Posts Tagged ‘Torah’

Tazria 5768 – She Shall Be Unclean

Monday, March 31st, 2008

Leviticus 12:2

…she shall be unclean for seven days… This is the same as the monthly seven day period of uncleanness and corresponds to the seven days of the Creation Week. The potential for new life has gone out of her, and this is a period of rest and restoration before she will begin a new cycle of creation. In actuality, it is often much more than one week–sometimes several months–before a woman resumes her monthly cycles. In the case of childbirth, the normal seven days is extended to at least forty.

Remember that “unclean” does not mean “sinful.” The Hebrew word for unclean, tamay, does not necessarily mean dirty or defiled. It means blocked or walled off. Something which is unclean is off limits. Defilement might cause something to become tamay, but something tamay is not necessarily defiled.

Ki Tisa 5768 – The Price of Patriotism

Thursday, February 21st, 2008

Exodus 30:12
…every man a ransom for his soul…
Although the King James translators chose to put “children” here instead of “sons,” the remainder of the text is clear that males are intended. This tax was only levied against men who were able to fight. No women or children were included. The resulting count of half-shekels was no doubt used to assign the leaders of tens, hundreds, and so forth, as well as to estimate the nation’s fighting strength. Women and children were not counted, because they did not participate in combat except in the most extreme circumstances. The half-shekel was silver, representing the blood of the donator. It was a statement of patriotism, of willingness to defend Israel to the death if required.

Mishpatim 5768 – Undercover

Tuesday, January 29th, 2008

Exodus 22:18 – Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.

Samuel told Saul that “Rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft.” Other than the obvious rebellion of doing something forbidden, the connection used to escape me. How is rebellion like witchcraft?

The Hebrew word translated “witch” is kashaf. Maybe the past couple of weeks spent pondering biblical references to headcoverings has got me in a rut, but when I read Adam Clarke’s comments on this verse, something clicked.

It is very likely that the Hebrew…cashaph, and the Arabic cashafa, had originally the same meaning, to uncover, to remove a veil, to manifest, reveal, make bare or naked…The mecashshephah or witch, therefore, was probably a person who professed to reveal hidden mysteries, by commerce with God, or the invisible world.

If Clarke was correct, then the connection would seem to be in the uncovering of things that should remain hidden. Necromancy, fortune telling, and spiritism are all areas of knowledge that God said not to delve. There are times when a head should be covered or uncovered, and the same is true for other things. Like uncovering a head as if to disdain the authority it represents, witchcraft removes the cover of Torah, which God put in place to protect his people. It is a rejection of his providence and authority.

Vayeira 5768 – Divine Genocide

Tuesday, October 23rd, 2007

A chart inspired by the comments on my last post:

Ante-deluvian
Genesis 6
Sodom & Gomorrah
Genesis 18-19
Egypt
Exodus 1-4
Canaan
Joshua
Commonality
Primary Cause Violence Violence Oppression &
infanticide
Child sacrifice Violence
Possible Secondary Cause Sexual immorality Sexual immorality Idolatry & hard-heartedness Idolatry ?
Means of Destruction Flood Fire & brimstone Ten plagues War Miraculous
Means of Escape Ark Feet Blood & feet Red cord, feet, & deception Divine guidance
& human action

The primary cause in each case of divine genocide was unjust violence. There were definitely secondary issues, such as homosexuality, temple prostitution, hard heartedness, etc., but I don’t think those were named as causes.

The means of destruction was always at least partly divine. In the case of the Canaanites, God used the Israelites, but they were still assisted by direct divine intervention.

The means of escape were never solely divine. God always provided guidance and sometimes protection, but people were always partly responsible for their own safety. If Noah hadn’t built the ark, he would have died with the rest. If Lot hadn’t walked away from Sodom, if the Israelites hadn’t painted their lintels and crossed the Red Sea, if Rahab hadn’t hung the red cord, or the Jebusites deceived Joshua, they all would have died.

Remember one of the lessons of Lech Lecha: What happens to the fathers, happens also to the children.

