Archive for January, 2008

Mishpatim 5768 – Undercover

Tuesday, January 29th, 2008

Exodus 22:18 – Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.

Samuel told Saul that “Rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft.” Other than the obvious rebellion of doing something forbidden, the connection used to escape me. How is rebellion like witchcraft?

The Hebrew word translated “witch” is kashaf. Maybe the past couple of weeks spent pondering biblical references to headcoverings has got me in a rut, but when I read Adam Clarke’s comments on this verse, something clicked.

It is very likely that the Hebrew…cashaph, and the Arabic cashafa, had originally the same meaning, to uncover, to remove a veil, to manifest, reveal, make bare or naked…The mecashshephah or witch, therefore, was probably a person who professed to reveal hidden mysteries, by commerce with God, or the invisible world.

If Clarke was correct, then the connection would seem to be in the uncovering of things that should remain hidden. Necromancy, fortune telling, and spiritism are all areas of knowledge that God said not to delve. There are times when a head should be covered or uncovered, and the same is true for other things. Like uncovering a head as if to disdain the authority it represents, witchcraft removes the cover of Torah, which God put in place to protect his people. It is a rejection of his providence and authority.

Veils, Tallits, and Covering

Monday, January 28th, 2008

When Moses came down from Mt. Sinai, his face glowed and he wore a veil over his face to hide the glory of it from the Israelites. I was taught that this was a purely pragmatic act, that he had absorbed so much of God’s glory that nobody could withstand it. I don’t think that’s true. When he was about God’s business–for example, when he spoke the Torah to the assembled Israelites and when he was in the tent communing directly with God–he removed the veil. When he was about more mundane business–for example, judging legal cases and performing administrative duties in the camp–he wore the veil. The key distinction is not whether or not the person in front of him could stand to look at him, but whether or not it was appropriate to display directly God’s glory.

I think it was important that he did not appear to be speaking for God at every waking moment. He wasn’t Pharaoh’s replacement god; he was an emissary for that replacement. He had to hide his face so that the Israelites would not be tempted to worship him or to take every word as divine law. Removing the veil was like the pope speaking ex cathedra. He removed the veil when he read God’s Law, because he wanted Israel to see God speaking.

After studying the biblical mentions of veils and the like, I’ve concluded that coverings in general are emblems of authority, protection, and separation. There are several different kinds of coverings talked about in scripture: headcoverings, veils, mantles (or stoles), robes of state, wraps, hangings, bedding, and shadows.

I think that headcoverings and mantles are two sides of the same coin. How the covering is worn or used advertises the bearer’s relationship to the authority. Worn on the head, they indicate submission to the authority of someone else over the wearer. One who is under authority is obligated to obey, but is entitled to protection and provision. To a certain extent, he shares in the power of that authority. Worn on the shoulders, a covering represent the authority carried by the wearer. Think of Atlas holding the world on his shoulders. One who carries authority is responsible for its exercise and for the protection and provision of its subjects. Paul’s argument regarding the wearing of headcoverings in worship helps to clarify this principle that the Torah and the prophets only alluded to.

Some examples of coverings representing the bearing of authority:

  • Elijah was a chief prophet and the headmaster of a school. He wore a mantle on his shoulders as a badge of office and passed it on to his successor, Elisha.
  • The High Priest wore an onyx stone bearing the names six of the twelve tribes on each of his shoulders. They represented his right to judge the nation on spiritual matters, while he wore a gold plate with twelve different precious stones over his heart to represent his obligation to judge with love and mercy.
  • Jacob gave Joseph a coat of many colors. Immediately after that, Joseph dreamed that all of Israel would someday bow to him. I don’t think that Jacob meant for Joseph’s coat to represent anything except his affection, but God had other plans. Think of the twelve differently colored stones on the High Priests breastplate. How much do you want to bet that there were exactly twelve different colors on Joseph’s coat?

