Archive for the ‘Men’s Rights’ Category

About the Magen Korper

Friday, August 21st, 2009

The Star of David is called the Magen David in Hebrew, which means “Shield of David.” Archaeologists have found examples of it dating back to within a few decades of David’s reign in Jerusalem, although it has changed somewhat over the centuries. Originally, it might not have had six points, but the modern incarnation seems appropriate to me. The double triangles can be used to illustrate some important concepts about God and his Messiah. That might or might not be why it came to be as it is. There is some evidence that it could have pagan origins, but the evidence is tenuous. If something more solid comes to light, I might decide to stop using it or anything like it.

Magen KorperThe Magen Korper is the symbol I have chosen to represent my house. I began using the Magen David with alternate points connected by arcs as a personal device more than twenty-five years ago, long before I had any conscious interest in the Hebraic roots of the Christian faith. Originally I used it in a series of stories I began writing in elementary school. In the course of my studies of marriage in the Torah, I became convinced that the Jewish tallit, the mantle of Elijah, and the household banners of the wilderness camps are all of the same type. They are emblems of a patriarch’s house and symbols of the authority which God has delegated to them. Deciding that my house should also have a symbol, I took this sign and added a Hebrew kof in the center to represent my family name of Carper. I call it Magen Korper instead of Magen Carper in honor of my family’s immigrant ancestor who spelled it so.

When my son turned thirteen, I had the shield embroidered on the corners of a tallit in a different set of colors to commemorate his adoption of authority in my house as a young man and my firstborn son. I hope that his sons continue to use it or a close variant of it as a sign of familial identity and unity.

Since this symbol represents my house and no other, no one who is not a member of my house or one of my descendants is authorized to use it in any manner. It is my trade mark over which I have exclusive legal ownership.

The Myth of Domestic Violence

Wednesday, May 13th, 2009

According to a report by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau (That mouthful sounds like a bureaucratic dream!), the leading cause of physical injury to women 18 and over is accidentally falling, not domestic violence or any other kind of violence against women. Not only is domestic violence not a leading cause of injury to women, all deliberate acts of violence account for only 1.4% of injuries suffered and reported by women.

Potential problems with the report:

  1. It was made by government.
  2. It was made by people.
  3. It depends on accurate reporting in emergency rooms.
  4. It depends on emergency room visits.
  5. It depends on accurate compilation, analysis, etc. I.e. it was made by people.

I’m not saying domestic violence doesn’t exist or isn’t a problem. It’s just not the rampant problem feminists and their allies would have you believe. They are either delusional or they are liars. Take your pick.

Emor 5769 – Created to Become Unequal

Tuesday, May 5th, 2009

Leviticus 21:1 And the LORD said unto Moses, Speak unto the priests the sons of Aaron, and say unto them…

On some sense, I am sure that everyone is created equal, but I have yet to define what that sense might be. From birth we are all different. Some are stronger, some are hairier, some have different parts, and those differences confer varying responsibilities and powers.

God holds the physical descendants of Aaron to a higher standard than he holds the rest of us. For example, he deals with their sexual immorality much more harshly. The daughters of Aaron must remain virgins until married. If they don’t, the penalty isn’t just stoning. It’s burning.

Aaron’s sons are held to a higher standard than his daughters. Emor gives a short list of things that a priest may not do that other of God’s people may:

  • Touch the corpse of anyone who is not an immediate relative.
  • Shave his head or disfigure his beard.
  • Marry a woman who has sex outside of marriage or who has been divorced.

The High Priest has an even higher standard than that. He may not

  • Touch the corpse of even immediate relatives.
  • Marry a widow or any non-virgin.
  • Leave the sanctuary while performing the duties of his office.
  • Bring anything unclean into the sanctuary.

Paul alluded to this same concept when he told Timothy and Titus his standards for Church leaders. He never intended those lists to be taken as absolute laws for all believers. (Or even for all church leaders, for that matter!) He was illustrating how good leaders must have a different code of behavior. There is no sin in preparing and burying a corpse nor in having a rebellious child, but God said that his priests shouldn’t do those things.

That God’s standards for some people might be different than his standards for others only surprises the inheritors of the so-called Enlightenment. Many good things have come from the philosophical and theological revolutions of the past, but some things have also been lost and corrupted.

Hey! That’s me!

Wednesday, April 22nd, 2009

A Commentary on Marriage in the Bible, Volume 1: the TorahMy first book is now available for purchase! You can get it in trade paperback, PDF, PalmPilot, Microsoft Reader, or Kindle formats. Go here and order ten. Right now.

I mean it.

Now.

Vayakhel 5769 – Marriage and the UFC

Monday, March 16th, 2009

Exodus 35:5

…whosoever is of a willing heart… God invited every individual man, woman, and child to donate the materials of the Tabernacle: the metals, fabrics, oil, spices, and gems, all of the things that, together, symbolize a complete and balanced child of God. They also symbolize the roles of husband, wife, and children in a family. God wanted free-will offerings, because he does not force us to become the people he wants us to be.

A man cannot be forced to love his wife; he must choose to love her. She can manipulate him and cajole him, but the result is not real love. It is form without substance. Likewise, a woman cannot be forced to submit to her husband’s rule. A man can certainly try to force his wife to submit, but he will fail. He can beat her, threaten her, or manipulate her, but he will never have true submission from the heart. Either she will resist to the point at which he is no longer willing to keep her as his wife or else she will become someone else, someone much less than the woman he married.

