Letting God run things his way is always difficult. We think we know what we’re doing, and our own opinions drown out that still, small voice. Abraham’s story helps keep that in perspective. Would I recognize God’s voice if he told me to kill my own son? And how about Ezekiel living in the cave and cooking everything over dung? God’s ways…I may never understand, but I pray that I will know him whenever he calls.
Archive for January, 2007
God’s Ways
Sunday, January 7th, 2007Lamech and First Mention…Again
Thursday, January 4th, 2007The Law of First Mention is a method of hermeneutics in which the student interprets all scriptural references to a given concept primarily in light of its very first mention. This is a very subjective method of Biblical interpretation, and a very dangerous one, because it quickly breaks down into nonsense. While it is often asserted that polygyny must be wrong, because the first polygynist was a murderer, we could as easily assert that polygyny must be right, because it led to the invention of all wind and string instruments. (See Genesis 4:21.) In fact, the sequence of the narrative would render our case even stronger than the former: Moses told of Lamech’s polygyny, then of his descendants’ inventions, and only then does he tell of Lamech killing another man. The absurdity of this train of logic is evident, but many people have no difficulty using the same method to declare all forms of polygamy to be perversions on the basis of Lamech.
Technorati Tags: polygamy, polygyny, Lamech, law of first mention, first mention, torah, genesis
Check out A Commentary on Marriage in the Bible!
Biblical Monogamists
Wednesday, January 3rd, 2007How many verifiably monogamous men are there in the Bible? (By monogamous, I mean according to their status and not their doctrine.) Off the top of my head I can only think of five, although I’m sure there must be others:
- Adam
- Noah
- Shem
- Japheth
- Ham
Technorati Tags: monogamy, polygamy, monogamists, polygamists, bible
Check out A Commentary on Marriage in the Bible!
The Christ Clone Trilogy
Wednesday, January 3rd, 2007(I wrote this review back in 2000, but these books are so much better than their more popular competition that I thought it should be reposted.)
The Christ Clone Trilogy The older I get, the less I enjoy surprises. It isn’t so much that I like everything in life to be thoroughly planned and executed, but more that surprises are almost invariably disappointments. The Tribulation Force books surprised me. With all the praise surrounding the series, I expected more than was there. The characters were cookie-cutter heroes and villains and the plot was completely lacking in…well…surprises. It’s a good and inspiring story, but its literary quality–or rather its lack of it–disappointed me. And, unfortunately, it’s not alone. It is probably a good thing for the genre that there has been an almost unbroken string of apocalyptic films and novels over the last few decades. Without the constant attention, I doubt that many would think twice about the Antichrist or the Mark of the Beast. There certainly hasn’t been anything memorable about any of these works individually.
Not like other genres such as romance, which has Gone With the Wind, and westerns, which have The Virginian, and fantasy, which has The Hobbit. Over my relatively short lifetime, I have read thousands of books, most of them science fiction and fantasy novels. Out of all those books there are a very few which I remember clearly–perhaps one in a few hundred. Tolkien’s The Hobbit and its accompanying Lord of the Rings Trilogy; Dan Simmons’ The Fall of Hyperion; Lewis’ That Hideous Strength. Jewels of literature that are completely unforgettable.
That’s why I really didn’t expect very much when James BeauSeigneur first contacted me about his Christ Clone Trilogy. From the title, it was obviously another end-times, antichrist story. I was certain he had read my last review of an end-times novel, and, believe me, it wasn’t flattering. When I saw the publisher’s name, SelectiveHouse, I was impressed even less. Who is SelectiveHouse? A low budget job, for sure. The cover graphics didn’t boost the books’ first impression. But you know what they say about covers.
With a sigh of resignation, I sat down to begin the first of the series, In His Image. By page one sixty-seven, I already knew that I could sum up the entire series in a single word: Surprise! Apocalypse fans, here is your Hobbit. Every turn was unexpected. The characters were real. The plot was real. And never have I seen the Seven Seals broken with such clarity and imagination–if you think you know darkness, think again.
In His Image follows the life of Decker Hawthorne through the historical examination of the Shroud of Turin in 1978, three years as the hostage of Lebanese terrorists, the Disaster and the ensuing oscillations of the world through chaos, peace, and to chaos again. But to focus on Hawthorne’s life is to see only one of many levels of plot. Several years after the trip to Italy, a scientist discovers live skin cells on a sample taken from the Shroud. Cloning these cells results in discoveries that lead to treatments for cancer, AIDS, and many other diseases. It also leads to Christopher Goodman.
Goodman is one of the few characters that take time to become real. At first he was very two-dimensional. With a few exceptions, his actions and dialogue were predictable. But as you watch him grow up–the first book covers a span of about 33 years–he becomes genuinely likeable. He seems a good man, through and through.
There are several characters I instinctively distrusted. Robert Milner, a New Age mystic and the Assistant Secretary-General of the United Nations, and Jon Hansen, the Secretary-General, come immediately to mind. But a hallmark of a superior writer is the ability to make you see the good in the bad guys and the bad in the good guys. It’s difficult for me to imagine sympathizing with anyone who would promote the United Nations, but by the end of the book I was pleasantly surprised to be thinking of Jon Hansen in the same light as Dag Hammerskjold. How do such good men come to such power in such corrupt organizations?
