Archive for the ‘Marriage’ Category

Permission to Sin?

Thursday, December 3rd, 2009

I frequently hear people say that God allowed this or that sinful behavior because people are weak.

Buzzzz. Try again.

God does not allow sin. He never says, “Don’t ever do this, but if you do, here’s how I want you to go about it…” He just says, “Don’t do that.”

So, if, in the course of your Bible reading, you see that God said, “If you are going to [insert activity here], then do it like this,” you can safely conclude that the given activity is not sinful. It might not be the best thing for you, but it’s not a sin to make choices where God has given you liberty.

Marriage in the Bible

On Kathryn Kuhlman

Tuesday, December 1st, 2009

I disagree with one thing Pastor Mark said in the podcast I linked to in my last post. Kathryn Kuhlman’s decision to remain unmarried should not be considered a pattern for other women to follow. She married a man who apparently left his wife for her, and when that marriage ended in disaster, she concluded that marriage would only interfere with her ministry. She was wrong. She made a mistake and learned the wrong lesson from it.

There might be extraordinary circumstances in which God doesn’t want a particular woman to marry. There is no specific command in scripture that all women must marry, so I’m not going to say otherwise. However, I will say that the universal scriptural example is that a woman should marry, and if she has a ministry independent of her husband’s then it must be conducted within the context of her primary roles as wife and mother. See, for example, Deborah, who was not simply Deborah, a prophetess, but “Deborah, a prophetess, the wife of Lapidoth”. (Judges 4:4)

Mark McLellan on the Roles of Men and Women

Sunday, November 29th, 2009

Pastor Mark has another great podcast, this one on the respective roles and responsibilities of men and women in marriage. Listen to his last sermon at http://graftedin.com. Seriously. Listen.

Marriage in the Bible

Vayetzei 5770 – Who’s Eyes Were Veiled?

Tuesday, November 24th, 2009

Genesis 29:23 …he took Leah his daughter…

It appears that this maneuver was Laban’s idea, but Jewish tradition says that Rachel and Leah willingly cooperated. Jacob and Rachel had devised a secret sign for just this situation, so that Jacob would not be fooled. Rachel, knowing that Leah might never be able to marry and have a family, had compassion on her and revealed the secret sign to her. Even so, it seems difficult to believe that Jacob could make such a mistake, especially after having lived with both of these women for seven years. But there are several other factors to consider:

  1. There was almost certainly a substantial amount of alcohol consumed during the celebrations.
  2. Rachel and Leah probably both wore veils, even in public, and which they might not have removed even on their wedding night until after the last lamp had been put out.
  3. The interior of an animal skin tent at night can be exceptionally dark.
  4. Jewish tradition says that Rachel and Leah were twins and so could have been very similar in height, weight, and build.
  5. God had promised to look after Jacob until he returned to Canaan, and Jacob’s blindness could have been induced by God to ensure the execution of a divine plan.

In support of the fourth and fifth items above, there is another tradition that says Esau should have married Leah while Jacob should have married Rachel. Since Jacob received Esau’s blessing from Isaac, he also had to be the father of all twelve of the tribes of Israel. Leah, Rachel, Bilhah, and Zilpah had been marked as the mothers of the nation of Israel, and no other woman would do. Therefore Jacob had to marry all four of them, and God made sure that it happened. But why did Rachel and Leah go along with this idea? I have heard some women say that they would rather be the third or fourth wife of King David than the first wife of Nabal. The rabbis say that Jacob married so late in life because he had been studying under Shem, the son of Noah. I do not know if that is true, but it would certainly make Jacob a more attractive prospect than most other men. Having spent the last seven years in such close proximity to Jacob, Leah might have already harbored a strong attraction to him. She was also a godly woman and probably very respectful of her father’s wishes, however conniving he might be.

Rachel was more likely than Leah to find another husband if Jacob rejected her and could have felt some compassion toward her sister in her unfortunate situation. She was also a godly woman and probably experienced a great deal of conflict in her loyalties, as she was not yet fully married to Jacob.

Reality Check

Wednesday, October 21st, 2009

The University of Montreal tells us that women are better at identifying emotional responses than men. My first reaction was, “And someone thought we needed a study to figure that out?” But then I remembered that this is a university. Yes, they needed a study to remind them girls and boys really are different even on the inside.

