Archive for May, 2008

Cloned VMs Don’t Join Domain

Thursday, May 29th, 2008

If you’re cloning large numbers of virtual machines hosted on ESX servers, and they don’t consistently join the Active Directory domain as they should, go through your Customization Specification and retype the administrative account and domain account passwords. I know it doesn’t make sense, but it worked for me. I cloned hundreds of VMs a few months ago, then had to make a few hundred more this past month. On the second batch, around 50% of my VMs wouldn’t join the domain. I had to log into each one and manually join. After about two dozen of those, I retyped the passwords in my Customization Specification, and then every VM joined correctly and automatically.

VMWare is a great tool, but it’s still pretty flakey.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Subway Apologizes

Thursday, May 29th, 2008

…but doesn’t retract:

To HSLDA [Home School Legal Defense Association]:

We at SUBWAY restaurants place a high value on education, regardless of the setting, and have initiated a number of programs and promotions aimed at educating our youth in the areas of health and fitness.

We sincerely apologize to anyone who feels excluded by our current essay contest. Our intention was to provide an opportunity for traditional schools, many of which we know have trouble affording athletic equipment, to win equipment. Our intent was certainly not to exclude homeschooled children from the opportunity to win prizes and benefit from better access to fitness equipment.

To address the inadvertent limitation of our current contest and provide an opportunity for even more kids to improve their fitness, we will soon create an additional contest in which homeschooled students will be encouraged to participate. When the kids win, everyone wins!

—Subway restaurants

There was a very simple solution to this problem that would have achieved Subway’s goals without excluding anyone, but Subway has chosen the way of “separate, but equal.” That’s their right, of course. Since they only went half-way with this, I’ll only go half-way too. I’ll go to Subway if there’s nothing else around.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Winning the War

Thursday, May 29th, 2008

Jay’s Plan for Winning the “War on Terror”

  1. Forget about Iraq. It has nothing to do with our national security. The invasion was stupid, and continuing a stupid course is just adding stupid to stupid. Define a clear objective, achieve it, and bring the troops home.
  2. Homeschool. Focus on faith, literacy, math, and science. Music and art are nice too, but they shouldn’t be the educational focus for most people.
  3. Stay close to home. Don’t move to the other side of the country after graduation from school, but stay close to your extended family. Strong families make a strong nation.
  4. Have babies. Lots and lots of babies. The race goes not to the swift but to the most prolific breeders. Seriously.
  5. Back off on the meds. God created the world for our use, but medications should be treated like every other potential danger: Moderation in all things. You will be smarter and healthier. Your kids will be smarter and healthier. They will be less tempted to shoot people.
  6. Men be men, and women be women. Men, cover your wives and families and teach your sons to do the same. Women, get under that cover and teach your daughters to do the same. Believe it or not, we will all be happier.
  7. Keep God’s Law. In return, he promises big families, good health, secure borders, military victory, productive land. Really, what else do we need?

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

And Another Thing

Tuesday, May 27th, 2008

Most atheists complain that God isn’t very nice, that he does all kinds of things they find disagreeable. They could never believe in a God who allows such suffering in the world. If he’s really so powerful, why doesn’t he just put an end to all the nastiness?

Then they say that if there really is a being that could will the entire universe into existence, there is no way that mere people, ants that we are, could possibly begin to understand him or communicate with him.

So which is it? Either God should do things we understand or he should behave in ways we find incomprehensible. Atheists refuse to believe in him because they don’t understand why he does what he does, but then they say there’s no way they could ever believe in a God they could understand.

Whatever.

Technorati Tags: ,

O Death, Where Is Thy Sting?

Monday, May 26th, 2008

There’s a discussion re the Why’s of atheism over at Vox Day’s blog. It got me thinking about whether the question of an afterlife has played a significant role in my theism. I don’t think so. Maybe as a child I was scared by thoughts of hell, but I honestly don’t believe in eternal punishment anymore. I just don’t see the evidence for it in Scripture. I’m also not motivated by thoughts of Heaven. Mansions and streets of gold really don’t interest me much.

So why do I believe in God? During the serious crisis of faith that every thoughtful theist experiences at some point, I examined all the info I had at my disposal and decided that God fits the facts better than anything else. All of my reading and experience since then has only strengthened that conviction. Maybe the need for a higher purpose has skewed my judgment. Maybe I’m delusional. But I know I don’t worship the God of Abraham for fear of death or hope of Heaven. I worship him because I believe it is the right thing to do.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

No More Subway

Sunday, May 25th, 2008

There’s a lot of talk online about Subway excluding homeschoolers from their “Every Sandwich Tells a Story” writing contest. Having seen many a similar e-rumor, I thought it would be wise to confirm this one before passing it on.

