Archive for April, 2009

I’ll Take That Texas

Thursday, April 30th, 2009

I always enjoyed my visits to Texas because of how friendly everyone was. Everyone smiles, says hello, and is very polite. Then I moved here and relearned that people everywhere are rude, conniving, and generally unpleasant.

This morning on my way into town I noticed a stray cow–a big Texas longhorn–that was standing on the shoulder of the highway with cars passing by at 70 to 80 mph. Sensing disaster not too far in the future, I grabbed my phone to call the police. Before I could flip the phone open, I remembered Deuteronomy 22:1-4.

(1) You shall not see your brother’s ox or his sheep go astray and hide yourself from them. You shall surely bring them again to your brother.  (2)  And if your brother is not near you, or if you do not know him [i.e. do not know to whom the animal belongs], then you shall bring it into your own house, and it shall be with you until your brother seeks after it, and you shall give it back to him again.  (3)  In the same way you shall do with his ass. And so shall you do with his clothing. And with any lost thing of your brother’s, which he has lost and you have found, you shall do the same. You may not hide yourself.  (4)  You shall not see your brother’s ass or his ox fall down by the way, and hide yourself from them. You shall surely help him to lift it up again.

It’s not the police’s job to return lost animals. It’s mine.

I could see where the cow had broken through the fence, so I knew which ranch it was. I drove through the gate and kept driving until I found a house. The rancher, Dan, was awake, of course, but wasn’t exactly expecting company and spilled coffee all over the floor when I knocked. I told him about the cow and asked if he needed help. Dan accepted the offer, and we drove around to the highway in his truck. When we arrived, a patrol car was there and officer Brad was attempting to keep ole Bessie away from the road. The three of us successfully chased her back across the fence. (Have you ever seen a cow jump!?) After introductions and a suitable few minutes of small talk, the policeman left the scene of the crime, and the rancher asked me to stand there and make sure the cow didn’t jump the fence again while he retrieved the materials to repair that section.

Longhorns are big, sturdy animals, and although they might seem like the bisons’ retarded cousins, this one was no stranger to scheming. It stood there for at least five minutes staring me down, inching closer to the fence, as if daring me to stop her. And really, if she decided to jump, what was I going to do? Those horns are sharp, and they’re attached to a whole lot of steak. The fence was weighed down with years worth of vine growth, and when I climbed on top of the pile and put my hands on my hips, she finally backed down and walked away.

Dan arrived a few minutes later with a fence panel and a roll of barbed wire, and we got to closing the gap. Just then a man named Scotty, driving a large, black F250, pulls over and asks if we need help. It turns out he’s a vice president at a local bank and knows who to call to get some workers. He said he could have someone there in thirty minutes, but Dan told him we’d have it done by then. (It actually took a little over an hour more to clear out the underbrush enough to get the new panel in, but who’s counting?) Then another car pulls over. An elderly woman wearing pink and carrying an umbrella asked Scotty if he was having car trouble. She started a bit when she spotted Dan and I over in the weeds. Seeing that everything was under control, she wished everyone a good day and both she and Scotty went about their respective businesses.

When everything was done, Dan’s arms were bleeding from a dozen small wounds caused by thorns and barbs, but he invited me to join him for lunch anyway. He introduced me to his dogs and herd of donkeys at the house, then he cleaned up before we went out for cheeseburgers. (He wanted steak, probably just as a guesture of goodwill toward Bessie the bullheaded cow, but his favorite steakhouse wasn’t open.) We chatted about the ranching and computer businesses over lunch, and Dan told me I should be sure to visit Scotty at his office. “He’s a good man to know around here.” He said the locals can be a very tight-knit community, and Scotty knows everybody. He also told me about how well they all look out for each other.

When I first decided to find that cow’s owner, I was a little irritated at the animal for disrupting my schedule, but I’m glad she did. It was a very pleasant morning, even if I did have to change my clothes and take another shower. Brad and Dan and Scotty and the unknown Good Samaritan lady restored my faith in Texas. There are two worlds here just like everywhere else. There’s the world of McDonalds and Walmart where people don’t know each other and don’t want to. Then there’s the world of communities and neighbors looking out for each other.

I’ll take that second Texas. China probably owns the other one anyway.

Acharei Mot 5769 – Rank Hath It’s Prerequisites

Tuesday, April 28th, 2009

Leviticus 16:4

…therefore shall he wash his flesh in water, and so put them on. A priest must wash himself before donning his robes. On the surface, this is about respect for his office and the holy things of God. At a slightly deeper level, this is about the character of a good leader. As Paul wrote to Timothy, “Lay hands suddenly on no man.” Before annointing a leader, make sure that he won’t soil the mantle of his office.

