Posts Tagged ‘antinomianism’

Ki Tavo 5770 – the Curse of the Law

Saturday, August 28th, 2010

Deuteronomy 26:1-29:8
Isaiah 60:1-22
Luke 20:45-21:4

God told Israel to build a monument on Mt. Ebal and carve on it the words of the Law. Then he told half of them to stand there and pronounce curses for disobedience. The other half were to stand on Mt. Gerizim and pronounce blessings for obedience.

The antinomian church might say that the Law was written on Ebal because the Law brings a curse. Superficially that sounds good to someone who has never paid attention to Torah. It falls apart when one remembers that the curses are only for disobedience. The blessings that the other half of Israel pronounced from Gerizim are also included in the Law. It is true that the Law brings a curse, but the Law also brings a blessing. God’s Law was not present only on Mt. Ebal. It was there on both mountain tops, but where was it on Mt. Gerizim?

Here’s a hint: It was not carved on stone.

God wrote his Law on stone because the hearts of Israel were too hard to accept it, but that’s not where he wants it to remain. He has promised that in the New Covenant, his Law will be written on flesh. To those for whom the Law remains only on stone, whose hearts are too hard to receive it, it is most certainly a curse, but to those who internalize it, who invite YHWH to write it on their hearts, who learn to love it, to them the Law is full of blessings. This is why God told Israel to write the Law on a stone monument on Mt. Ebal: hard hearts and the Law on stone on one hand and the Law written on hearts of flesh on the other.

Update 08/30/2010: In a podcast recorded last year, Grant Luton of Beth Tikkun Messianic Fellowship explained why the altar was built on Mt. Ebal. Yeshua did not come for the hale, but for the sick, for those still under the authority of the Law.

Once and for All…Again

Saturday, August 14th, 2010

Matthew 5:17  Do not think that I have come to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I have not come to destroy but to fulfill.

When Jesus said that he came to fulfill the law, he meant that he would make it so we wouldn’t have to keep the law ourselves.

Romans 13:8-10  Owe no one anything, except to love one another; for he who loves another has fulfilled the Law.  (9)  For: “Do not commit adultery; do not murder; do not steal; do not bear false witness; do not lust;” and if there is any other commandment, it is summed up in this word, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”  (10)  Love works no ill to its neighbor, therefore love is the fulfilling of the Law.

Galatians 5:13-14  For, brothers, you were called to liberty. Only do not use the liberty for an opening to the flesh, but by love serve one another.  (14)  For all the Law is fulfilled in one word, even in this, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”

James 2:8  If you fulfill the royal Law according to the Scripture, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself,” you do well.

When Paul and James said that we fulfill the law by loving one another, they meant we only need to love one another once because then the law will be fulfilled and we won’t need to keep it anymore. But they were really just wasting ink since Jesus already fulfilled the law once for everyone. We don’t have to love anyone even once now because that would be trying to keep the law and that’s legalism.

</sarcasm>

Korach 5770 – Place

Saturday, June 12th, 2010

Numbers 16:1-18:32
I Samuel 11:14-12:22
Romans 13:1-10

Order and hierarchy have been inherent in God’s plan from the very beginning, whether among the angels, in the Garden of Eden, among men, or within families. Although the laws that govern spiritual authority are not as readily subject to experiment and objective verification as the laws that govern chemical reactions, they are just as real and just as inviolable. A man who continually drinks dilute amounts of drano will eventually suffer from alkaline poisoning whether he learned the lessons of high school chemistry or not. He might get away with it for a short while, but the consequences of his actions will catch up with him. The same is true of those who reject spiritual authority. Women who reject the spiritual covering of their fathers or husbands, men who reject the authority of God’s anointed prophets and judges, children who reject the authority of their parents…They might live indefinitely believing that they have chosen their own path, that they have found freedom in self-governance. Really, they have left one service for another and gained nothing lasting in the transaction. After all, who is more free? The slave whose master will defend him and who trusts him with a great deal of autonomy? Or the escaped slave who has no resources, no shelter, and who has become an open and defenseless target for abuse and re-enslavement by another master? The latter may appear to have more freedom in the immediate sense of having no allegiance and no duty to a higher power, but in the long run, his available choices will be severely limited and possibly eliminated altogether.

Numbers 16:1-18:32
I Samuel 11:14-12:22
Romans 13:1-10