Side note: Evolutionary psychology is almost as big a waste of time and money as xenobiology. Almost.

Parents Know

Tuesday, October 13th, 2009

They might get some of the details wrong, but when it comes to your essential character, your parents will always know you better than you will ever know yourself.

Life Doesn’t Get Easier

Tuesday, September 22nd, 2009

Why doesn’t life get easier with practice?

Because life is not lived for its own sake. It is preparation for something greater. When a man trains his body, he does not do so only to make his training easier. He trains in preparation for some contest. When a bodybuilding contestant can easily lift 100 lbs, it would do him little good to continue with the same exercise, weight, and repetitions. If he is to improve his strength, he increases the weight or the reps or both. He works another muscle group. When life gets harder every year, don’t despair. Instead, bear up and realize that the harder you train now, the greater the contest and the prize that God has in store for you later.

Ki Tetzei 5769 – Love Her or Leave Her Alone

Tuesday, September 1st, 2009

Late again. Sorry.

Deuteronomy 21:10-14 When thou goest forth to war against thine enemies, and the LORD thy God hath delivered them into thine hands, and thou hast taken them captive, (11) And seest among the captives a beautiful woman, and hast a desire unto her, that thou wouldest have her to thy wife; (12) Then thou shalt bring her home to thine house; and she shall shave her head, and pare her nails; (13) And she shall put the raiment of her captivity from off her, and shall remain in thine house, and bewail her father and her mother a full month: and after that thou shalt go in unto her, and be her husband, and she shall be thy wife. (14) And it shall be, if thou have no delight in her, then thou shalt let her go whither she will; but thou shalt not sell her at all for money, thou shalt not make merchandise of her, because thou hast humbled her.

The practice of taking captive women as concubines has long been frowned upon in western cultures, and for good reason. As with marrying more than one woman, marrying a prisoner of war is a complicated and difficult proposition. A man of weak character can’t pull it off, and a man of poor character can’t do it well. On the other hand, difficult doesn’t mean sinful or impossible. In fact, in the context of the ancient near east–probably in other contexts as well–marriage was one of the best options available. It is better than killing her with the rest of her people or leaving her to be abused or enslaved by some other nation. At least as a concubine to an Israelite, she would be brought into the religion of Yahweh and enjoy the rights accorded to all wives by Torah.

Allowing a man to take such a woman back to his home also recognizes and helps to stem the harsh reality of rape in war. This law says that a man is not allowed to simply take whatever woman he wants, but knowing that he can still have her after following the proper procedure (and being reminded of that fact every year when reading Ki Tetzei in the synagogue) can serve to temper his immediate lusts. Chances are very good that after the thirty days of mourning have passed, he will have realized what a crazy idea it is to bring a pagan woman into his house, and he will allow her to leave. If not, then he would be required to begin her education in Torah and her conversion to belief in the True God before he could consummate the marriage. (See Leviticus 19:19, Deuteronomy 7:3, and Deuteronomy 22:9-11.)

If he changes his mind and allows her to leave, she will no longer be a prisoner of war but a free woman with all the rights of a stranger in Israel. Those rights were considerable indeed, especially in light of what she might face in some other land.

Marriage in the Bible

Interview in the Quad City Times

Sunday, May 24th, 2009

Deirdre Baker from the Quad City Times called me a few weeks ago for an interview regarding A Commentary on Marriage in the Bible. You can read the article here. The quotes are paraphrases, but they are more-or-less accurate.

The Myth of Domestic Violence

Wednesday, May 13th, 2009

According to a report by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau (That mouthful sounds like a bureaucratic dream!), the leading cause of physical injury to women 18 and over is accidentally falling, not domestic violence or any other kind of violence against women. Not only is domestic violence not a leading cause of injury to women, all deliberate acts of violence account for only 1.4% of injuries suffered and reported by women.

Potential problems with the report:

  1. It was made by government.
  2. It was made by people.
  3. It depends on accurate reporting in emergency rooms.
  4. It depends on emergency room visits.
  5. It depends on accurate compilation, analysis, etc. I.e. it was made by people.

I’m not saying domestic violence doesn’t exist or isn’t a problem. It’s just not the rampant problem feminists and their allies would have you believe. They are either delusional or they are liars. Take your pick.