<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Soil from Stone &#187; dating</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historycarper.com/wordpress/tag/dating/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historycarper.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>Jay&#039;s thoughts on stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:48:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Woman Calculator</title>
		<link>http://www.historycarper.com/wordpress/2008/the-woman-calculator/</link>
		<comments>http://www.historycarper.com/wordpress/2008/the-woman-calculator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jay c</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Men's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historycarper.com/wordpress/?p=395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve had a few years now to think about what traits (or lack of traits) I would want in a potential mate, as well as what traits are complete deal killers. The deal killers aren&#8217;t necessarily the things that are most important to me, but they have a cut-off point, beyond which I am not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had a few years now to think about what traits (or lack of traits) I would want in a potential mate, as well as what traits are complete deal killers. The deal killers aren&#8217;t necessarily the things that are most important to me, but they have a cut-off point, beyond which I am not willing to go. For example, I don&#8217;t care whether a woman is a genius or just barely above average, but if she&#8217;s stupid, then I&#8217;m not interested.</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Respect</strong>. She can&#8217;t be rude or spiteful. She has to treat other people, especially me, with respect.</li>
<li><strong>Patriarchy</strong>. She can&#8217;t want to be in charge. I suspect that all women have a tendency toward manipulation and control, but if she knows this and tries to suppress it, that&#8217;s all I ask. She has to believe that her husband is her head and be willing to submit herself to him and her will to his.</li>
<li><strong>Integrity</strong>. She can&#8217;t be a thief, a cheat, or too much of a hypocrite.</li>
<li><strong>Figure</strong>. I&#8217;m OK with athletic, thin, chubby, tall, or short. But she can&#8217;t be obese, skeletally thin, muscle-bound, or terribly misshappen. Call me shallow if you want, but if I&#8217;m not in the least turned on by what I see and feel, then that is going to be a serious hinderance to a relationship.</li>
<li><strong>Age</strong>. At least 18 (preferably over 25, but some young women are exceptional) and no more than 5 years my senior. I&#8217;m not interested in jail bait, and how many teenage girls in today&#8217;s America are settled enough to handle a husband and children? On the downside, how many 25-40 year old women aren&#8217;t bitter, sick, or have to hire a bellhop to carry all their baggage around?</li>
<li><strong>Honesty</strong>. Related, but not quite the same as integrity. So many women lie as a matter of course. Much of the time, they don&#8217;t even realize they&#8217;re doing it. They lie to protect themselves or to spare someone&#8217;s feelings or just because they feel like it. Nobody is perfectly honest, but there&#8217;s a limit.</li>
<li><strong>Beauty</strong>. An attractive face is clearly a plus, but beauty eventually fades. I don&#8217;t care if a woman is plain, just so long as she isn&#8217;t hideous. Fortunately for all of us, really ugly faces are even more rare than beautiful ones.</li>
<li><strong>Baggage</strong>. Everybody has issues, everybody has baggage, but a person has to be able to function. I&#8217;m not interested in anyone who&#8217;s bipolar, psychotic, misandric, rage-filled, possessed, exceptionally bitter, too self-hating, etc&#8230;</li>
<li><strong>Religion</strong>. She has to be a believer. She doesn&#8217;t have to agree with me on everything as long as she is in <em>general</em> agreement and knows that I set the rules in my house. If she doesn&#8217;t know Yahweh, then she can hang out and be friends, but that&#8217;s as far as it&#8217;ll go.</li>
<li><strong>Intelligence</strong>. As I already said, I don&#8217;t care if she isn&#8217;t a genius, as long as she isn&#8217;t stupid. I don&#8217;t need a woman to match wits with me, but I need to know that my house will remain in order if I am absent. I need her to be able to understand me when I speak and to respond in an intelligent manner. If there will be children, then she needs to be able to teach them.</li>
</ol>
<p>I gave weights (from 1 to 5) to these characterstics and 26 more and put them in one column on a spreadsheet. I then ranked several women by how they scored. If she doesn&#8217;t have the characteristic, then she gets a score of 0. If she has it in moderation, then she gets a score of the characteristic weight times 1. If she has it in abundance, then she gets a score of the weight times 2. For example, I gave Intelligence a weight of 1. A stupid woman gets a score of 0, and she&#8217;s disqualified no matter how she scores otherwise. A woman of average or slightly above average intelligence gets a score of 1, and a very intelligent woman gets a score of 2.</p>