Leaden Wings

Monday, April 27th, 2009

Two birds called across a raucous wood so lonely.
They sang awhile and wondered at the distance.

“Why do none nearby sing like you so lovely?”
Cried the one to the other across the miles.

“They all want to be something else than what
They were meant to be,” whistled her reply.

“This space between us really must be cut.
I’ll come to you this time, then we’ll trade.”

“That’s fair, I think. It’s nice to find a bird
Who loves the old hymns and sings them out so well.”

So when the time was good, the whole woods heard
A new duet, two voices in just one place for a time.
But alas work on nests recalled at the end of day.
Time went by and the little birds sang and played
To each other about their work, the hunts for hay
And seed and friends among the crows and owls.
The hen flew next, to see how lived the first
Among the wings and leaves of that other world.

“You are alone in grace and beauty,” he versed.
“Stay here with me. We’ll sing and fly together.”

She considered, but knew the truth already.
“I’d miss my friends and home by the springs.
It’s lonely here and the air is so unsteady.”

“Then I’m determined to come to you,” he sang.
“There’s no song like yours among these leaves.
Nothing to keep me here and besides we’re done
With half our days. Why live alone like thieves?”

“‘Tis natural now that we are more than friends
And I’d like it more if you were with me here.”

He left the dry north slopes to build a nest
In the branches near the water and his dear.
They sang and played and danced all spring.

Finally he said, “I think it’s coming time to make
This change for real. Come now and perch with me.
You and I are a perfect match to satisfy this ache.”

She cocked her head to one side and said, “I’m not sure
That this is right. I love you, but we’ll never be one.”

“I don’t understand,” he cried. “After all this time,
Why do you now say no to what seemed done?”

She sighed and shrugged her wings. “There’s just too much
That’s so very different between you and me.
Your plumage is too gray and your song too soft.
When you fly you ascend at all the wrong degree.
We don’t sing in perfect harmony like we should.
I love you, and I’m sorry, but this will never effect.”

He could naught but grip his branch and croon his pain.

“I must go, but tell me first if you hate or reject
As our friendship means more to me than you can know.”

The light now gone from his eyes, but loving still
He said, “How can I hate the heart within my breast
Even so broken and full of pain distilled?”

A Messianic Study on Romans

Friday, April 24th, 2009

There is a great series on Romans here.

Quinn’s Ishmael

Friday, April 24th, 2009

In his book Ishmael, Daniel Quinn posited two competing stories which are being enacted by all the civilizations of the world: the Takers and the Leavers. The human race began by telling only one story in which mankind was but one species among millions competing for finite resources. They did not see themselves as masters of the world, but one element of it on a par with every other creature. Mankind was no better or worse, no more or less deserving of food and space than wolves or sparrows or sea bass. They lived at the mercy of seasons and solar cycles, happy to accept life or death as the world decreed. Around 8000 years ago something changed dramatically. One tribe among the thousands that then lived on earth decided that they would no longer live by the benevolence of nature, but by their own power to manipulate their conditions to better suit their own desires. They beat back the forest and plowed the land under, planting what they wanted to eat right where they lived rather than having to search it out. They stored the excess of the years of plenty to stave off starvation in the years of famine. As a result, they circumvented the historic cycles of population expansion and contraction, and their numbers grew. So did their need for resources. They pushed back the forest a little further, plowed under a little more earth, and grew a little more food than they needed to feed their greater numbers and thereby enabling yet more growth.

The revolutionary new story that upset the age old pattern told of how mankind was something more than his natural competitors. It told him that he must not continue behaving as the property of the world, but as its owner instead. So he began to treat all resources around him—animal, plant, mineral, and often even people—as his property to use however suited him. To protect his food supply he waged war on his neighbors, hunted down predators, burned down forests, and eventually poisoned his own crops to kill anything that might take them from him. This agricultural revolution spread around the globe, across every continent, and eventually nearly wiping out all traces of the hunter-gatherer peoples who came before. Quinn called the tribes who adopted this new story “the Takers” and those who remained in the older story “the Leavers.”

The Takers’ story must eventually lead to the consumption of so many resources that they will be unable to continue telling it. It relies on unrelenting expansion at the expense of the rest of the world, and there is no possible ending but catastrophe. The Takers cannot see this, of course, and rush ever faster to their own doom, trying to save their future by continually undermining it.

The Leavers, on the other hand, live in such a way that their impact on the rest of the world is minimal. The cost, however, is high. Despite Quinn’s assertions in Ishmael, the lives of stone-age tribes are every bit as miserable as those of their city-dwelling counterparts. The causes of their miseries are simply different. They still wage war against neighboring tribes and predators. They frequently hunt their prey to extinction as far as they are able. They suffer injury and disease with little or no recourse. They might be happy much of the time, perhaps more than the Takers, but their lives are far from Edenic.