Ki Tisa 5769 – Judgement Begins

Monday, March 16th, 2009

Exodus 30:20

When they go into the tabernacle of the congregation… Bronze represents judgment, and the priests were to wash in the bronze basin before ministering before God on behalf of the people. This is the same principle in effect when Peter wrote that “judgment must begin at the house of God.” The more authority one has, the more responsibility. A husband and father must undergo judgment and purification before he is fully competent to judge and purify his family.

Tetsaveh 5769 – Defending the Patriarchy

Friday, March 6th, 2009

Exodus 27:21
…Aaron and his sons shall order it…
Not Aaron and his daughters, but Aaron and his sons. There are certainly times when righteous women can and should be in positions of authority, but the example repeatedly given by God is that, under all normal circumstances, men are to order the government, the congregation, and their families.

Mishpatim 5769 – Slavishly Hitched

Tuesday, February 17th, 2009

Exodus 21:3-6

If he came in by himself, he shall go out by himself. I see three levels of meaning in this law.

  1. P’shat: If a man buys a Hebrew slave who is married, the slave’s wife does not become the master’s slave along with her husband, and the slave will take her with him when he leaves the master’s employ. If the master gave the slave one of his female slaves as a wife, she does not cease to be his slave when her husband goes free. She must stay behind unless her master allows her to be purchased or otherwise redeemed.
  2. Drash: Prior claims are not automatically superseded by more recent claims. If God delegates authority over a nation to a king, that does not mean the nation no longer belongs to God. If the king decides to leave his homeland or if he is removed from the throne, God will grant authority over it to another.
  3. Sod: The slave is a believer and the master is Yeshua, our Messiah.
  • There is an unbeliever who converts and then falls away again. If he was unmarried when he converted and remains unmarried when he falls away, then he is only harming himself. It is an unfortunate thing, but still simple.
  • There is a married couple, and both of them are sinners. One of them comes to believe in God and repents, but the other does not. If the believing spouse then falls away again, he leaves God’s congregation with his wife. This is still relatively uncomplicated.
  • There is an unbeliever who converts and then falls away again. In the meantime, however, he married a fellow believer. Their marriage remains valid, sanctified by God, so long as the unbeliever is willing to stay in it. He continues as one of God’s people, only in a state of rebellion. If the unbeliever chooses to leave his spouse and children, then the marriage is dissolved as if he had died.
  • Finally, there is an unbeliever who converts and marries another believer. He dedicates the remainder of his life and his family to serving God and his kingdom. His marriage and family will be blessed.

Yitro 5769 – Men Who Fear God

Thursday, February 12th, 2009

Exodus 18:21

…able men… The word used here for man is ish and not adam. It implies that males are intended and not mankind in general. In accordance with God’s example, Jethro advised Moses to choose men as leaders of the people, and that is what he did. All of Israel’s anointed leaders were men. (Prophets are not leaders so much as they are messengers. Their office is honorable and certainly carries authority, but it is not the authority required for leading a nation or a congregation.) Maleness is not the only requirement for leadership in Israel. These men were to be “able” or chayil. They must have proven their ability by success in business or war. Paul included more detail in his letters to Timothy and Titus, but his requirements were essentially the same as Jethro’s.

Paul (1 Tim 3) – “…the husband of one wife…apt to teach…one that ruleth well his own house…not a novice…he must have a good report of them which are without…”

…such as fear God… Ability alone is not enough to make a great leader of God’s people. He must also be a man of God.

Paul (1 Tim 3) – “…blameless…sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality…patient, not a brawler…”

…men of truth… Not men who are apt to deceive their way into office. The ineptitude of the vast majority of modern politicians is obvious to anyone with eyes to see and ears to hear. That we continue to elect such men and women into leadership is proof of the old adage, we get that government which we deserve.

Paul (1 Tim 3) – “…blameless…vigilant, sober…not greedy of filthy lucre; but patient…he must have a good report…”

…hating covetousness… It is a good thing to desire to lead God’s people, but not to desire it overly much. Remember Yeshua’s words: The first will be last, and he who would lead must serve.

Paul (1 Tim 3) – “…the husband of one wife…given to hospitality…not greedy of filthy lucre…not covetous…”

Download the book here: A Commentary on Marriage in the Bible

Bo 5769 – Opening the Matrix

Friday, January 30th, 2009

Exodus 13:15
…all that openeth the matrix…
There appear to be two ways to interpret this phrase. I do not know which is correct, but I suspect the first:

  1. “Firstborn” refers to the firstborn child of his father. “Openeth the matrix” is a figure of speech extending from the fact that most households, even in a polygamous culture, will have only one man and one woman, and should not to be taken literally. Every house with male children must have a firstborn and only one firstborn. If the first child born in a house is a female, she was the one to “open the matrix,” but she is not called the firstborn. If there are two or three wives in a house, there will be a first child born of each wife, but only one firstborn in the house.
  2. “Firstborn” refers to the firstborn child of his mother. If a man has ten wives, each of whom bears sons, then ten sons must be redeemed. “Firstborn of man” in verse 13 should be understood to mean “firstborn humans.”