<table border="1" width="420">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="width: 120px;"><strong>Characteristic</strong></td>
<td style="width: 75px;" align="center"><strong>Weight</strong></td>
<td style="width: 75px;" align="center"><strong>Woman1</strong></td>
<td style="width: 75px;" align="center"><strong>Woman2</strong></td>
<td style="width: 75px;" align="center"><strong>Woman3</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width: 115px;">Intelligence</td>
<td style="width: 55px;" align="center">1</td>
<td style="width: 101px;" align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#ff0000">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width: 115px;">Maternity</td>
<td style="width: 55px;" align="center">1</td>
<td style="width: 101px;" align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width: 115px;">Trait 3</td>
<td style="width: 55px;" align="center">2</td>
<td style="width: 101px;" align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width: 115px;">Trait 4</td>
<td style="width: 55px;" align="center">2</td>
<td style="width: 101px;" align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width: 115px;">Trait 5</td>
<td style="width: 55px;" align="center">3</td>
<td style="width: 101px;" align="center">6</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width: 115px;"><strong>Total</strong></td>
<td style="width: 55px;" align="center"><strong>18</strong></td>
<td style="width: 101px;" align="center"><strong>15</strong></td>
<td align="center"><strong>13</strong></td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#ff0000"><strong>16</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>These characteristics received the heaviest weights:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Recommendations</strong>. Weight=5. Recommendations from people I greatly respect.</li>
<li><strong>Respect</strong>. Weight=3. See above.</li>
<li><strong>Patriarchy</strong>. Weight=3. See above.</li>
<li><strong>Kindness</strong>. Weight=3. Obvious.</li>
<li><strong>Integrity</strong>. Weight=3. See above.</li>
<li><strong>Industry</strong>. Weight=3. Hard working and self-motivated.</li>
<li><strong>Health</strong>. Weight=3. Obvious.</li>
<li><strong>Figure</strong>. Weight=3. See above.</li>
<li><strong>Age</strong>. Weight=3. See above.</li>
</ul>
<p>A few other characteristics: Cheer, generosity, spirituality, torah, humor, fertility, family, domesticity (cooking, mending, etc.), financial acumen, etc.</p>
<p>I put 12 women on my chart. I was already very interested in 2 of them, mildly interested in 4. 2 others had expressed an interest in me, and I added 3 in whom I have no interest at all, just for balance. Based on the deal killing traits, I immediately eliminated 9 women. Out of a possible score of 136, the remaining 3 received scores of 93, 91, and 22. (The last received such a low score because too many cells are occupied by question marks.) That gives me a plan of action: Attract the attention of the 2 top scorers and collect more data on the 3rd place finisher.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure most women and some men would find this method too cold. I&#8217;m fine with that. If you don&#8217;t like it, don&#8217;t use it. I expect this might be more useful to analytically inclined men&#8211;computer geeks, engineers, etc. Many others might think I&#8217;m being too picky. I&#8217;m fine with that too. For the moment, I&#8217;m perfectly happy being single. I don&#8217;t have or want a girlfriend, and I haven&#8217;t asked anyone out since last August. At the moment, this is more of an intellectual exercise than anything else.</p>
<p>Correction: I had a date in December, but it didn&#8217;t turn out well. There&#8217;s a deal killer I didn&#8217;t mention: She forgets to tell you she&#8217;s married.</p>
<p>Update March 13, 2008: Here&#8217;s another deal killer: gross immodesty. I don&#8217;t mind a tomboy, and I don&#8217;t mind a twisted sense of humor. I <em>don&#8217;t</em> want to hear about her sexual exploits or how proud she is of her bodily functions. I don&#8217;t want anyone else to hear those things either. Modesty is all about knowing (and keeping!) the appropriate time and place for everything.</p>
<p>Update March 14, 2008: I used to think I was the only man to be so analytical about relationships until I came across this Kim du Toit article: <a href="http://www.theothersideofkim.com/index.php/tos/single/11474">Why Bother?</a></p>
<p>Update March 15, 2008: I need to add yet more fields:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Parental Recommendations</strong>. Weight=5. Recommendations from my parents.</li>
<li><strong>Infatuation</strong>. Weight=4. Feelings come and go&#8211;which is why this only counts for 8 out of a possible 154 points (so far)&#8211;but I&#8217;d still really like to feel something for someone I might marry. Call me a romantic.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.historycarper.com/wordpress/2008/the-woman-calculator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