But the surprises don’t end there. In His Image holds surprises in the characters and in their individual stories. The second book, Birth of an Age, holds surprises of a different sort. The fulfillment of the prophecies of Daniel, John, and others begin coming at a faster pace, but rarely in the form I expected. The Seventh Sign, The Stand, The Omen, and Rosemary’s Baby all stand out for their complete disregard of Biblical prophecy. Tribulation Force tries to remain Biblically true, but fails for lack of depth and imagination. BeauSeigneur has no problem in either department. You can follow along in John’s Revelation, but you will still not know what’s coming next. Every prophecy is fulfilled in ways I would never have expected, but that, in retrospect, make so much sense. I won’t pretend to be a prophecy expert, but if you subscribe to evangelical eschatology–or for that matter, even if you don’t believe in prophecy at all–you won’t be able to stop reading. I read the first book in about one week. I read the second book in one night, and the third, Acts of God, in another night.
Birth of an Age kept me guessing as to who were the good guys and who were the bad guys. Acts of God left no doubt. While a little wordy at times, it was fascinating to watch all the threads come together into this complex tapestry. With vast portions of the planet completely uninhabited after two nuclear wars and a series of astronomical disasters, the Beast is finally revealed.
BeauSeigneur is not a perfect writer. His form and structure isn’t perfect. His characterization isn’t perfect. But it’s so close you might not even notice. These are some of the few books about which I can honestly say, “Wow!”
-jay carper, January 17, 2000
Technorati Tags: beast, mark of the beast, antichrist, cloning, second coming, eschatology, prophecy, revelation, end times, james beauseigneur
NTFS and Share Permissions
Wednesday, January 3rd, 2007NTFS Permissions
NTFS permissions apply to files and folders on an NTFS formatted volume in Windows operating systems, including Windows NT 3.51 and above. Using NTFS, you can allow or deny permission to see, select, open, modify, delete, create, and perform other operations. To make all those options easier to manage, Microsoft created five general and self-explanatory sets (or templates) of permissions:
- Full Control
- Modify (or Change)
- Read & Execute
- Read
- Write
You can assign permissions from the Security tab of a file or folder’s properties.
There are two basic rules to remember when assigning NTFS permissions:
- NTFS permissions are cumulative.
- Denied permissions override allowed permissions.
NTFS permissions can be assigned to groups or individual users and are cumulative. This means that if a user has one set of permissions to a folder and a group of which he is a member has another set of permissions, then his effective permissions will be the highest combined permissions between those two sets. Let’s say that you assigned Bill Gates Read permissions to the Microsoft folder on your computer. Bill is a member of the Executives user group, to which you have assigned Write permissions. Bill’s effective permissions are both of those sets added together, allowing him to create, read, and edit files, but not to delete them or change their security settings.
Let’s also say that you assigned Steve Jobs Full Control permissions to the same folder. But Steve is a member of the Competitors user group, to which you have denied Modify permissions. Steve’s effective permissions don’t allow him to create, read, delete, or manipulate files in any way, except in their security settings. Modify doesn’t allow changing permissions or taking ownership of a file, but Full Control does. Subtracting Modify from Full Control leaves Steve with those two special permissions. If he knows how, he will be able to use that to change his own permissions and give himself Full Control again.
Even following those two basic rules can get pretty confusing in a complex environment. In recent operating systems, Microsoft has provided an Effective Permissions tool you can use to check for potential security holes like this one. From the Security tab, click on the Advanced button, then select the Effective Permissions tab. Use the Select button to pick a user or group to evaluate.
Share Permissions
Effective permissions get even more complicated when you use shared folders. Shared folder permissions are cumulative also, but reductive when combined with NTFS permissions. You will get the lowest level of permissions between NTFS and Share.
Let’s say that Bill Clinton has Full Control NTFS permissions to the Intern folder on the White House staff computer. Unfortunately for him, he’s not in the White House anymore. That’s OK, though, because someone was thoughtful enough to share that folder on the network, so he can still access it from Hillary’s computer in her office. However, folders can have share permissions in addition to NTFS permissions. The share permissions act like a glass ceiling that limit what a user can do while accessing folders through that share. Hillary made a phone call to the White House systems administrator who set Bill’s shared folder permissions on the Intern share to Read. This means that no matter what NTFS permissions Bill might have to the Intern folder, he can’t do anything more than Read while accessing that folder through the network share. If he wants to do more than look, he’ll have to get access through another share.
Allow me to use a less nefarious illustration.
A folder is like a high security building. Every door in the building is guarded by a big, scary guy who will check your credentials before he will allow you through. In one room you have Read permissions, in another you have Modify permissions, and in yet another room you have Full Control permissions. As long as you walk in the front door (i.e. log into the computer locally), the guards will let you do whatever your credentials say you can do. Every building has more than one entrance, however, just like a folder can also be accessed via one or more network shares. Each of the entrances to this building has a guard with a different set of instructions. At one entrance (a network share), the guard has instructions (share permissions) to allow you Read permissions only. When you show up at his door, he takes your credentials and stamps Read Only in big red letters. Once inside the building, it doesn’t matter that the NTFS permissions for a particular room say that you have Full Control. The guard for that room won’t let you exercise any permissions higher than Read. Your effective permissions have been restricted by the entrance you used.
So…
- NTFS + NTFS is cumulative.
- Share + Share is cumulative.
- NTFS + Share is reductive.
- Deny trumps all.
Make sense?
Please leave me a note letting me know if this article was helpful. Username: Guest. Password: Guest.
Technorati Tags: windows, ntfs, share, shared, permissions, ntfs permissions, share permissions, shared drives, security, files and folders, windows security