(The destruction of the Canaanites doesn’t fit into this scheme as neatly as the other three do. For one thing, the Canaanites weren’t a single civilization, but multiple independent city-states with varying degrees of spiritual sickness. Some were allowed to leave if they were able, while some were to be completely wiped out, with no escape possible.)

Following Torah

Friday, August 10th, 2007

Over the past decade I have spent a lot of time discovering what it means to follow Torah. We all know that the essense of the Law is love: Love God with all your being, and love your neighbor as yourself. I have tried to learn how that applies to waking up in the morning, to eating lunch, to watching television, and to building relationships.

I can follow all the rules in the world and still not really live Torah. I know people who don’t give a rats ass about whether or not they should eat a seafood salad, but who follow Torah much more closely than I do. The couple who give all their time for the spiritual health of murderers and thieves, the man who volunteers day after day to serve hot meals at the Rescue Mission, the woman who spends her afternoons teaching art to neglected and hard-to-teach children, the child who saves his allowance all year to buy Christmas presents for everyone but himself.

For if anyone is a hearer of the Word and not a doer, he is like a man studying his natural face in a mirror. For he studied himself and went his way, and immediately he forgot what he was like. But whoever looks into the perfect Law of liberty and continues in it, he is not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work. This one shall be blessed in his doing. If anyone thinks to be religious among you, yet does not bridle his tongue, but deceives his own heart, this one’s religion is vain. Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, to visit orphans and widows in their afflictions, and to keep oneself unspotted from the world….If a brother or sister is naked and destitute of daily food, and if one of you says to them, Go in peace, be warmed and filled, but you do not give them those things which are needful to the body, what good is it?

-James, the Just

Mercy above Sacrifice

Tuesday, December 12th, 2006

Matthew 12:7
But if you had known what this is, “I desire mercy and not sacrifice,” you would not have condemned those who are not guilty.

Matthew 22:36-39
“Master, which is the great commandment in the Law?”
Jesus said to him, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like it, You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”

Yeshua plainly refuted the idea that there is no hierarchy or precedence within God’s law. There are greater commandments and lesser commandments. Some laws must be held higher than others in order to resolve apparent conflicts such as healing or feeding the poor on the Sabbath.

Most Christian theologians divide the law into two parts, moral and ceremonial, and they usually dismiss the ceremonial as irrelevant to life after the cross. I believe that division is incorrect and does a great deal of harm. It would be much better to divide the law the same way that Yeshua did: by beneficiary. All of God’s laws have a beneficiary, and usually more than one: either Self, Others, or God.

The Sabbath honors God and includes provisions for ensuring the rest of others, but obedience to it is primarily self-serving. There is nothing wrong with that. God gave us that law for our own benefit. For some, it is a vital opportunity to say no without causing hard feelings.

Other laws are aimed at the benefit of others and take precedence over the former. “If you buy a Hebrew servant, he shall serve six years. And in the seventh he shall go out free for nothing.” A slave owner is required to care for the physical and spiritual welfare of the slave. Like the Sabbath, the laws governing Hebrew slavery fits all three categories: It honors God by honoring his image and his chosen people. It benefits the slave owner by ensuring the good will of his slaves and the health of his community. However, the slave reaps the greatest benefit. His servitude was limited in duration, scope, and rigor. He is assured generous compensation for his service. In fact, if he sold himself into slavery, he will be paid at least twice: First when he sold himself, second during the course of his service, and third when he is released.

Laws that benefit God always benefit the law-keeper and those around him. “You shall have no other gods before me,” for example. Worshipping other gods is a waste of effort and might actually invite sickness and disaster, but primarily we worship only one God because that is what he wants.

We have to be very careful with this category. All of God’s laws were given for mankind’s benefit, and we shouldn’t say that one law or another primarily benefits God unless he has told us so as in, “For I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God…” Sacrifice is a good example. Blood sacrifices were never about satisfying God’s blood lust, for he has none. Like Yeshua’s sacrifice, the sacrifice of animals was to bring us closer to God. Hence, blood sacrifice is mostly for the benefit of the one bringing it.

If you encounter an apparent conflict in obeying God’s laws, he has already given us the standard which we are to follow. Choose the path which honors God first, then that which honors others, and finally that which honors ourselves.