Archive for February, 2007

The Johnny O Band at 4th and Main

Sunday, February 18th, 2007

The Johnny O Band played at 4th and Main in Longmont on the 17th. The music volume and the background noise were both a bit much for just hanging out by myself, so I didn’t stay long. I wish I could have. That was some really nice guitar playing. They played mostly original stuff, but also a little Stevie Ray Vaughan and Jimi Hendrix. They did a great job with both, but were a bit testy for being asked. They made darn sure everyone knew they were not a cover band, and weren’t there to play anyone else’s music. Since they were getting paid, though…

They’re playing happy hour at Nissi’s this Friday. Tickets are $10 in advance. I hate to spend money, but I think I might be able to swing that.

4th and Main is an interesting place, and definitely not a Boulder college bar. The patrons seemed to be thirty-somethings with a smattering of older and younger, mostly older with not an ounce of inhibition. I can’t dance–and haven’t tried in more than eighteen years–but I think I might have fit right in on that floor. There were a few younger ladies who probably wouldn’t have garnered much attention somewhere else (and a couple who would no matter where they were), but they enjoyed all they wanted that night. Not that they were ugly by any means; they just weren’t 9′s or 10′s. You can always improve your hotness score by being in a place with lots of alcohol and competition ten years older.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

The Dearly Departed?

Thursday, February 15th, 2007

Since “dearly” is an adverb, it must refer to the adjective “departed.” So the dearly departed must have departed dearly. Does that mean he took some of the other guys with him? That he paid a high price for the privilege? That we paid a high price? Or was it just bad grammar on the part of the coiner?

Technorati Tags: , ,

To Abolish or Not To Abolish

Wednesday, February 14th, 2007

More theological AADHD:

1. If Paul or anyone else contradicts Yeshua, then he is a false teacher, and not to be heeded. Not at least on that topic. Yeshua was very clear about when even the tiniest part of God’s Law would be abolished: when EVERYTHING in the law and prophets was fulfilled and when heaven and earth had passed away. Neither of those events have happened, therefore not even the tiniest fraction of God’s Law has been abolished.
2. Peter spent years listening to Yeshua’s teachings on everything from man’s made up laws (hand-washing) to adultery to salvation, yet he never once got even the slightest idea that God’s laws on clean vs. unclean had been abolished. (Acts 10:14) Shouldn’t Yeshua have at least mentioned something so important?
3. Peter’s dream about the sheet had nothing to do with eating unclean food. A vision of unclean food was merely the vehicle for the message. It was only about preaching to and fellowshipping with non-Jews. This was also what Paul talked about when he mentioned standing up to Peter. It had nothing to do with what was being eaten, but only with whom it was eaten. Jewish law (not God’s Law) said a Jew was not allowed to eat with gentiles.
4. The Galatians were gentiles, not Jews. What times and seasons could they have been returning to if they had converted from paganism to Chrisianity?
5. After his conversion, Paul participated in sacrifices and rituals at the Temple. He also had Timothy circumcised. Obviously he did not believe that circumcision in itself causes Christ to be of no profit to the circumcised. The problem with Judaizers was that they taught circumcision as necessary for salvation. Paul did not argue that circumcision had been abolished, only that no one ever had to be circumcised to be saved.
6. James’ instructions to new believers were a bottom line, the bare minimum. They were not the sum total of all behavioral standards for believers. Remember that Paul gave several lists of habitual behaviors that would hinder salvation, also, and they were much more extensive than James’. Neither James nor Paul ever said that you had to measure up to those standards in order to become saved, only that salvation BRINGS transformation.
7. If anyone tells you that you must obey the Law of Moses to be saved, then he is telling you a lie. Obedience to God’s commands is evidence (not final proof) of your salvation, but it is absolutely not the mechanism.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Mishpatim 5767

Tuesday, February 13th, 2007

More random thoughts for your amusement and edification:

  • Ex 21:12-14 – Premeditated murder is worse than murder, but both deserve death. Motive and state of mind are irrelevant. The insane and incompetent should be executed for murder along with the cold-blooded killer. Not that I trust any level of our current governments with that responsibility. If somebody I respected was in charge, maybe. See the below comment on Ex 22:1 for one possible way to reduce the ratio of ass to brain and heart in the judiciary.
  • Ex 21:15,17 – Striking one’s parents in a way that might put their lives in danger or even mortally cursing them also deserves death.
  • Ex 21:16 – Kidnapping is stealing a life and should be punished by death.
  • Ex 21:18-19 – If you hurt someone you have to make it right. “Eye for eye, tooth for tooth” is not retribution, but restitution.
  • Ex 21:20-21, 26-27 – Slaves have rights. They are not to be mistreated, but cared for, provided for, educated, and set free with a hefty retirement. Even so much as a lost tooth is cause for freedom. The slavery that is often described as having taken place 150 years ago in America bears almost no resemblence to the slavery allowed by God’s Law. A biblical slave had more legal protections than your average American tax payer today.
  • Ex 21:22-25 – This isn’t just about miscarriage, but also premature delivery. Even so, the guilty man is to pay a fine, and the fine is to be commensurate with the injury caused. That was always the true meaning of “eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth.” It was never about retaliation.
  • Ex 21:28-36 – If you knowingly do things that put other people in danger, you should be treated as if you are the danger. Be careful. If you dig a pit, you will fall into it.
  • Ex 22:1 – Punitive damages for theft should be given to the victim. Judges and police should not be paid, especially not out of fines levied on the guilty, but should be strictly volunteers. In the amount of the fine, no allowance is made for either poverty or wealth. The punishment must be the same regardless of the perpetrator’s ability to pay.
  • Ex 22:2 – If a thief is caught in the act of breaking into your home, you may assume that he is there to hurt you or your family, and you should not be punished for killing him. Concerning Yeshua’s instructions to turn the other cheek: He was not teaching pacifism. He was telling you to be slow to anger, and to not retaliate. “Do not lay hands on anyone quickly,” whether for good or evil, but if someone is breaking into your home in the middle of the night when you are there, they are demonstrating a willingness to hurt or kill you to get your stuff. They don’t deserve any sympathy, and certainly not the protection of the law.
  • Ex 22:3-4 – If stolen goods are recovered intact, the thief should give the items back plus 100% of their value. Once again, poverty or wealth on the part of the perpetrator are irrelevant. If he can’t afford the fine, he should be made to work it off.
  • Ex 22:5-6 – The key in dealing with accidental damages is restitution. The idea is not to punish someone for making a mistake, but to get them to make it right. Punitive damages for real negligence should be strictly limited regardless of the resources of the perpetrator.
  • Ex 22:7-9 – If someone claims something that is not his, the punishment is the same as if for outright theft. He tried to steal through argument rather than force, but he still stole.
  • Ex 22:10-15 – No one is to be held at fault for damages to borrowed property due to causes beyond the borrower’s control. The lender accepts a certain amount of risk in the mere ownership of a thing. However, if the damage is due to the borrower’s negligence or misuse, then he is to make it right.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Yitro 5767

