Archive for the ‘Love’ Category

The Thought that Counts

Saturday, January 2nd, 2010

Each of these statements of Yeshua had the same core principle: What you think about becomes what you do.

Matthew 5:21-24  Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment:  (22)  But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.  (23)  Therefore if thou bring thy gift to the altar, and there rememberest that thy brother hath ought against thee;  (24)  Leave there thy gift before the altar, and go thy way; first be reconciled to thy brother, and then come and offer thy gift.

Matthew 5:27-28  Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery:  (28)  But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.

Matthew 12:35  A good man out of the good treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth evil things.

Matthew 15:11  Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man.

(Hat tip to Doug W.)

Publishing Private Thoughts

Friday, January 1st, 2010

Everything I write is inspired somehow by my real life. I imagine that’s true for all writers. Some things I’ve written–some of the most profound things–were directly inspired by real life events, by meat space interactions with real people. I realized a long time ago that most people don’t appreciate their dirty laundry being aired in public, so then I tried to couch those thoughts in ambiguous and impersonal terms, to remove them a step or two from real life. I thought I was doing good by hiding names and specific details.

That wasn’t enough.

I just removed forty-six posts from my blog. Not because they weren’t valuable. Many of them contained profound and important truths, but I can’t say the things I need to say and still maintain good relationships with the people around me. I don’t know how to reconcile the two right now, so the world will just have to survive with a hobbled version of my personal truth.

Love is the Law

Tuesday, December 15th, 2009
  • If you love God, you will obey his commands.
  • If you are not obeying God’s commands, you do not love God.
  • If you love God, you will love your neighbor.
  • If you do not love your neighbor, you are not obeying God’s commands.
  • If you do not love your neighbor, you do not love God.

What, then, does it mean to love your neighbor?

Funny you should ask. God gave us a book all about it.

Update: After I wrote this, I listened to another sermon from Jim Staley called “Love vs. Law.” It’s good, but quite long.

Ki Tetzei 5769 – Love Her or Leave Her Alone

Tuesday, September 1st, 2009

Late again. Sorry.

Deuteronomy 21:10-14 When thou goest forth to war against thine enemies, and the LORD thy God hath delivered them into thine hands, and thou hast taken them captive, (11) And seest among the captives a beautiful woman, and hast a desire unto her, that thou wouldest have her to thy wife; (12) Then thou shalt bring her home to thine house; and she shall shave her head, and pare her nails; (13) And she shall put the raiment of her captivity from off her, and shall remain in thine house, and bewail her father and her mother a full month: and after that thou shalt go in unto her, and be her husband, and she shall be thy wife. (14) And it shall be, if thou have no delight in her, then thou shalt let her go whither she will; but thou shalt not sell her at all for money, thou shalt not make merchandise of her, because thou hast humbled her.

The practice of taking captive women as concubines has long been frowned upon in western cultures, and for good reason. As with marrying more than one woman, marrying a prisoner of war is a complicated and difficult proposition. A man of weak character can’t pull it off, and a man of poor character can’t do it well. On the other hand, difficult doesn’t mean sinful or impossible. In fact, in the context of the ancient near east–probably in other contexts as well–marriage was one of the best options available. It is better than killing her with the rest of her people or leaving her to be abused or enslaved by some other nation. At least as a concubine to an Israelite, she would be brought into the religion of Yahweh and enjoy the rights accorded to all wives by Torah.

Allowing a man to take such a woman back to his home also recognizes and helps to stem the harsh reality of rape in war. This law says that a man is not allowed to simply take whatever woman he wants, but knowing that he can still have her after following the proper procedure (and being reminded of that fact every year when reading Ki Tetzei in the synagogue) can serve to temper his immediate lusts. Chances are very good that after the thirty days of mourning have passed, he will have realized what a crazy idea it is to bring a pagan woman into his house, and he will allow her to leave. If not, then he would be required to begin her education in Torah and her conversion to belief in the True God before he could consummate the marriage. (See Leviticus 19:19, Deuteronomy 7:3, and Deuteronomy 22:9-11.)

