Archive for October, 2007

Chayei Sarah 5768 – Father, Son, and Unnamed Servant

Tuesday, October 30th, 2007

Some more thoughts on The Life of Sarah:

In the Scriptures, unnamed servants are often symbolic of God’s Spirit. Although we know Abraham’s senior servant was Eliezer, he is not named in the course of this story. Abraham, whose name means “Father,” charged his Servant with the task of finding a wife for his son, Isaac. When he arrived at the well of Haran, he prayed that God would reveal the right woman by way of a test of selflessness. When Rebekah passed the test, she was given gifts and asked to accompany the servant back to Canaan to be with her new husband.

This story is an image of the Messiah and his Bride. Abraham represents God, the Father. He sends the Spirit into the world to find those who are qualified to be his people. When the Spirit has identified God’s people from among all the others at the well, he gives them an extravagant gift and asks if they will accompany him to the Messiah. The bride price was paid before the bride had even been asked. It was a downpayment, an “earnest,” of the covenant that was promised. (2 Cor 1:22, 2 Cor 5:5, Eph 1:13-14) The bride of the Messiah leaves the world of her own free will and follows the Spirit to the Messiah in the Promised Land, sight unseen. She joins the Messiah in faith that he is who he claims to be and has the power to deliver on his promises.

Important points to ponder:

  1. Not everyone who is called to the well is chosen.
  2. The defining characteristic of God’s people is selflessness, a willingness to put oneself out for the benefit of others.
  3. Rebekah (aka the Bride of Christ or the Congregation of Israel) was not kidnapped in the middle of the night, but was asked to leave suddenly without time to make extensive preparations or say long goodbyes.
  4. The Bride joins the Messiah in the Promised Land for Sukkot (aka the Feast of Tabernacles/Tents). How much do you want to bet that Isaac’s marriage really was on the anniversary of Sukkot 400 years in advance?

Technorati Tags: chayei sarah, sukkot, tabernacles, feast of tabernacles, messiah, yeshua, jesus, second coming, rapture

Chayei Sarah 5768 – The Next Generation

Tuesday, October 30th, 2007

Genesis 23:2 – And Sarah died… I have heard that not much is told of Abraham after the death of Sarah so that Abraham was no longer a vital force without her, implying that there is only one true mate for every person. In reality, the opposite seems to be the case. This is the sequence of events given at the end of Abraham’s story:

  • Akeda
  • The death and burial of Sarah
  • Marriage of Isaac
  • Distribution of inheritances
  • Death and burial

It seems that if any event marked the end of Abraham’s significance to the continuing redemption story it must be Isaac’s marriage and not Sarah’s death.  I will go a step further and say that Sarah’s significance also ended at Isaac’s marriage. Their story reached its climax in the Akeda and the rest of the narrative is concerned with handing the reins to the next generation.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Bible Verified Again

Monday, October 29th, 2007

Ancient seal confirmed to be Queen Jezebel’s. Archeaology validates the Biblical account of history yet again. It astounds me that, against all reason, many archeaologists continue to prefer to believe in the essential completeness of known physical evidence and the speculation of their peers over the accuracy of the Bible. The evidence is terribly incomplete and is frequently interpreted in the most anti-biblical light possible. Over time those interpretations have been consistently proven wrong, but they never seem to learn from their mistakes.

The fool has said in his heart, “There is no God.”

Get ‘em Started Early!

Wednesday, October 24th, 2007

An AFP news article, Parents of missing Maddie reject sedative allegations, reports

The parents of Madeleine McCann who disappeared in Portugal rejected Wednesday as “outrageous” allegations they gave their children sedatives, in their first interview since being named as suspects in the case.

I don’t know why that should be so outrageous. I know a doctor who routinely gave his young children cough medicine and other drugs to make them sleep or stop crying. It’s sick, but it happens all the time.

Judy Woodruff and Ron Paul

Wednesday, October 24th, 2007

Judy Woodruff interviewed Ron Paul a couple of weeks ago. He handled himself very well. I think he is partly wrong about Israel and the Middle East, but his overall solution is correct.

…I’m talking about a noninterventionist foreign policy. The founding fathers taught us about it, no entangling alliance. Don’t get involved in the internal affairs. If you eventually did that in the Middle East, yes, we would be less vulnerable.