Some examples of coverings representing submission to authority or protection:

  • Ruth covered herself with a corner of Boaz’s tallit as a subtle marriage proposal.
  • Boaz told Ruth to remove her veil–something that should only be done by someone in authority: a husband or father, for instance–so that he could fill it with barley. He was replying in the affirmative to her proposal.
  • Paul argued that a woman who prays or prophecies without a headcovering dishonors her husband.
  • Headcoverings were frequently used to hide shame or sorrow, a response which I believe to be very closely related to submission.
  • The Hebrew word for “pitch” in the story of Noah’s ark literally means “covering.” The same word is also translated “bribe” or “ransom.”
  • After God threatened Abimelech’s life for attempting to take a prophet’s wife as his own, Abimelech told Sarah that Abraham was a covering for her.
  • In the trial of a wife suspected of adultery, the priest removes her headcovering before subjecting her to the ordeal, symbolizing the removal of her husband’s protection.

Noah’s pitch coated his ark to keep out the floods that destroyed the rest of the world, like Yeshua’s blood that separates us from our world and its eventual fate. Likewise, the Hebrew word translated “mercy seat” in Exodus 25:17 referring to the lid of the Ark of the Covenant actually doesn’t have anything to do with seats, although it does imply mercy. It means “lid” or “cover” and comes from the same root as the word translated as “pitch.” Both coverings protect the contents of a wooden box from something outside. The Ark of the Covenant represents (at least on one level) the heart of a human being. It’s where David said he hid God’s law and where God says he wants to write it in every person. We can’t face God in our natural state directly, but in the Tabernacle, God’s presence hovered above the Ark. The mercy seat represents Yeshua’s role as our High Priest and intermediary with the Father, who sees us through the filter of his son. In this case, Yeshua as our covering takes on almost every aspect symbolized by all the other types of coverings. He hides us from an overwhelming power. He seals our hearts off from the rest of the world. He commands our obedience as we submit to him.

Tamar wore a veil to hide her identity but also to subtly tell Judah that the deaths of his sons weren’t her fault. Her very name means “upright.” The real problem was with Judah’s sons and their mother. Through the entire humiliating ordeal, she remained submitted to authority, and thereby wound up with Judah’s life and power in her hands. She took his staff (a symbol of power and authority) and rings (rings, bracelets, and ear/nose rings are symbols of betrothal and ownership) from him, and returned them in such a way that had he insisted on prosecuting her, he would have forfeited his own life.

Other coverings represent the outpouring of one spirit or another or separation from God or protection from danger or comfort. I could probably write a book on this topic alone. Enough for now, though. I need to incorporate some of this into the current book first.

Yitro 5768 – Family Government

Saturday, January 26th, 2008

Exodus 18:18

Thou art not able to perform it thyself alone. Although the husband is meant to be the head of his house, the head cannot live or even command the body on its own. Effective command requires the trust and cooperation of the commanded as well as good communication and delegation. A husband’s and father’s authority may be freely delegated to servants, sons, and wives. When his children are young, he authorizes his executive officer, his wife. Later, that responsibility should gradually move to his lieutenants, his sons, as he teaches them to be men. Under most circumstances, the firstborn son should be placed ahead of his siblings, but that is not an inviolate law. Reuben was passed over for Judah, Ishmael for Isaac, et cetera, all for good reasons. The point is that a man cannot expect to effectively govern his house on his own. He must train his family to lead in his place, and he must trust them to do so.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

A Manifest Conclusion

Wednesday, January 23rd, 2008

Study: False statements preceded war

WASHINGTON – A study by two nonprofit journalism organizations found that President Bush and top administration officials issued hundreds of false statements about the national security threat from Iraq in the two years following the 2001 terrorist attacks.

The study concluded that the statements “were part of an orchestrated campaign that effectively galvanized public opinion and, in the process, led the nation to war under decidedly false pretenses.”

This required a study? Really?

Technorati Tags: ,

Rhodium

Monday, January 21st, 2008

A few years back I seriously thought about trying to buy Rhodium. It was cheaper than gold, and someone–I think it was Mark Call–told me it was extremely underpriced. At the time, I was mostly curious. I was more concerned with finding the money for groceries than for investments. (Deja vu moment.) Now I wish I’d skipped meat in favor of metal. while I was growing my waistline, rhodium grew in dollar-worth by more than 1800%!