Tuesday, February 6th, 2007

A few random thoughts on Yitro:

  • There must be some kind of behind-the-scenes parallel between Yitro and Laban. Both were unbelievers and God arranged marriages between their daughters and patriarchs of Israel.
  • Zipporah and the Ethiopian woman, Moses’ other wife, are prophetic images of God’s people. Zipporah is the Jews who were sent away under the tutelage of a priesthood (in the form of the rabbinate) gone astray. Like Zipporah, they will be united with the Messiah by that same priesthood after the Greater Exodus. The Ethiopian woman was a believing gentile grafted into Israel, just like the Church. Like her, they are united with the Messiah before the Exodus, and given the Torah in full afterwards.
  • The Ten Commandments can be categorized in many ways. One interesting way is into groups of three, one, and six. The first three commandments deal directly with how we relate to God. Three is the number of divinity and the triune God. The last six commandments deal directly with how we relate to our fellow men. Six is the number of man. The middle command deals with how we relate to God, our fellow men, and ourselves. One is the number of unity. If counted with the first three, this command makes four, which is the number of the Messiah. If counted with the last six, this command makes seven, which is the number of completion. In Yeshua, our divine Sabbath Rest, we are made complete and united with God.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

People Suck

Tuesday, February 6th, 2007

Men suck. Women suck, too. Since I began studying marriage and male/female relationships in the Bible, I have been convinced that Isaiah 3 very closely matches our society here in America (and probably most of the rest of the world too):

  • Our most capable men have been killed in war or are so discouraged by injustice and/or hard circumstances that they are focusing on their own little worlds and hiding from the rest of the world.
  • Their absense left a vacuum that has been filled by children (Remember the political rallying cry of “But it’s for the children!”), women, and weak men.
  • Injustice is the rule rather than the exception in our “justice” system. Your divorce is a prime example. The divorces of more honorable men who are financially shafted and denied access to their children are other examples.
  • Physical appearance is everything, while character is nothing. Loose women who flaunt their independence and licentiousness are admired and called strong, while conservative women who keep a low profile and dedicate their lives to their children and husbands are made bitter by years of maltreatment and scorn.

The solution to every social ill is always more faithfulness to God by all members. That’s easy to say, of course, but difficult to interpret, and even more difficult to implement.

Two things from Isaiah 3 jump out at me: backbone and humility. Besides Yeshua, who in the Bible were exemplaries of backbone and humility? The examples that immediately come to my mind are Moses, David, Deborah, and Abigail. Moses was called the most humble man that ever lived, yet he stood up to Pharaoh and ruled millions through hardship and war. David constantly wrote of his unworthiness and refused to attack his own king who tried to kill him, yet men flocked to his side and he was Israel’s greatest general and king. Deborah stayed out of the limelight except when she was called, and then she led a nation in justice and war by the respect of its people and the blessing of their God. Abigail loved her husband in her deeds even if she despised his character in her heart. When his life was threatened by a powerful warlord bent on revenge, she didn’t step aside and gain her freedom. She confronted the warlord and saved her husband’s life.

I won’t presume to tell you what you need to do. That wouldn’t be my place, even if I knew what to say. There might not even be a magic bullet that will fix all your problems. In fact, I’m positive there isn’t. I will tell you this, though: the only way our people will find more good men is if they grow some balls and get down on their knees in prayer. The only way our people will find more good women is if they thumb their noses at who television and Cosmo says they should be and submit to God and their husbands.

You want to find a good man? Look for Moses and David. You want to find a good woman? Look for Deborah and Abigail (unmarried, of course). Where are you going to find them? I don’t have a clue. Keep the faith, though. There’s no other way that God can bless you.

Technorati Tags: men, women, dating, marriage, character, isaiah

More Global Warming, Please

Friday, February 2nd, 2007

With the Denver area temps ranging between -8° and -18° at 6 AM today, I’m thinking I could use a bit of that famous French global warming. Throw in a hot cup of cocoa, and I’ll be your friend forever.

Technorati Tags: , ,