But just to back away a little bit and still have our puppet governments in Saudi Arabia, support Israel against the Palestinians, and be in Afghanistan, no, it’s not going to change anything. As long as we have this mercantilistic idea that it’s our oil, we have to be over there, we have to have cheap oil, we’re going to be resented.

But you have to — as long as we keep doing what we’re doing, it’s going to get worse. If we start backing away, they might reassess things. But we’re doomed to failure. And the Republican Party has already suffered the consequences, because they, you know, did so badly last year. And it’s going to get worse if we don’t change our policies.

I don’t think the radical Islamists will reassess things in our favor no matter what we do. They haven’t been rational for 1500 years, so they’re not going to start thinking straight now. Especially not people like those Palestinians who danced in the streets when the world trade center towers fell. However, we still need to get out of Iraq and the Middle East in general. The idea that we’re somehow buying some security by waging war over there is absurd. Attacking al Qaeda makes some sense, but we never really did that with more than half a heart. As a people, Americans don’t seem to have the werewithall to wage real war, and if we’re not going to do it right, why are we doing it at all? It only seems to be about money and power for a few here in America, and that does not make a just war.

I’m a strong supporter of Israel and a strong detractor of the Palestinians, but Paul is right on that score too. The Palestinians don’t deserve their own country, and I wouldn’t shed a single tear if Israel invaded the West Bank and Gaza Strip and deported (or shot) every last person who had anything to do with the PLO, Hamas, or Fatah. In fact, all Arabs would probably be better off if they invited Israel to take over all their governments. They would have more peace, more prosperity, and more freedom than they have now. But what does that have to do with the United States government? Individual Americans should be free to support whatever side they want in strictly foreign disagreements. They should be free to send money and cookies to Israeli soldiers or Hamas thugs (I’m not revealing any bias there am I?), whichever they prefer. But they should never be allowed to take money from me against my will and give it to either side. I don’t care which side is right or wrong, stealing is still stealing.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Vayeira 5768 – Divine Genocide

Tuesday, October 23rd, 2007

A chart inspired by the comments on my last post:

Ante-deluvian
Genesis 6
Sodom & Gomorrah
Genesis 18-19
Egypt
Exodus 1-4
Canaan
Joshua
Commonality
Primary Cause Violence Violence Oppression &
infanticide
Child sacrifice Violence
Possible Secondary Cause Sexual immorality Sexual immorality Idolatry & hard-heartedness Idolatry ?
Means of Destruction Flood Fire & brimstone Ten plagues War Miraculous
Means of Escape Ark Feet Blood & feet Red cord, feet, & deception Divine guidance
& human action

The primary cause in each case of divine genocide was unjust violence. There were definitely secondary issues, such as homosexuality, temple prostitution, hard heartedness, etc., but I don’t think those were named as causes.

The means of destruction was always at least partly divine. In the case of the Canaanites, God used the Israelites, but they were still assisted by direct divine intervention.

The means of escape were never solely divine. God always provided guidance and sometimes protection, but people were always partly responsible for their own safety. If Noah hadn’t built the ark, he would have died with the rest. If Lot hadn’t walked away from Sodom, if the Israelites hadn’t painted their lintels and crossed the Red Sea, if Rahab hadn’t hung the red cord, or the Jebusites deceived Joshua, they all would have died.

Remember one of the lessons of Lech Lecha: What happens to the fathers, happens also to the children.

(The destruction of the Canaanites doesn’t fit into this scheme as neatly as the other three do. For one thing, the Canaanites weren’t a single civilization, but multiple independent city-states with varying degrees of spiritual sickness. Some were allowed to leave if they were able, while some were to be completely wiped out, with no escape possible.)

The Righteous with the Wicked

Monday, October 22nd, 2007

Another book excerpt for your enjoyment and edification…

Genesis 18:22-32
…wilt thou also destroy the righteous with the wicked?
  In a city of some thirty or forty thousands God found only one man who had not given himself to licentiousness. If God had found only ten men—less than one-tenth of one percent—he would have called the city redeemable. This shows the forbearance of God. Sodom was not destroyed capriciously, but was given every chance to redeem herself. Some call her destruction unjust and call God cruel and unloving; they ask how can God be love when he shows such hatred? They say such things because they do not understand love. They have in mind the indefinable slush of popular romance stories, which have as much to do with love as sugar has to do with nutrition. God’s actions against Sodom, Gomorrah, and later, all of Canaan, demonstrate the love of a physician who removes a tumor or a gangrenous limb to save his patient’s life. What love can a man have for a diseased limb? If he loves the rest of his body, he cuts it off as God removed Sodom, showing love for her neighbors. Even then, God is much more capable than any human surgeon. If even a relatively small percentage of your leg is infected, your doctor will order the whole thing removed. But all God needs to redeem the whole limb is one tiny piece of healthy tissue. All that was healthy in Sodom was one man. His daughters and wife were too far gone, but God still saved some of them for Lot’s sake. He would have saved them all if they had been willing. God gave them a choice to escape and they refused, so a few of the redeemable were destroyed by their own choice along with the reprobate. If Lot, a man whom Peter called righteous and just, had refused to leave, thinking he might convert a few of the Sodomites before the end, then he too would have been destroyed. When it finally rains, it rains on everyone.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

