many efforts to apply Christian meaning to the Christmas tree, it is not of biblical origin. It was almost certainly adopted from some pagan religious rite. However harmless it might seem, I can’t see any way that it does not violate God’s command to not adopt pagan religious practices. Justifying it by saying we are doing it in his honor adds insult to injury. Does it help the adulteress’ case to claim she was thinking of her husband at the time?

Yule

The Twelve Days of Christmas, Yule logs, Yule Tide, and Yule everything else is unquestionably pagan. There is nothing biblical about it, and claiming otherwise is pointless.

Candles

I suspect the tradition of candles placed in the windows was adopted from Hanukkah, in which an 8 or 9 candle menorah is lit and placed where it can be seen through the house’s windows. While this tradition is not included in the Scriptures of the canon, it is not done in honor of any pagan gods. It is done solely in honor of a miracle that God performed in fulfillment of prophecies in Daniel and in preparation for greater fulfillments to come. I say light ‘em up.

Gift Giving

One tradition says that gift giving was adopted from Saturnalia. Another says that it was instituted in honor of the gifts brought to Yeshua by the magi. Either one seems like speculation to me. I have never seen evidence either way.

Mistletoe

Wherever the mistletoe tradition came from, it wasn’t from the Bible or anything else surrounding the birth of Yeshua. I’m not sure if it has anything to do with a pagan religious practice either. It may be a superstition related to fertility, but not necessarily a fertility rite performed as part of any kind of worship. It could be something akin to Jacob’s striped sticks or Rachel’s mandrake.

Red and Green

Once again, I have never heard of documentation for claims of pagan origins for the colors red and green. On the other hand, I can’t imagine how it might be derived from Scripture. I suspect it is a harmless tradition based on one of the most hopeful denizens of winter: evergreen hollies.

Lest anyone think I might be turning into the Grinch, I am not interested in making anyone else conform to my opinions on Christmas. There will be no Christmas trees or Yule logs in my house, but you need to make your own decisions about it. I am not going to complain about nativity scenes or Christmas trees on public property, and I am not going to tell you you’re going to hell for your cheese log. These are just some rambling thoughts relevant to the day. They might even be wrong. As always, I reserve the right to change my mind.
Have fun. Enjoy yourself. But consider giving your traditions a little more thought as to whether or not they please God. He is, after all, the reason for this and all other seasons. Is he not?

Add your thoughts if you want. I might disagree, but I’ll try not to call you any bad names. ;-)

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

The Truth Is Out There

Thursday, December 21st, 2006

And most of the time, all you have to do is ask.

Losing by Winning…and then losing

Tuesday, December 19th, 2006

This is an interesting phenomenon of war. If you want to introduce large portions of a completely foreign culture into your own, start a war.

After the Greeks conquered Judah, Jews scattered all over the Greek-ruled territories carrying their culture and learning with them.

After the Romans persecuted Christians, the empire became Christian.

After Europeans began conquering and colonizing the rest of the world, they learned about tea, coffee, chocolate, tobacco, maize, and turkey. Then all the Pakistanis became London cab drivers.

After fighting over large portions of North Africa, killing lots of people, and then running away, the French experienced a huge wave of immigration and cultural importation from Africa.

After pounding Vietnam half way to oblivion, killing lots of people, and then running away, the United States experienced a huge wave of immigration and cultural importation from Southeast Asia.

After invading several Middle-Eastern countries, killing lots of people, and then threatening to run away, the United States is experiencing a huge wave of immigration and cultural importation from the Middle East.

Not overhauling the culture fast enough? Just send more troops!

It’s almost like there’s a pattern.

Do you think anyone else has noticed?

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Lamech’s Two Wives

Monday, December 18th, 2006

There is not a single extraneous character recorded in the Torah (Matthew 5:18). Every word is written for a purpose, and there is nothing wasted. This is one reason why the names of wives are rarely mentioned: not because women were considered unimportant, but because their names were not significant to the point being made. So when the names of Lamech’s wives are given without further information, we should immediately ask why.

As a descendant of Cain and a probable murderer, Lamech is often used to demonstrate how God does not approve of polygamy. “See? The first recorded polygamist was also a murderer and of the line of Cain. It must be wrong!” Too great a dependence on the Law of First Mention is a theological land mine all on its own, but apart from that, they are ignoring some important details in the story.

Lamech’s wives names can be translated roughly as “ornament” and “shadow.” Ornamentation is a symbol of wealth and shadow is often used in scripture to symbolize a powerful patronage. Could Lamech’s wives symbolize wealth and power as mulitple wives often do? Perhaps one father-in-law brought him great wealth, and the other was a king or warlord. Lamech’s declaration that he would be avenged seventy-seven times was a declaration of independence from God and immunity to the vengeance of men. He believed his access to wealth and power provided him with greater protection than God.

The point of Lamech’s story is not to highlight the evils of polygamy, but rather the evils of pride and the abuse of power.

Technorati Tags: lamech, polygyny, polygamy, first mention

And God Said…

Monday, December 18th, 2006

The heavens vanish.

You fold them up like a cloth.

Your Word never ends.