Archive for the ‘Torah’ Category

God Is Not Binary

Saturday, April 17th, 2010

When God made mankind, he put them in the Garden and told them they could eat from every plant, right?

Genesis 1:29  And God said, “Behold, I have given you every plant yielding seed that is on the face of all the earth, and every tree with seed in its fruit. You shall have them for food.

Genesis 1:1-2:3 is a summary of creation week. Genesis 2:4-25 tells the same exact story but from a different vantage point. It’s hazy regarding the passage of time, leaves out some details, and adds some others. That doesn’t mean the two accounts are contradictory, only that they have different foci.

There is one problem, however. There is an apparent contradiction between Genesis 1:29 and 2:16-17.

Genesis 2:16-17  And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, “You may surely eat of every tree of the garden,  (17)  but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die.”

Which is it? Can man eat every plant or not? The answer is yes!*

There is no contradiction. The confusion is not in the words, but in the reader who treats them like a mathematical text. Genesis was written to be understood by ordinary people. It’s bare meaning had to be accessible to shepherds and farmers, so it was written in the same basic language that they themselves used. When a subsistence farmer says, “Let’s get all these fields planted,” does he mean every single field in existence? Of course not. Does he even mean all of his own fields? No again. He only means all the fields that are supposed to be planted at this time, and he expects that everyone to whom he is speaking will understand that. The ancient Hebrews knew the story of the Garden of Eden and the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. When they heard it read, “I have given you every plant that grows on the earth,” they didn’t need to hear “except for this one” to understand that there was at least one exception.

We don’t need to hear it either. Instead, we need to understand that God and his words recorded in the Scriptures are holistic. They are a unified whole (echad in Hebrew) with depth and height and breadth. We cannot understand the words of Paul or John without understanding Moses and Isaiah, because the latter are a foundation and framework for the former. Likewise, since we do not live within the cultural context of Moses or Isaiah, we cannot completely understand their words either without Paul and John to finish the walls and trim. Scripture is a house, not a line.

* Consider Genesis 9:3 and Leviticus 11 with this principle in mind.

Tazria-Metsora 5770 – Leprosy

Wednesday, April 14th, 2010

God knows all about disease. He knows its what causes it, what prevents it, and what heals it. Therefore, if his instructions regarding a disease make no scientific sense to you or me, then our understanding is deficient, not his. We misunderstand his instructions or the disease.

This week’s double Torah portion, Tazria-Metsora, spends a lot of ink on something called tsaraat. Although that word has been historically translated as “leprosy,” Tazria and Metsora do not appear to be addressing the disease we know as Leprosy (aka Hansen’s Disease) today.

Characteristics of Hansen’s Disease

  • Not highly contagious.
  • Does not heal spontaneously.
  • Causes numbness.
  • Can cause the loss of fingers, toes, and sight.
  • Infects only people and armadillos.
  • Skin lesions and hair loss.
  • Fever

Characteristics of Tsaraat

  • Contagious enough to warrant solitary quarantine (no leper colonies allowed!)
  • Can heal spontaneously.
  • Infects people, cloth, leather, and stone.
  • Skin lesions and hair loss.
  • Fever

There is a superficial similarity to the symptoms, but it is apparent that tsaraat does not equal Hansen’s Disease. More likely, Hansen’s is a subset of a larger category of conditions comprehended in biblical leprosy, which must include a variety of bacterial and fungal infections.

The rabbinic understanding is that tsaraat is caused by lashon hara or an evil tongue. In other words, gossiping, back-biting, libel, slander, and “sharing” can all be manifested in a physical condition. In such a case, it is not so much the physical condition that requires solitary confinement, but that of the heart, “for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.” Compare two other biblical passages that involve symptoms of tzaraat:

Numbers 12:1,10  And Miriam and Aaron spake against Moses because of the Ethiopian woman whom he had married: for he had married an Ethiopian woman….And the cloud departed from off the tabernacle; and, behold, Miriam became leprous, white as snow: and Aaron looked upon Miriam, and, behold, she was leprous.

Isaiah 3:16-17,24  Moreover the LORD saith, Because the daughters of Zion are haughty, and walk with stretched forth necks and wanton eyes, walking and mincing as they go, and making a tinkling with their feet:  (17)  Therefore the Lord will smite with a scab the crown of the head of the daughters of Zion, and the LORD will discover their secret parts….And it shall come to pass, that instead of sweet smell there shall be stink; and instead of a girdle a rent; and instead of well set hair baldness; and instead of a stomacher a girding of sackcloth; and burning instead of beauty.

I am not completely convinced that lashon hara specifically causes tzaraat, but it certainly seems that some spiritual condition can trigger it, perhaps lashon hara or pride. In either case, the cure is humble obedience to God’s commands.

Update April 17, 2010: Tony Robinson says that tzaraat is caused by disrespecting the authority of God’s prophets and priests. I think he is on the right track, but I will go further and say that, based on Isaiah 3, it might be disrespect toward all divinely appointed authority.