Broncos vs. Steelers – Elam does it again

Sunday, October 21st, 2007

Broncos, you are absolved.

Was the Broncos defense really that good at shutting down the Steelers receivers, or did Roethlisberger really have that much misplaced confidence in his front line? He kept taking forever to get the ball off, and, time after time, he had to scramble to escape the Broncos tackles. He wasn’t always successful.

Technorati Tags: ,

UFC 77 – Mostly Boring

Sunday, October 21st, 2007

Kalib Starnes vs Alan Belcher

Starnes is a boxer without a lot of grappling experience, so I didn’t expect much from him. He didn’t disappoint. The fight started out fast and furious, but a nasty cut over his right eye prompted the doc to call it.

Stephan Bonner vs Eric Schafer

Even with Schafer mounted on his back, Bonner never lost control of this fight. Schafer wanted to take it to the ground from the beginning, but couldn’t cause any real damage. Once Bonner took the top, however, Schafer was helpless.

Tim Sylvia vs Brandon Vera

Boooring. Normally, I would have called this one for Sylvia, no contest, but with his serious back injury last year, it seemed like a toss up. Vera kind of gives me the creeps, though, so I was still hoping Sylvia would take him. Rounds one and two were boring. Sylvia kept pushing Vera against the fence, and just holding him there. Vera really tried to make it more exciting, but couldn’t break free. He’s a big guy, but next to Sylvia he must have felt like my car in front of this pickup truck. (I could see the bottom of his front bumper over my hood.)

 

471aeafb4f682.jpg

 

To Vera’s credit, he fought hard, despite a broken hand suffered in the first round. The third round was more exciting, with Sylvia finally getting into strike mode. He clinched the win with a series of devastating elbows and short punches.

Jorge Gurgel vs Alvin Robinson

Robinson did a great job on the bottom. He had a great defense, but throughout round one, Gurgel still seemed to be in control. Both of these guys are juijitsu masters, and they were a blast to watch. However, Gurgel took a couple of hard hits in round two, and then proceeded to take a serious pounding. It wasn’t much fun to watch, and I’ll bet it was even less fun to feel.

Anderson Silva vs Rich Franklin

I expected a whole lot more out of this fight, too. Franklin’s jaw seemed awfully fragile. He went down by TKO in the first round, and that should have been the end of it, but buzzer beat the ref to the call. It wasn’t much of a breather, though, because he went down again when his jaw met Silva’s knee less than thirty seconds into round two. Silva was very cool about it, though, giving Franklin a seiza and rei twice after the fight.

Ryan Jensen vs Demian Maia

Demian was way too good on the ground for Jensen, and it was over by rear naked choke in the first round. Then there was a couple of minutes of awkward hug fest. A fitting end to an awkward UFC event.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Pharaoh’s Test Drive

Friday, October 19th, 2007

Another excerpt from my book that should be released sometime within the next forty years:

Genesis 12:15

…the woman was taken into Pharaoh’s house. Sarai was taken to live in Pharaoh’s house, but only in a state of semi-betrothal (v19). Apparently, it was a widespread practice for a wealthy man to take his prospective bride into his house–often against her will–as a sort of hostage in order to influence negotiations with her family and to forestall other potential suitors. Other possible reasons for this practice may have been to ensure the bride’s purity and to watch for indications of sickness which appear over time. The same practice can be seen in the similar events in Gerar (Genesis 20:1-18), in the story of Dinah and Shechem, and in the story of Queen Esther. There is something similar among modern polygamous families. A prospective bride might live with the groom and his family for a period of several months to a year so that she can be certain their lifestyle will suit her and so that any personality conflicts with existing wives might be made obvious before a binding commitment is made.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Get the book: