Archive for the ‘Books’ Category

Waging of War

Wednesday, December 3rd, 2008

Someone didn’t do their homework.

Waging of War 

In war, victory should be swift. If victory is slow, men tire, morale sags. Sieges exhaust strength; protracted campaigns strain the public treasury….

No nation has ever benefited from a protracted war….

The skillful warrior never conscripts troops a second time…

Supplying an army at a distance drains the public coffers and impoverishes the common people….

Strength is depleted on the battlefield; families at home are destitute….

In war, prize victory, not a protracted campaign.

From The Art of War by Sun Tzu, translated by John Minford, c 2002.

Devarim Is Off!

Tuesday, October 28th, 2008

I just emailed Devarim to my editor-in-conscript. I’m sure I will have to make some adjustments to the manuscript, but that concludes the major work on the Torah! I am now on to the Writings & the Prophets, aka Neviim and Ketuvim.

In the spirit of the occassion, I offer you Harry’s First Dream:

Spengler on Sharansky

Monday, October 20th, 2008

No, that’s not a fancy new name for chipped beef on toast. It’s Spengler’s review of Natan Sharansky’s book Defending Identity. I haven’t read the book and probably won’t, but I thought this was worth repeating:

Eliminating all passionate attachments, Sharansky might have said, is a fool’s errand. A rabbinic tale of antiquity reports what happened when God decided to eliminate the ”evil impulse”, by which the rabbis meant the competitive and sexual instinct among men. The next day not a single egg was laid in the land of Israel, and God was obliged to restore the impulse. Europe may have succeeded in eliminating nationalism, or rather, nationalism burnt itself out in two hideously destructive World Wars. As a result children no longer are born to the Europeans. The problem is self-liquidating.

On the other hand, the two countries considered most suspect for their nationalism by the supposedly enlightened Europeans, the United States and Israel, are the only ones in the entire industrial world to reproduce at above replacement level.

There’s more good stuff, too, but it wouldn’t be polite to reproduce the entire thing here.

By the Numbers

Sunday, September 21st, 2008

B’midbar is in the mail to my editor. And only three months late, too! At this rate, I’ll be done before the end of the century.

Leadership in the Ron Paul Tribe

Friday, August 15th, 2008

G.L. Hoffman points out that Ron Paul’s leadership is successful because of three factors:

  1. “Find an enemy.” I.e. external focus.
  2. “Make a movement.” I.e. have a transcendent cause.
  3. “Talk that way.” I.e. speak of we and success as if it’s already a done deal.

It sounds to me like Ron Paul is working straight out of the Tribal Leadership playbook. I’ve read that book 3 times so far this year. One of these days it’s going to start sinking in.

B’midbar 5768 – The State vs. The Family

Sunday, May 25th, 2008

Numbers 1:2

…by the house of their fathers… God’s people are organized by families headed by patriarchs, and when left to their own devices, families in agrarian societies will almost always organize themselves into patriarchal clans with or without ever having heard of the God of Abraham. The modern secular state is incompatible with God’s intended form of civil government. Lawrence Stone wrote,

The modern state is a natural enemy to the values of kinship, especially among the upper classes, for kinship is a direct threat to the state’s own claim to prior loyalty. Kinship leads to aristocratic faction and rebellion, such as the War of the Roses or the Fronde, to the independence of entrenched local potentates using kin loyalties to create powerful local connections, and to making the working of the jury system of justice impossible by the subordination of objective judgment to ties of blood. In the sixteenth century, the State in England increasingly assumed monopoly powers of justice and punishment, military protection, welfare, and the regulation of property. This takeover was accompanied by a massive propaganda campaign for loyalty, inculcating the view that the first duty of every citizen is obedience to the sovereign, that man’s highest obligation is to his country, involving the subordination of all other considerations and loyalties, even life itself.1

Although Stone is demonstrably incorrect concerning the jury system, his observations on the tendency of the state to subvert kinship ties is not. The Assyrians regularly deported entire nations in order to uproot them from their ancestral homes and break the alliances of blood. The same phenomenon was observed in the relocation programs of the Soviets in the twentieth century and of the Americans in the nineteenth. Tying such things as military commands to patriarchal clans tends to discourage the military adventurism of conquest and world policing and the centralization of power into the hands of a small political elite.

1 Lawrence Stone. “The Rise of the Nuclear Family in Early Modern England: The Patriarchal Stage”, The Family in History, Ed. Charles E. Rosenberg. Philadelphia: 1975. 24

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Patriarchy

Tuesday, May 20th, 2008

In the prologue to Marriage, East and West, David and Vera Mace wrote:

From the Fertile Crescent…to the rocky eastern shores of Nippon…the patriarchal family reigns supreme. For full four thousand years of recorded history it has held undisputed sway. The odd and fascinating family patterns of some island peoples and hill tribes–polyandry, matrilineal descent, matrilocal marriage, and the like–have captivated the anthropologists. But these are, by comparison with the patriarchal family system, of little account in the great stream of human culture…The hereditary pattern that has dominated the human family, that has been passed down through countless generations, in East and West alike, is solidly, unvaryingly patriarchal.1

Their conclusion was most soundly reinforced by Stephen Goldberg throughout The Inevitability of Patriarchy. He went a step further than the Maces, however, by asserting that those few exceptions are either too unstable to last more than a few generations or else they are illusions, actual patriarchies behind a few token elements of matriarchy.2

1 David and Vera Mace. Marriage, East and West. Garden City, NY: Dolphin Books, 1960. 29
2 Stephen Goldberg. The Inevitability of Patriarchy. New York: William Morrow & Company, Inc., 1974.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Final Draft of Vayikra

Friday, May 16th, 2008

I just sent the final draft of Vayikra to my editor. It’s moving slowly, but it is definitely moving! Vayikra is relatively short, only 30 pages. By way of comparison, Bereishit is 99 pages. Most of the foundational material is in Bereishit, so it makes sense that it would be the single largest section.