If he changes his mind and allows her to leave, she will no longer be a prisoner of war but a free woman with all the rights of a stranger in Israel. Those rights were considerable indeed, especially in light of what she might face in some other land.

Marriage in the Bible

Chukat 5769 – If You Love Me…

Monday, June 29th, 2009

Numbers 20:10-12 And Moses and Aaron gathered the congregation together before the rock, and he said to them, Hear now you rebels. Must we bring water for you out of this rock? (11) And Moses lifted up his hand, and with his rod he struck the rock twice. And the water came out plentifully, and the congregation and their animals drank. (12) And Jehovah spoke to Moses and Aaron, Because you did not believe Me, to sanctify Me in the eyes of the sons of Israel, therefore you shall not bring this congregation into the land which I have given them.

John 19:34 But one of the soldiers pierced His side with a lance, and instantly there came out blood and water.

We are meant to see a parallel between this rock and the Messiah, and Paul points it out in 1 Corinthians 10:4.

…they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ.

There are several traditions concerning this rock that may or may not be true. For example, some say that the rock actually followed the Israelites around the desert and that it really was a pre-incarnate appearance of the Messiah. Others say that Moses’ first strike drew blood from the rock. Only his second strike drew water. Make of that what you will.

I had another thought while reading this passage. There are two ways in which Yeshua’s people strike him: legalism and licentiousness. Both attack him through disobedience. Legalism replaces God’s commands with man’s or elevates the words above the one who gave them through Moses (which is essentially the same thing since the greatest commandment of all is to love the Lawgiver with all your being). Licentiousness simply dismisses God’s commands as irrelevant, elevating the subject above both the words and the master.

In one way or another, we are all probably guilty of both. Some say that anyone who works on Sunday or drinks alcohol or smokes cigarettes is a degenerate sinner destined to burn in hell. Others say that Jesus set us free from all the old rules, that now it’s all about following your conscience. Consider what Yeshua and Paul had to say about these two nomological errors:

Mark 7:7-9 However, they worship Me in vain, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.” (8) For laying aside the commandment of God, you hold the tradition of men, the dippings of pots and cups. And many other such things you do. (9) And He said to them, Do you do well to set aside the commandment of God, so that you may keep your own tradition?

Romans 6:1-4 What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin so that grace may abound? (2) Let it not be! How shall we who died to sin live any longer in it? (3) Do you not know that as many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into His death? (4) Therefore we were buried with Him by baptism into death, so that as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father; even so we also should walk in newness of life.

It doesn’t matter if you wander too far to the left or to the right. Either way, you will still end up in a ditch. Whether we replace God’s laws with man’s traditions or with rules of our own making, we still sin. Yeshua told us plainly what he expects of us: “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind. This is the first and great commandment.” At another time he said, “If you love Me, keep My commandments.”

If we love God, we will obey his commandments. That is not just a commandment on it’s own. It’s a statement of fact: If you love God, you will obey God.

Matthew 5:19 Therefore whoever shall relax one of these commandments, the least, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of Heaven. But whoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of Heaven.

Yeshua’s words should send chills down the spine of today’s Christians and Jews. They have good reason to be afraid. Fortunately, God is merciful and forgives those who repent. Obeying God’s Law (aka Torah) isn’t very complicated, but it can take a long time to learn it and to break old habits. Fortunately, Yeshua gave us a very good starting point: The second greatest commandment is very like the first. “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” John wrote some very practical advice along these lines:

1 John 4:20-21 If anyone says, I love God, and hates his brother, he is a liar. For if he does not love his brother whom he has seen, how can he love God whom he has not seen? (21) And we have this commandment from Him, that he who loves God should love his brother also.

To learn how to love your brother (Don’t presume that you already know! Our culture hides many hateful things under the guise of love.), I suggest you first read the Letter that James wrote to the exiles of Israel. (James 1:1-5:20) After that, go back to Moses. He wrote several books on the subject.

Update July 1, 2009: As the rock gave water even when Moses disobeyed God’s instructions, to an extent, so too does God give his Spirit to both legalists and antinomians. Yeshua said that those who do not keep Torah or do not teach others to do likewise will be called the least in Heaven, implying that they would at least still be there. Walking in a roadside ditch will still get you to the right place. It will just be a slower and more difficult journey.