Sh’mini 5770 Assignment

Saturday, April 10th, 2010

Leviticus 10:6  And Moses said to Aaron and to Eleazar and Ithamar his sons, Do not uncover your heads nor tear your clothes, lest you die, and lest He be angry on all the people. But let your brothers, the whole of Israel, mourn the burning which YHWH has kindled.

Assignment for April 10, 2010: Be careful that your emotions don’t lead you to neglect your responsibilities to those around you. Keep close tabs on your feelings this week. If you sense that anger, resentment, sorrow, jealousy, or some other emotion is pushing you away from some task or decision on which you know other people are depending, make a conscious choice to fulfill your responsibility in spite of your feelings.

Check back and post your thoughts and experiences. Next week I’ll post a new assignment derived from Tazria-Metsora.

No Longer Foreigners

Tuesday, April 6th, 2010

Ephesians 2:19  Now therefore ye are no more strangers (xenos, meaning “alien” or “foreigner”) and foreigners (paroikos, meaning “resident alien” or “sojourner”), but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God…

Putting it another way, “Now therefore you are no longer gentiles or even sojourners, but fellow citizens with the holy people and members of the house of God.”

Put yet another way, “You have become Israel, united as one people with Judah.”

Sh’mini 5770 – Self-Directed Worship

Tuesday, April 6th, 2010

Leviticus 10:1  And Nadab and Abihu, the sons of Aaron, each took his censer and put fire in it, and put incense on it, and offered strange fire before YHWH, which He had not commanded them.

Leviticus 10:16-20  And Moses carefully looked for the goat of the sin offering. And behold, it was burned! And he was angry with Eleazar and Ithamar, the sons of Aaron left alive, saying,  (17)  Why have you not eaten the sin offering in the holy place, since it is most holy, and He has given it to you to bear the iniquity of the congregation, to make atonement for them before Jehovah?  (18)  Behold! The blood of it was not brought within the holy place! You should indeed have eaten it in the sanctuary, as I commanded.  (19)  And Aaron said to Moses, Behold, this day they have offered their sin offering and their burnt offering before YHWH. And such things have happened to me. And if I had eaten the sin offering today, should it have been accepted in the sight of YHWH?  (20)  And Moses heard, and it was good in his eyes.

Aaron’s sons, Nadab and Abihu, spontaneously worshiped God by offering incense, and they were destroyed for it. Aaron disobeyed God by not precisely following the rules of the sin offering. Nadab and Abihu were destroyed, while Aaron was justified. God appears to have acted arbitrarily and unfairly.

This appearance is due to our limited vision. God sees through us. He knows us all the way down to the heart and bone. Nadab and Abihu were not destroyed for an act of spontaneous worship. They were destroyed for acting presumptuously. They said in their hearts, “We know what God really wants. We can improve on the worship he commanded.” Aaron was not destroyed, despite his disobedience, because he said in his heart, “I am full of sorrow and anger and am not able to atone for the sins of the people with such sin in my heart.” Instead of eating some of the sacrifice and using the blood to atone for Israel, he burned it all, sending everything directly to God. Although he was disobedient, he acted out of humility and reverence, while his sons acted out of pride.

On These Two Commandments…

Tuesday, April 6th, 2010

The next move in our study of love in the Torah is to make some deliberate, practical applications. Each week at our Torah reading, we’ll pick something out of the parsha or related passages that teaches us something about love, and we’ll make it real over the following week. We’ll look for opportunities to apply the lesson, showing love to God and man in fact instead of only in theory.

The Adultery of Easter

Sunday, April 4th, 2010

Exodus 23:13-15  “Pay attention to all that I have said to you, and make no mention of the names of other gods, nor let it be heard on your lips.  (14)  “Three times in the year you shall keep a feast to me.  (15)  You shall keep the Feast of Unleavened Bread. As I commanded you, you shall eat unleavened bread for seven days at the appointed time in the month of Abib, for in it you came out of Egypt. None shall appear before me empty-handed.

Christians replace the appointed times of God (Daniel 7:25) with the days and names of false gods. In what universe would the Creator of heaven and earth approve of using the names of one of his rivals with whom his people repeatedly committed adultery to celebrate the death and resurrection of his only Son? That is obscenely offensive! It is no accident that he commanded us to keep the Feast of Unleavened Bread immediately after commanding us not to speak the names of false gods. These two commands are directed squarely at so-called Christians who celebrate Ashteroth and her abomination that brings desolation and the sacrifice of pigs instead of Passover, sanctification, and resurrection of Yeshua ha Maschiach.

No Torah Study this Weekend

Monday, March 29th, 2010

There will be no Torah study this weekend. Normal schedule will resume on April 10th.

Chag sameach Pesach!

Paul’s Controversy

Sunday, March 28th, 2010

Galatians 5:2  Behold, I, Paul, say to you that if you are circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.