I know it sounds crazy that it should take so long to pump out just 30 pages, but this isn’t light work. It can take hours–sometimes even days–to write a single paragraph. I have no formal training in theology. I don’t know any ancient languages. What I have instead is a mission, even an anointing, I believe. Although I would like to learn Hebrew and a little Greek, I think my lack of indoctrination is an advantage. I have access to the opinions and works of dozens of great scholars, I have a pretty good head on my shoulders, and a willingness to write what God tells me. I am certain that I frequently get in the way of accurately hearing God’s voice, but I am determined to not let my prejudices dictate my words, to keep my heart open to the Spirit’s prompting. Whether or not I succeed in the end will be for God alone to judge because, as I’ve said before, men will hate what I have to say.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Commentary on Scriptural Marriage

Thursday, March 20th, 2008

The book will be in eight parts: seven sections of commentary on the canonical scriptures and an appendix including a review of some ancient Jewish and Christian writings, a cross-reference, and other odds and ends.  

  1. Bereishit (Genesis)
  2. Sh’mot (Exodus)
  3. Vayikra (Leviticus)
  4. B’midbar (Numbers)
  5. Devarim (Deuteronomy)
  6. Nevi’im and Ketuvim (Writings and Prophets)
  7. Brit Chadasha (New Testament)
  8. Appendices

I have been working on this for more than ten years now, and I am finally beginning to see the end on the horizon.Parts 1 and 2 are with the editor, although part 1 will need some more work, I think. The rough drafts are complete for parts 3-5 and 7. Part 6 is pretty spotty right now. Part 8 is still mostly conceptual. I spent of that time reading, discussing, arguing, and contemplating. All of that was fun and worthwhile, but each stage became an end in itself and threatened to derail the whole project. A friend reminded me that nothing is ever perfect, and sometimes you just have to settle for “good enough.” So I am trying to focus on the hard work now: the writing, reviewing, writing, correcting, writing, correlating, writing, and re-writing.

I suspect that I might miss this project when it’s done, but I also suspect that it will never truly be done. It will always be growing and evolving in my mind even long after it has been printed, bound, and torn to shreds by the billions of people who will hate it.

Everyone will hate something about it. Even me.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Pax Americana Belliger per Deus

Friday, November 30th, 2007

Robert Silverberg’s Roma Eterna is a collection of stories in an alternate history in which Rome never succumbed to the corrupting forces of decadence nor to barbarian hordes. It’s mostly a good book, but there are some very dull spots.

The primary point of divergence was 3500 years ago at the time of the Hebrew Exodus from Egypt. Instead of crossing the Red Sea, the Israelites were driven into it by Pharaoh, drowning 10,000 of them and dooming the remnant to remain in Egypt. Of course, in reality, there probably never would have been a Roman Empire if the Israelites had not conquered Canaan. The kingdoms of Israel and Judah were much more powerful than most of the individual Canaanite kingdoms they replaced. They served as a stablizing influence in the region and very likely set in motion a series of migrations that sparked the development of both the Greek and Roman peoples into true nations.

Despite that historical problem, Silverberg’s characters still tell a few significant truths:

Democracy in Iraq?

While discussing the possibility of bringing Arabia into the Empire, Nicomedes says, “…these Saracens are free men, free within themselves, which is a kind of freedom that you and I are simply not equipped to comprehend. They can’t be conquered because they can’t be governed. Trying to conquer them is like trying to conquer lions or tigers. You can whip a lion or even kill it, yes, but you can’t possibly impose your will on it even if you keep it in a cage for twenty years. These are a race of lions here. Government as we understand it is a concept that can never exist here.”

Nicomedes was wrong about the freedom of the Saracens, but he was right about the possibility of governing them. God said they would always be at war with their neighbors, and so that’s they way it will be. Attempting to bring democracy to Ishmael’s descendants is worse than a fool’s errand. It’s rebellion against God. Do we really think we can bring peace where God said there can be no peace?

Gen 16:11  And the angel of the LORD said unto [Haggar], Behold, thou art with child, and shalt bear a son, and shalt call his name Ishmael; because the LORD hath heard thy affliction.
Gen 16:12  And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man’s hand against him…

The Lowest Common Denominator

Later, a Roman in exile became a friend of Muhammad in the days before he had fully embraced his mission of Islam. He said to Muhammad, “We Romans are accustomed to regarding all creeds with tolerance, and if you ever visit our capital you will find temples of a hundred faiths standing side by side. But I do see the beauty of your teachings.”

Muhammad replied, “Beauty? I asked about truth. When you say you accept all faiths as equally true, what you are really saying is that you see no truth in any of them…” And he was absolutely correct. It borders on insanity to say that Hinduism and Voodoo are of equal truth with Christianity or Judaism. Most of the great religions are totally incompatible with each other. Either you believe Yeshua’s words or you believe Muhammad’s. If you say you believe them both, what you are actually saying is that you believe neither, and you make yourself look like a complete ignoramus.

Technorati Tags: , , ,