Toldot 5769 – Playing Favorites

Saturday, November 22nd, 2008

Genesis 25:28

And Isaac loved Esau, but Rebekah loved Jacob. It was not that Isaac hated Jacob or that Rebekah hated Esau, but that they each favored one over the other. To a certain extent, when there is more than one of anything, whether they are children, wives, toys, or tools, one will always be loved more than the others. There is not necessarily anything wrong with that. Isaac apparently approved of Esau’s skill in hunting, his manliness if you will, while Rebekah approved of Jacob’s more broad-based focus. Of itself, this is not a terrible thing, but taken too far it can cause neglect and jealousy, as in the case of Jacob’s relationship with Rachel and Leah. Perhaps Jacob learned this behavior from his parents.

Ha’azinu 5768 – This Is the Way Love Is

Monday, October 6th, 2008

Deuteronomy 32:4-5  He is the Rock; His work is perfect. For all His ways are just, a God of faithfulness, and without evil; just and upright is He. They have corrupted themselves: they are not His sons; it is their blemish; they are a crooked and perverse generation.

God does not violate his own Law, nor does he force anyone else to do so. “They have corrupted themselves,” and they deserve their end. We all do. It is solely by his mercy and his obedience to his own law* that we escape destruction.

* If God keeps his own Law, does that mean he is under the Law? That he is accountable to it? Of course not. He is accountable to no one but himself. Likewise if we keep the Law, neither does it mean that we are under it. We are under the Messiah, and keep the Law for his sake and for the sake of those who see it.

Spiritual Network Security

Thursday, March 13th, 2008

Correctly structured relationships can be thought of as a sort of spiritual network security system and headcoverings are like firewalls. A covering in the wrong place can degrade communications and a missing firewall can leave one open to attack. If a man does not properly cover his wife with authority and love, or if a woman prays or prophesies without his covering, their prayers might be hindered by the cherubim of the throne room who act as Heaven’s firewall blocking packets with corrupted spiritual signatures. She will also be vulnerable to attack, because she is missing her own firewall. When she prophesies, there is a strong possibility that she is receiving packets with a spoofed source address. If a man prays or prophesies with his head covered, the covering is a like a misplaced firewall that interferes with outgoing communications. (1 Peter 3:1-7 and 1 Corinthians 11:2-16)

Technorati Tags: , , ,

The Righteous with the Wicked

Monday, October 22nd, 2007

Another book excerpt for your enjoyment and edification…

Genesis 18:22-32
…wilt thou also destroy the righteous with the wicked?
  In a city of some thirty or forty thousands God found only one man who had not given himself to licentiousness. If God had found only ten men—less than one-tenth of one percent—he would have called the city redeemable. This shows the forbearance of God. Sodom was not destroyed capriciously, but was given every chance to redeem herself. Some call her destruction unjust and call God cruel and unloving; they ask how can God be love when he shows such hatred? They say such things because they do not understand love. They have in mind the indefinable slush of popular romance stories, which have as much to do with love as sugar has to do with nutrition. God’s actions against Sodom, Gomorrah, and later, all of Canaan, demonstrate the love of a physician who removes a tumor or a gangrenous limb to save his patient’s life. What love can a man have for a diseased limb? If he loves the rest of his body, he cuts it off as God removed Sodom, showing love for her neighbors. Even then, God is much more capable than any human surgeon. If even a relatively small percentage of your leg is infected, your doctor will order the whole thing removed. But all God needs to redeem the whole limb is one tiny piece of healthy tissue. All that was healthy in Sodom was one man. His daughters and wife were too far gone, but God still saved some of them for Lot’s sake. He would have saved them all if they had been willing. God gave them a choice to escape and they refused, so a few of the redeemable were destroyed by their own choice along with the reprobate. If Lot, a man whom Peter called righteous and just, had refused to leave, thinking he might convert a few of the Sodomites before the end, then he too would have been destroyed. When it finally rains, it rains on everyone.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