 

 

5-Year Rhodium Chart
5-year rhodium chart from kitco.com
  

Technorati Tags: ,

Renters and Phishers

Monday, January 21st, 2008

I rent out my spare room, and I receive far more phishing attempts than legitimate inquiries from real renters. This one is the most common:

Hi,

Hello to You overthere and how is your day? I saw your advert that You have a room available for rent and i am interested in knowing the availability of the place and i will also want to know more about the place, neighboourhood ,and the utilities included…?

I am Kristen Hall,a Medical Humanitarian Nurse ,and ve been involve since the past 8 years,taking care of the motherless babies,Homeless one and all of that,I am still kind of young because i just turned 27yrs old…I Can speak both English and German,i love to live with clean people,caring,responsible,neat type. I’m 5″7′ straight,and i am in south Dokota now ,I will want to move by the ending of January depending on the availability of the room ,I speaks English fluently ,so we have no barriers.

I’ll let You know more about me if i am to rent this particular room that you have to offer

I will be anxiously waiting for your next email

Kind Regards

A Medical Humanitarian Nurse? Are there non-medical nurses? Mechanical nurses? Electronic nurses?

The same rules apply to screening these kinds of communications that apply to just about any other electronic communication from someone you don’t know.

  1. Is the person who they say they are? Can they prove it?
  2. Do they they have references?
  3. Are they asking for something unreasonable and very odd? For example, are they asking to rent a room, sight unseen, from a total stranger? Are they asking to accept money for some purpose without receipts or contracts? 
  4. Is the person a foreigner or living overseas?

One time I had an email from someone who claimed to be coming to town for a business-related convention. He said he worked in Nigeria (or some other West African country) for British-American Tobacco. The phisher wanted to stay for one month, but pay for two. He wanted to ship a clothes washer, a wide-screen tv, and a full bedroom suite from Europe, because he just couldn’t bare to be without them. Does anyone ever actually fall for that? A clothes washer!? Is it even possible to be that stupid and still know how to use email?

Update: Also watch out for anyone who asks you to cash a check and then reimburse them a portion of the face value. It’s the Nigerian 419 Scam that has been floating around for years.

Update: BTW, Summer, if you ever get tired of Hollywood, I have an empty room at my place, just for you.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

WTF?

Friday, January 18th, 2008

You hear about this kind of thing now and then (Andrea Yates, et al), but it really seems to be getting crazy lately. Is it really getting worse, or is it a factor of greater news coverage, growing population, or something else?

Three Questions

Tuesday, January 15th, 2008

…I’d like to see answered by every candidate for every political office.

1. Do you believe that parents have the God-given right to bring up their children in the way they see fit?

2. Do you believe that free people have the God-given right to forcefully defend themselves against a tyrannical government?

3. Do you believe that free people have the God-given right to own the means to defend themselves against assault and tyrannical government?

Of course, we all know there is only one Republocrat presidential candidate who would give acceptable answers to all three. I just read that Detroit got some snow today. I think that will work in Paul’s favor, because his supporters are far more passionate about their cause. Six inches of snow isn’t much for Michigan though. Let’s start praying for an outright blizzard–at least twelve inches by 7 pm.

The Lilly White Base

Tuesday, January 15th, 2008

Marc Parent has produced irrefutable evidence that Ron Paul is a raging racist. ;-)

Technorati Tags: ,

Beshalach 5768 – Soldiers, Not Machines

Monday, January 14th, 2008

Exodus 13:17

Lest peradventure the people repent when they see war… Ambition and drive can be good things. Sometimes a direct assault is the best plan, but a husband and father must also think of his family and not drive them faster than they are able to go. Some lessons are very hard to learn and to accept. We must always be moving forward, improving our positions, but sometimes we have to move in a circuitous route or at an easy pace. The only completely unacceptable routes are sitting still or returning to Egypt.

Technorati Tags: , ,