Quinn contended that the solution to the Takers’ dilemma is to find a way to lead our civilization into the Leavers’ story, to invent a code of living that allows computer users to become hunter-gatherers over time. His arguments are compelling. Quinn frequently anticipated my objections to many of his points, asking and answering the very same questions I had in mind. Many of his observations were profound, but I frequently felt frustrated that he came so close to the truth on so many points, but still fell short.

In the end I found his proposed solution unsatisfactory. I see no reason at all why I should abandon one hopeless way of life only to adopt another. Yet it still seems that we must abandon many of our current ways. If we do not make some fundamental changes we might find ourselves becoming Leavers whether we want to or not as the world rebels against our perennial abuses. The gods will eventually put a stop to our Tower of Babel and scatter us back to the stone age without power tools or insecticides or cell phones.

Fortunately, there are other alternatives. There are at least four stories that could be told by mankind. The Takers’ story is one of ownership, in which mankind owns the world outright and may do with it whatever he pleases. The Takers live in a state of self-focused materialism. The Leavers’ story is also one of ownership, but in reverse so that mankind is owned by the world and must submit to whatever it decrees. It is a backwards looking fatalism. Many environmentalists would have us tell a third story of transience, in which mankind is a guest on the earth and should seek to have as little impact as possible.

The Torah tells a different kind of story, one of stewardship, in which mankind is God’s gardener set in the Garden of Earth not to conquer and pillage, but to govern on behalf of the King. We are neither the owners of the earth nor its property, but we are very definitely meant to live here. Everything we have, weather it be real estate, animals, tools, or family, is only delegated to us, and God will someday hold each of us responsible for how we used his possessions. We may derive our sustenance from our charge, but we may never abuse it.

Hey! That’s me!

Wednesday, April 22nd, 2009

A Commentary on Marriage in the Bible, Volume 1: the TorahMy first book is now available for purchase! You can get it in trade paperback, PDF, PalmPilot, Microsoft Reader, or Kindle formats. Go here and order ten. Right now.

I mean it.

Now.

Tazria 5769 – Born to Fail

Wednesday, April 22nd, 2009

Leviticus 12:3
And in the eighth day the flesh of his foreskin shall be circumcised.

No human being, including Yeshua, has ever been born complete.

When God created the world, he said it was good. It was perfect, but not in the way you might think. Perfection can imply an untouchable, changeless quality, but the world was meant to change. Adam was put in the Garden not only to care for it, but to subdue it, to change it.

Mankind too was created imperfect by design. We are flawed, physically, emotionally, spiritually, and that’s exactly the way that God intended us to be. However, he did not intend for us to remain in that state. On the eighth day of his new life, a baby boy begins his transformation into what the man he is to become, and his initiation is accomplished through pain inflicted by the hand of another man. Again, by design.

We are born in pain and grow to maturity through pain. Without it, we would live and die in infancy, never knowing who God intended for us to become. Without experiencing the sorrow of death and separation, we can never experience the full measure of life.

When God or man bars the way with trial, don’t waste time lamenting the fact, but consider how this barrier can be overcome, like the last one, and the one before that, and the one still to come. With each victory gained through struggle over suffering, you will be one step closer to the perfection that God intended you to achieve.

Transferring DNS Registration

Wednesday, April 15th, 2009

Hopefully I won’t be down for too long while DNS records are updated. It shouldn’t be more than a day or two.

Shmini 5769 – Eat Up!

Tuesday, April 14th, 2009

Leviticus 11 lists the basic rules of kashrut:

  1. Land animals that are cloven-hoofed and chew the cud are food. Any animal with one and not the other is not food.
  2. Water animals that have fins and scales are food. Anything in the water with one and not the other is not food.
  3. Birds of prey or carrion are not food.
  4. Certain other birds are not food, but due to translation uncertainties and a lack of defining characteristics in Torah, we have no way besides inference and tradition to tell us about birds that aren’t mentioned. (Here’s an interesting article: http://www.star-k.org/cons-keep-basics-birds.htm Living the Law: Reinforcing the Tradition with a Palpable Precedent by Rabbi Ari Z. Zivotofsky and Dr. Ari Greenspan.)
  5. Insects are not food except for four types of bugs that have over-sized rear legs for jumping.
  6. Anything that walks on paws or slithers on its belly is not food.

That leaves most ruminants, most fish, and many birds as suitable material for stew, salad, or stir-fry. No reptiles, amphibians, or shellfish allowed.