Those are pretty strong words. What should we tell the hundreds of millions of American men? Sorry. You missed the boat. You now have to obey every “jot and tittle” of the Law or you’ll go to Hell. Of course not. Nobody believes that the physical condition of being circumcised equates to a rejection of salvation by grace. What most people actually believe is that if a man voluntarily becomes circumcised as a religious act of obedience to God’s command, only then has he rejected Jesus’ work on the Cross. By legalistically adhering to an outmoded command, he acts as if Jesus’ death and resurrection accomplished nothing.

That certainly sounds like a reasonable interpretation. It doesn’t condemn innocent children for things outside their control, and it emphasizes the liberty we have in Christ. It sounds good, but is it? Keeping in mind Peter’s admonition that a correct understanding of Paul’s letters requires a solid grounding in the Torah and Tanakh (2 Peter 3:15-16), perhaps we should  look a little further. Although the older Scriptures have plenty to say about circumcision and salvation by grace, we need look no further than the book of Acts.

Acts 16:3-4  Paul wanted him to go with him, and taking him he circumcised him, because of the Jews who were in those places; for they all knew that his father was a Greek.  (4)  And as they passed through the cities, they delivered to them the commandments to keep, the ones that were ordained by the apostles and elders in Jerusalem.

There is no question that Timothy voluntarily submitted to this circumcision. He was a grown man, after all. So Paul, who said that circumcision equaled damnation, circumcised Timothy? No! Paul, who said that you cannot be saved by circumcision, circumcised Timothy! In several places in Acts, Luke writes that the great controversy that followed Paul was whether or not a person must be circumcised and keep the whole Law of Moses in order to be saved (E.g. Acts 15:1). The Torah, the Tanakh, the teachings of Yeshua…all of these things stand against such a teaching. The issue was never about whether or not circumcision is a good or bad thing. It was always about salvation. The commandments “ordained by the apostles and elders in Jerusalem” said nothing about circumcision. In fact, they were specifically given to counter the Pharisaical teaching that a man must be circumcised and keep the whole Law in order to be saved. Yet Paul, before he goes out to spread the word against circumcision, circumcises his traveling companion!

Obviously, Paul was not opposed to circumcision nor to keeping the Law of Moses. However, he was adamantly opposed to keeping the traditions of men (that still to this day are commonly referred to as the Law of Moses or the Torah) and to keeping the Law for salvation. There were two parties fighting for control of the church in Galatia. On the one hand, there were the followers of James and Paul teaching them that salvation is only through faith in the grace of God, and that obedience to God’s laws can be learned over time. On the other hand, there were the Judaizers teaching that everyone must obey the Law first and submit to the authority of the rabbis and the centuries of tradition built up on top of the Law before they could be truly considered “saved.” When Paul wrote, “if you are circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing,” he was writing within the context of this argument. He was saying, “If you join the party of the circumcision and rely on that for your salvation, then the Messiah is wasted on you.”

I am not under the Law, nor is anyone else who has put their trust in God for their eternal salvation. That does not mean that the Law no longer applies to us. It means that we are not condemned by it. We don’t have to worry and stress about getting it perfectly. We can focus on serving God in our daily lives, on loving him and sharing his love with those around us while we use his Torah to help us learn what that really means.

Tzav 5770 – For Love of God and Man

Saturday, March 27th, 2010

Tony Robinson pointed out some interesting facts about the five sacrifices detailed in the first two Torah portions of Leviticus. The text seems needlessly repetitious, but there is a purpose. In Vayikra, God instructs the Israelites how to make offerings in order to draw closer to him. In Tzav, he instructs the priests on how to dispose of those offerings. But there’s more to it than just that. If you read carefully, you’ll notice that the sacrifices are listed in a slightly different order in each place. As Robinson shows, the offerings are grouped according to an inexplicit classification.

In Vayikra the first three offerings (burnt, grain, and peace) are voluntary, while the last two (sin and guilt) are not. In Tzav, the first offering is completely burned up, the next three are partly burned and partly consumed by the priest, and the final offering is partly burned, partly eaten by the priest, and mostly eaten by the offerer and his community.

Although I don’t know exactly what to make of the following correlations, I think they are correct.

Five is the number of Torah, and there are five sacrifices. The purpose of both Torah and the sacrifices is to draw us closer to YHWH. (See Vayikra 5770 – Approaching under Cover.)

  • The burnt offering is something wholly given to God, and there are commandments in the Torah which are designed to bring us closer to God the Father.
  • The grain, sin, and guilt offerings are partly given to God and partly to the priest. There are many mitzvot throughout the Torah that draw us closer to God while foreshadowing the ministry of the Messiah as a high priest after the order of Melchizedek. (There is something else here about Moses and the order of Melchizedek, but I’ll save it for another time.)
  • The peace offering, like many mitzvot concerning how to live at peace with one’s neighbors, is designed to draw us closer to God as a community, to make us a united people under the banner of the Messiah.

I believe the order in Vayikra says something about another layer of classification that can be overlaid on the Torah, but I will save that for another day too. Vayikra 5771 perhaps.