Kosher, part 1: The Root of Obedience

Tuesday, October 2nd, 2007

Although my primary topic is diet, first I should address the question of obedience to Torah in general. Actually, I should say “obedience to God,” because that’s really what this is about. The Torah holds no power of its own. It cannot condemn me or any other believer in Yeshua. (Forgive my use of the more Hebraic pronounciation. I’ve been using it so long that “Jesus” sounds too unnatural to me.) Our allegiance–our obligation of obedience–is to God and not to any written code. I do not obey out of a desire to earn salvation or to be righteous on my own merit. That would be impossible. No one can save himself or make himself righteous. I obey, because that’s what I believe God wants me to do. (Does that make me more righteous? Well, perhaps more righteous than I would be otherwise, but it’s a bit like trying to light the dark side of the moon with a pen light.) I just finished reading Ecclesiastes through a couple of times, and Solomon said it much better than I ever could. He wrote that all the sacrifice, all the upright living, all the generosity, all the kindness one could ever do amounts to nothing next to obedience to God. So if anyone is tempted to tell warn me that my salvation is in jeapordy because of my obedience, just relax. Take a cue from Triton, and don’t get so excited. You don’t have to agree with me, but at least acknowledge that stricter obedience is my prerogative.

Every major Christian denomination for the last 1800 years has believed that God’s dietary laws were repealed by Jesus. Therefore, when I say the opposite, I realize that I am making an extraordinary claim requiring extraordinary proof. I have a great deal of respect for the early church fathers, and I believe that their testimony is important, but their writings are not on a par with previous scripture. “Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but try the spirits to see if they are of God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world.” Perhaps “every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is of God,” but not everyone who confesses so teaches accurate theology. Everything the church fathers said and wrote must be weighed against God’s words. Where there is a contradiction, God’s words must take precedence.

In fact, I will go one step further. All scripture must be understood in light of previous scripture. Samuel will not contradict Moses, Jeremiah will not contradict Samuel, and Paul will not contradict Jeremiah. The one might clarify the other, for example, Yeshua clarified Moses’ writings on divorce, punishment, and life-after-death. He did not, however, contradict. If Paul ever taught contrary to Yeshua, then Paul was a false teacher, at least on that topic. The same goes for Ignatius or Origen or Augustine.

The Torah makes no distinction between moral, civil, and ceremonial law. At best, these are abstract, logical distinctions. They are not found in the Torah nor anywhere else in the Bible, but only in the writings of theologians. The truth is that all of the individual statues–every single one of them–are outgrowths of one: “Love the Lord your God will all your heart, with all your spirit, and with all your mind,” which Yeshua called the first and greatest commandment. The second commandment is a corollary of the first: Love your neighbor as yourself, because you and he are both made in the image of God. If I love God, I must also love my neighbor. These are the overriding principles of the Torah. The first commandment leads to the second. Those two lead to the Ten Commandments and all the rest. With sufficient knowledge of the workings of the spiritual and physical universes, all of the rules contained in the Torah could be derived by reason from the first two. (With a few possible exceptions, but those aren’t relevant to my purposes.) Yeshua said that all of the Law and the Prophets (aka the Tanakh) depends on the two great commands, and Paul said that all of us have sinned. James told us that anyone who breaks one small point of the law is guilty of breaking the entire thing. Every commandment loves your neighbor, respects God, draws you closer to God, so that they each make up small parts of a unified whole.

If I do not obey for salvation, and I do not obey to make myself righteous, then why do I bother to obey at all? Partly out of self interest (The Torah teaches us how to live at peace with ourselves and each other.), partly because of tradition (I was brought up to keep most of the ten commandments and much of the rest of God’s Law.), but most importantly, I obey because I love God. So when I say that Christians are required to abstain from pork, you have to understand me from this perspective and ask yourself, “Required for what?” The answer is deceptively simple and cliche in our culture of feel-good new-agism, but it’s still true: love.

“If you love me, keep my commandments.”

If you love God, keep his commandments.

Kosher, part 2: Are Dietary Laws Obsolete?…later.

Technorati Tags: , , ,