There are six common objections to a Christian or Messianic Jew to keeping kosher:

  1. Those rules were just because they didn’t have refrigeration. Now we know about tape worms and trichinosis and we keep everything frozen or at least cold before we cook it. Beef spoils if left unrefrigerated for too long, and chicken is dangerous if not cooked properly. Both are kosher. I’m sure you can see where I’m going with that.
  2. Jesus made all foods clean. We don’t have to obey those laws anymore. Actually, Jesus never said anything of the sort. When debating the Pharisees about whether or not it is acceptable to eat food with unwashed hands when that food would otherwise be perfectly kosher, he told them that they were so concerned about their own traditions that they were ignoring God’s actual laws. His central point was this: What difference does it make if a man eats with dirty hands (or eats pork or lobster!) if he is a murderer, a liar, or an adulterer? If you put something into your mouth, your body eventually purges it. If you put something into your heart, however, there is no automatic, natural process to remove it.
  3. That was only for the Dispensation of Law. God told Noah he could eat any animal. That changed when God gave the law at Mt. Sinai, then it changed again when Jesus rose from the grave. Now we are in the Dispensation of Grace and can ignore the Law of Moses. Moses wrote in Deuteronomy 12:20 that the Israelites could eat whatever meat they wanted, but just 2 chapters later he repeated the list of things that God didn’t want them to eat. Moses told us that Noah definitely knew which animals were kosher and which weren’t. Why did God tell him to take 7 clean animals and only 2 unclean?. Some were for sacrifices, but not all of them. They were almost certainly for food. Why didn’t he just send 4 of everything for variety’s sake? God told Noah “Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things.” Perhaps he was using a figure of speech just as he did in Deuteronomy 12:20, and a hyperliteral interpretation is inappropriate. Instead, it should be understood to mean, “Now you can even eat living things that move, just like you can eat plants.”
  4. Those are ceremonial laws. They don’t apply to us anymore. Only the moral laws are still in effect. I have never yet seen a reasonable defense of such a distinction in the Law. It’s an invention of man. To the contrary, God said, “Do not take anything away from my laws nor add anything to them.” On one side are hazy conjectures and complicated theories. On the other side are several very clear, unambiguous statements from God. I’ll go with the latter.
  5. All of the Law of Moses was abolished. It was entirely replaced with a new set of morals defined by Jesus and fleshed out by Paul: Love God with everything you’ve got, and love your neighbor as yourself. When Jesus was asked what is the greatest commandment, he quoted the Torah, and he said that all of the rest of God’s words hang on just two commandments. He didn’t say that the rest of Torah was no longer relevant. He didn’t add or subtract anything at all from the Torah. He didn’t even say anything new, although it might have been new to the Pharisees with their burdensome traditions:

    Matthew 22:37-40  Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.

    Here are the originals:

    Deuteronomy 6:4-5  Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD: And thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might.

    Leviticus 19:18 Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.

    Here’s something else Jesus said about the Law of Moses:

    Matthew 5:17-19  Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.  Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.

    Note two things about that statement: 1) Whatever “fulfil” means here, it does not mean to destroy. 2) All will not be fulfilled until heaven and earth pass.

  6. The Law of Moses is still valid and still applies, but only to Jews. It was never intended to apply to gentile Christians. As far as salvation is concerned, “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.” The New Covenant was not promised to the nations, to gentiles. It was promised only to the houses of Israel and Judah. “The Gentiles have been made partakers of their spiritual things” and have been grafted into the tree of Israel, not the other way around. There is only one body in the Messiah, one nation, and one law.

[Edited to correct a few word errors and to add a sixth argument.]

Tea Party

Tuesday, April 14th, 2009

I just returned from a local Republican Pep Rally Tea Party. If you’ve been holding your breath, you can stop now. My cynicism regarding American politics has been confirmed.

Can you just imagine Samuel Cooper and Paul Revere buying their own tea, neatly packaging it up, and politely mailing it back to King George? And then slapping each other on the back over how well that grand war went over there in Bengal? You know, the one that precipitated the starvation of ten to fifteen millions of people in a country that was no threat to anything but a few well-padded pocketbooks back in the Homeland?

Michael McCaul showed up to give a rousing (not) speech. He’s my hero…or something. :-/  Well, at least he’s not the worst of them. (I had a momentary vision of standing in the midst of a hundred head of cattle, gutted, skinned, and hung up to age, then made to cheer and smack their hooves together on cue.)

The highlight of the event was one local patriot who, holding a Gadsden flag, proclaimed that we decent people should never have to be afraid of our own government, but they had better be afraid of us. (Let’s send that guy to Washington instead of McCaul!)

Then everyone politely returned to their vehicles and made their orderly ways back to their homes and offices. Can’t you just hear the air whistling out of liberty’s tires?