Here’s the confirmation from subwayfreshbuzz.com:

No home schools

This accomplishes two things for Subway:

  1. It eliminates needless profits. I like going to Subway because it’s relatively healthy fast food. Unfortunately, I won’t be eating there again until they make a well-publicized apology and change the contest rules.
  2. It makes public school students feel better about their inability to spell common English words. Basket, for example.
    Gift Bastket
    This image was captured from Subway’s web site. I didn’t modify it except to crop it shorter.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

B’midbar 5768 – The State vs. The Family

Sunday, May 25th, 2008

Numbers 1:2

…by the house of their fathers… God’s people are organized by families headed by patriarchs, and when left to their own devices, families in agrarian societies will almost always organize themselves into patriarchal clans with or without ever having heard of the God of Abraham. The modern secular state is incompatible with God’s intended form of civil government. Lawrence Stone wrote,

The modern state is a natural enemy to the values of kinship, especially among the upper classes, for kinship is a direct threat to the state’s own claim to prior loyalty. Kinship leads to aristocratic faction and rebellion, such as the War of the Roses or the Fronde, to the independence of entrenched local potentates using kin loyalties to create powerful local connections, and to making the working of the jury system of justice impossible by the subordination of objective judgment to ties of blood. In the sixteenth century, the State in England increasingly assumed monopoly powers of justice and punishment, military protection, welfare, and the regulation of property. This takeover was accompanied by a massive propaganda campaign for loyalty, inculcating the view that the first duty of every citizen is obedience to the sovereign, that man’s highest obligation is to his country, involving the subordination of all other considerations and loyalties, even life itself.1

Although Stone is demonstrably incorrect concerning the jury system, his observations on the tendency of the state to subvert kinship ties is not. The Assyrians regularly deported entire nations in order to uproot them from their ancestral homes and break the alliances of blood. The same phenomenon was observed in the relocation programs of the Soviets in the twentieth century and of the Americans in the nineteenth. Tying such things as military commands to patriarchal clans tends to discourage the military adventurism of conquest and world policing and the centralization of power into the hands of a small political elite.

1 Lawrence Stone. “The Rise of the Nuclear Family in Early Modern England: The Patriarchal Stage”, The Family in History, Ed. Charles E. Rosenberg. Philadelphia: 1975. 24

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Go Machida!

Sunday, May 25th, 2008

Way to go, Machida! Good show. It was really nice to see a different style do well in the Octagon.

Update: Check out this video of career highlights at Youtube. Machida doesn’t look very fast or strong, but neither does a planet until you get in its way. His opponents seem to have a way of putting their faces right where his fist is about to be, and he hits hard. I almost couldn’t believe the way Ortiz went down from that knee to the ribs. His take down defense is great too. He needs to work on his grappling, though. If Oritz hadn’t already been hurt by the knee, there’s no way Machida would have escaped that arm bar.

Does a Husband Own His Wife?

Saturday, May 24th, 2008

Webster’s 1828.

Authority. 1. Legal power, or a right to command or to act; as the authority of a prince over subjects, and of parents over children. Power; rule; sway.

Property. 4. The exclusive right of possessing, enjoying and disposing of a thing; ownership. In the beginning of the world, the Creator gave to man dominion over the earth, over the fish of the sea and the fowls of the air, and over every living thing. This is the foundation of man’s property in the earth and in all its productions. Prior occupancy of land and of wild animals gives to the possessor the property of them. The labor of inventing, making or producing any thing constitutes one of the highest and most indefeasible titles to property. Property is also acquired by inheritance, by gift or by purchase. Property is sometimes held in common, yet each man’s right to his share in common land or stock is exclusively his own. One man may have the property of the soil,and another the right of use, by prescription or by purchase.

“No man can serve two masters.”

“Ownership” and “authority” are near synonyms. Authority is the right to use or dispose of something. Every single authority relationship is also one of property ownership. My employer owns a certain amount of my time in exchange for modest pay and benefits. I have granted them some authority over me for certain purposes. Every parent has some ownership of their children. Every husband has some ownership of his wife.

Note that I did not say ownership is the absolute right to do whatever you want with something. No authority but God’s is absolute. Therefore, no property interest but God’s is absolute. The Bible is very clear that if you abuse the things God has given you, he will take them away. That includes land, objects, people, and nations. All people have God-given rights and responsibilities. Like King George (whichever one you care to name), if you try to deny them, you forfeit your authority.

So when people, who otherwise accept the Bible’s teachings concerning a husband’s authority over his wife, get upset about a husband owning his wife, they’re actually conceding the point to the opposition. If a husband has no property interest in his wife, then he has no authority over her either. Otherwise the concept of “property” has no real meaning. There is no shame in being under authority. Everyone is under someone else’s authority in some way.

If you don’t accept the Bible’s teachings on patriarchy, then that’s another argument altogether. It still doesn’t change the definitions of property or authority.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Piercings

Friday, May 23rd, 2008

Ladies, in case you care, pierced cheeks, lips, eyebrows, and nose bridges are not attractive. In fact, they are repulsive. Ears, nose, even belly-button piercings can be nice, just not the rest of that stuff. It makes you look like you are trying hard to be ugly.